Although advances in medical technology have vastly improved the way in which anesthesia is administered, patients can
still suffer harm as a result of anesthesia errors, whether from receiving too much or insufficient anesthesia, or the wrong type of anesthesia altogether.
Not exact matches
The report, requested by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), says it is possible to stem the
still - escalating prevalence of opioid use disorder and other opioid - related
harms without foreclosing access to opioids for patients
suffering from pain whose providers have prescribed these drugs responsibly.
Price made it clear that the alkaline diet idea had caused much
suffering: «It is my belief that much
harm has been done through the misconception that acidity and alkalinity were something apart from minerals and other elements... An illustration of this is the following case: A girl was brought for assistance and study who
still had her childhood face at sixteen years of age.
The Oscar - winning actress jumped full - force into the role of Sylvia, a beautiful but distant woman hiding from her past who, years later,
still suffers from an unknown trauma that leads her down a path of self - destructive behavior ranging from self -
harm to sexual addiction.
Since pushing for welfare reforms often involves working directly with food and clothing industry companies, this work can give the public the impression that these companies treat their animals well when this is not the case, especially when animal advocates are incentivized to make the reforms seem like drastic improvements when animals
still suffer substantially.213 Critics would also argue that, empirically, welfare reforms such as banning battery cages reduce only a very small portion of the
harm of animal agriculture — if any — so they are not the most cost - effective use of time.214, 215, 216
Since pushing for welfare reforms often involves working directly with food industry companies, this work can give the public the impression that these companies treat their animals well when this is not the case, especially when animal advocates are incentivized to make the reforms seem like drastic improvements when animals
still suffer substantially.192 Critics would also argue that, empirically, welfare reforms such as banning battery cages reduce only a very small portion of the
harm of animal agriculture, if any, so they are not the most cost - effective use of time.193, 194, 195
This language appears to require that a plaintiff who has
suffered, say, medium
harm, or even serious
harm that is not «sufficiently» serious,
still has their case dismissed.
Aside from whether the plaintiff can show grounds to believe that he / she / it has a good case and the defendant has no good defence, the court
still has to weigh the potential or actual
harm suffered by the plaintiff against the public interest in the expression.
Even if plaintiffs show they didn't consent to the use of their biometric information, they might
still have to show that they
suffered concrete
harm, based on a recent U.S. Supreme Court case.