Sentences with phrase «still vote shares»

And although they aren't actively run, index funds still vote shares.

Not exact matches

may still be permitted to vote your shares.

The shares remain credited to him because he still controls their voting rights and receives dividends.

However, the recipient will still receive dividends on, and may vote, the restricted Shares.

But it's still a step away from «one share, one vote».

I guess the lesson of Travis Kalanick's resignation as chief executive officer of Uber Technologies Inc. is that you can be the visionary founder of a massive company, stay private to avoid the pressures of the public market, keep control of a majority of the voting power of the shares, and still be forced out in a boardroom coup led by activist shareholders:

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you still may be able to vote your shares electronically by telephone or on the Internet.

Even if you own just 1 share of stock in General Electric (for example), you still own part of the company.Shareholders have voting rights and they profit when the company does well.

Still, even in Florida, Trump only garnered 19 percent of votes from those who chose their candidate based on «shared values.»

He won a somewhat larger share of the popular vote than had Buchanan, Huckabee, or Santorum — though he still finished a distant second for the nomination.

Alabama is still the nation's top team in the Week 7 BlogPoll, but two other SEC teams are slicing into the Crimson Tide's share of first - place votes after big Week 6 wins.

Labour registered a double - digit boost in their vote share but still couldn't do enough to come in first place.

Bushell's 1,216 votes (a 3.4 % share for that constituency), represented the English Democrats party's best showing for the election; though this was still a 5th place performance.

«If the numbers hold, 2010 will be highest percentage share of the gubernatorial vote ever for the still - young WFP.»

Details are still scarce, but the Democratic governor in the third and fourth legs of his State of the State tour said his latest effort to promote shared services and purchasing among local government entities would include a mandate that county executives develop a plan and then put it up for a popular vote.

Regionally, the party still fared best in the Dublin region at the local elections, where Labour candidates won 12.0 % of all the first preference votes, but the party vote share in Dublin fell dramatically from a 26.4 % level at the 2009 elections.

To be clear about my position on the vote: I am still looking for a more collaborative solution with fellow legislators to share the burden and protect the fiscal health of our communities to the greatest extent possible.»

The way this works is that about half of the member of parliaments are elected in a district using a first - past - the - post system but the overall share of seats allocated to each party still has to be roughly proportional to the share of the vote.

While the scheme would retain the first - past - the - post principle, and still calls for tactical voting, it would ensure a fairer distribution of seats in relation to parties» shares of the vote.

What's still to come (all timings are estimates) Friday 6 May First preference vote share information for elections to Northern Ireland Assembly London Mayoral result due to be announced Results of Police and Crime Commissioner elections in England and Salford mayoral contest are also expected on Friday Saturday 7 May 14:00 Results from five remaining councils in England 16:00 Result of Bristol Mayoral contest Result of elections to Northern Ireland Assembly expected Sunday 8 May 16:00 Result of elections to Bristol Council (final council in England to declare) Results of Police and Crime Commissioner elections in Wales

Labour, admittedly, was well up on its 1987 vote; but its share was still lower than it recorded in 12 consecutive elections between 1935 and 1979.

The more serious news for Labour is that the advantage may endure: for example, those who bought shares before 1987 were still slightly more likely than non - shareholders to vote Tory

Finally, despite a hung parliament being the most likely outcome and a fairer reflection of the fragmented distribution of votes, the two main parties are still on course to win 90 % of British seats from a combined share of just two - thirds of the vote.

In what promises to be a knife - edge election, the Tories could emerge well ahead of Labour in the national share of the vote, but still have insufficient MPs in the Commons to rule as a majority.

For me, the bigger story is how Labour could indeed end up third in the share of the popular vote but still emerge top in number of seats.

The two main parties are in the low 30s in the polls now in large part because of UKIP, but uniform change still seems to provide a reasonable guide as to how those overall vote shares translate into seats among key Con - Lab and Lab - Con marginals in England and Wales.

Still, David Cameron will need to get up towards 40 % of the vote, increasing his party's share in power as no post-war premier has done before him.

The change from the last poll is well within the margin of error and, if repeated at a general election, these shares of the vote would still give Labour an overall majority.

As the party who recently has benefited the most from FPTP (since 1979, Labour have on average won 12 per cent more seats than proportional vote share would have given them, versus an FPTP bonus of only 6 per cent for the Tories), surely Labour want to ensure they can still win power?

Still, Plaid will view themselves as one of the few winners in this election on a night where smaller parties saw their vote share squeezed across the UK.

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said the vote shares confirmed four party politics were at play in these elections, but it was still unclear if this would carry through to a general election.

I don't expect major changes in national vote share in 2020 necessarily but we could see UKIP still around 10 - 15 %, losing votes to the Tories in marginal seats but profiting from a post referendum backlash at the Tories expense in Essex, Kent and Lincolnshire etc and old labour areas like Sunderland, county Durham, Rotherham, Oldham etc which the Tories have abandoned.

«If Labour and the Conservatives had the same vote share [at the 2005 General Election] Labour would still have won 111 more seats.

That's not to say that young voters were not still important in explaining the election result — age was still an important divide on how people voted, young people did still heavily vote for Labour so it is still fair to say Labour managed to enthuse young people more, it's just that the level of turnout among under 25s does not appear to have risen; Labour just took a greater share of support among younger voters.

Nierenberg's agreement with ESIO provides that if ESIO buys back enough stock to push Nierenberg's holdings over 15 % of the outstanding shares, he will still be able to vote all of his stock as he wishes.

As you will remember NC had (and still has) a two class share structure; class A shares are publicly traded on the NYSE while class B shares are held by the controlling family and have 10x the voting rights of class A shares.

As for the A shares, some will argue their votes have no incremental value, since Page / Brin / Schmidt still have majority control via the super-voting power of their unlisted B shares — but if you think a dual - share structure's a bit evil, just a touch more evil might see significantly different values attached to each share class in some value - realisation event!

Brotalitometer: You can now compete to be the most manly or wantonly violent in custom levels.Level Sharing: Combined with Level Editor, you can now create, publish and upload your levels.Rate Levels: Tell Level Creators what you think of their genius and hard work, and have bros» vote on your levels as well, to bring the cream of the crop to the top.Mac build now available!ADDED!Sign posts (with words written on them) Can tag doodads in the Level EditorBrotality triggers, Entity triggers for when entities dieIMPROVED!The custom menu looks less like pandsThere will always be a bro that is spawned in the Level Editor (which is less confusing) Less z - fighting on trees and vehicles (though there is still more to do in this regard) FIXED!Stopped McBrover's satchel packs exploding arbitrarily on doorsBlocks don't float after being above cagesLevel Editor keeps better track of the level's filenameScout Mooks don't levitate while screamingSuicide Mooks are now less forgetfulSoftened the tanks» explosion of death (that had the effect of launching bros in the tanks» rockets)

The 31 % increase in Facebook shares will mean that the sale of up to 75 million shares can go ahead without any changes to the voting structure, while still raising the amount required.

He still owns roughly $ 70 billion worth of shares in the company, however, and his job is safe because he controls the majority of Facebook's shareholder vote.

Simon says 85 % of Taubman's shareholders voted to accept the deal, but the Taubman family and its allies still control enough voting shares to block the takeover.

While there were still the regular bikini - by - the - pool shots, many were sharing photographs of themselves after they voted.