Sentences with phrase «stock was worth less»

Today's trading was completely below the $ 1 - range and after losing value the entire day, the stock was worth less at the end of the day than at the start.

When the market drops and some of your stocks are worth less than you originally paid, you can sell them and buy a similar (but not identical) fund, and this loss can be used to offset capital gains on other holdings — or even reduce your regular income taxes.

Therefore, a put option is «in - the - money» when the underlying stock is worth less than the option's strike price.

Not exact matches

When it first hit the stock market in 2004, the search engine was worth less than toothpaste - maker Colgate - Palmolive, at about $ 27 billion at the close of trading that day.

Take the opportunity to sell stocks that are worth less than what you paid for them.

This includes $ 4 million in severance pay, the accelerated vesting of 5.1 million unvested stock units (worth about $ 15 million) plus options to buy more, as well as a cash payments of either $ 1 million or the cash bonus he would have been entitled to in 2015, whichever is less.

«If you anticipate the kind of huge appreciation in your personal wealth that could come from an IPO or a company sale, the best thing you can do is transfer stock to your heirs before the sale, because it will be worth much less then, and that minimizes the tax liability,» explains Allan Landau, a partner with Boston law firm Sherburne, Powers & Needham.

It can help you differentiate between a less - than - perfect stock that is selling at a high price because it is the latest fad among stock analysts, and a great company which may have fallen out of favor and is selling for a fraction of what it is truly worth.

Its wealth (sometimes referred to as «net worth») is the total stock of assets it has as a result of inheritance and saving, less any liabilities.

But as Alibaba's stock soared, Yahoo's dropped, an indication that the market seemed to concur with Jackson's analysis: Yahoo's core business was worth less than zero dollars.

Most fell 90 % or more from their highs, with many more going bankrupt, ultimately worth less than the paper their stock certificates were printed on.

Because stocks are generally more volatile than other types of assets, your investment in a stock could be worth less if and when you decide to sell it.

That's because there's a margin of safety, or a buffer, that's often built right in when you buy a dividend growth stock that's undervalued, as that favorable gap between price and value also means there's less of a possibility that the stock becomes worth less than you paid through some kind of negative event (corporate malfeasance, investor mistake, etc.).

We'll have more in stocks then we have today, but we'll be less exposed, as they'll represent a smaller portion of the growing net worth.

While declining credit metrics are worth keeping an eye on, Synchrony's stock has fallen so much that shares now trade for less than nine times forward earnings.

If you pay much less than a stock is worth, that «upside» works to simultaneously limit your «downside».

Following a market crash, your stock positions are likely worth much less than they were just days ago.

If a stock is selling for less than its intrinsic value, chances are this will ultimately be recognised and the market price will rise to a level more indicative of the company's worth.

Since stock of a company is just an ownership of earnings, investors are paying more money for stock that is worth less.

His only stock holdings were in MetLife and worth less than $ 15,000.

Because the endowment will come from stock holdings, it could ultimately be worth significantly more or less than the current $ 1.5 billion market value of the shares.

Before today, the stock was 11 percent below its book value of $ 18.92, implying investors view RIM as worth less than the net value of its cash, inventories, real estate and intellectual property.

If you put your $ 5,000 into a riskier asset class such as stocks (ie a stock mutual fund) then in 6 months your investment might be worth more than $ 5,000 or it could be worth less than $ 5,000 (possibly a lot less).

Value investing is a popular investment style used to get exposure to stocks that appear to be worth less currently than they are expected to be worth in the future.

One would want to pick out those high - quality dividend growth stocks that are priced less than they're actually worth for three massive reasons:

For better or worse, most of my net worth is equity in our house (lower return but less volatile than stocks — a bond substitute?).

My employer gives me 1000 options at $ 1, I never need to come up with the money, the shares are bought and sold in one set of transactions, and if the stock is worth $ 10, I see $ 9000 less tax withholding, hit the account.

The philosophy is based on identifying stocks that are currently trading for less than they should be worth and purchasing them in hopes the market will realize the company is undervalued and correct accordingly, giving you a return on your investment.

It's a stretch to call these companies small caps — all but the largest Venture - listed companies are micro caps (worth less than $ 300 million), and TSXV includes several penny stocks (those with share prices under $ 1).

In a high - dispersion environment, a manager's stock selection skill is worth more; if dispersion is low, his skill is less valuable.

If something unbeknownst occurs to reduce the value of the business, you could quickly be upside down on your investment (owning a stock that's worth less than you paid).

There is nothing precluding a high growth stock from trading materially less than a conservative estimate of its intrinsic worth, and thus becoming a value investment.

Or, if we're to invert the issue, are there any active long investors who are buying stocks they think are worth less than market price?

The investment return and principal value of stocks and mutual funds fluctuate with market conditions, and, when sold or redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost.

All of this also has a way of reducing one's risk, due to the margin of safety that's present when one pays much less than that which a stock is deemed to be worth.

Your stocks would be worth fewer dollars only because those dollars had become worth more, not because the stocks became less valuable relative to other stuff.

The cheap stocks may be really worth even less.

In other words, $ 10K invested that day would be worth less than $ 7,700 had it been invested in gold, and $ 18,000 in stock.

Instead, when stocks are going up, he happily pays more than their objective value; and, when they are going down, he is desperate to dump them for less than their true worth.

As described in my introduction to the concept of the MCTWI, in times of high valuation your stock market investments are actually worth less than their current price.

Every time you invest in the stock market, there is a risk that your investment may be worth less than you paid today.

Graham's philosophy of «value investing» — which teaches investors to buy stocks for less than the company's intrinsic worth is renown for shielding investors from substantial error — has made The Intelligent Investor a stock market bible ever since its original publication in 1949.

If you put your $ 5,000 into a riskier asset class, such as stocks (or a stock mutual fund), then in 6 months your investment might be worth more than $ 5,000 — or it might be worth less.

He then looked for stocks trading at less than two - thirds of the value this rigorous approach would indicate they were worth.

What's needed is, first, a definite rule for purchasing which indicates a priori that you're acquiring stocks for less than they're worth.

As described in my introduction to the concept of the MCTWI, in times of high valuation (like today) your stock market investments are actually worth less than their current price.

This is also why options experience time decay: the same option will be worth less tomorrow than today if the price of the stock doesn't move.

«What's needed is, first, a definite rule for purchasing which indicates a priori that you are acquiring stocks for less than they're worth.

When they ran out of favor, the stock went way down, he bought it all back for less than it was worth.

Obviously trading individual stocks is risky (see Enron) but as long as you're limiting it to less than 5 % of your net worth, your overall portfolio risk is minmal.