Sentences with phrase «stood by their beliefs»

While Yellen herself has indicated that the end of the rate - hiking cycle could be near, she and her fellow Federal Open Market Committee members have stood by the belief that inflation ultimately will gravitate toward their 2 percent target.

Anyway, I stand by my belief that if you are a happy person with a healthy dose of self - esteem, it's hard to tell others to f off once you have f you money.

So go ahead, stand by your beliefs.

I respect anyone who believes in something and stands by their beliefs, regardless of what it is.

Obviously it's his right to choose not to wrestle, and I respect him for standing by his beliefs, but those beliefs are a bit contradictory.

I still stand by my belief that there is no better taste in the world than good marzipan — The Lass in The Apron has made her own delicious Chocolate Covered Homemade Marzipan this week 4.

Nearly 40 years later — with his son, Joe Makowecki, at the helm as president and CEO — the Edmonton - based company stands by that belief.

Not all of Patterson's ideas were originally met with favor from Vince McMahon, but another critical aspect of the Patterson story is his willingness to stand by his beliefs.

That said I don't like that anybody does it, but I stand by my belief we do not going looking for it nearly as much as some others.

«I stand by my belief that she is unqualified to be the governor of New York, but sincerely apologize for the impression my comment clearly delivered.»

The mayor hinted at the federal and criminal probes buzzing around his and his allies fund - raising efforts and stood by his belief that the investigations are purely political in nature.

Police Commissioner James O'Neill on Friday stood by his belief that the NYPD «failed» when a sergeant fatally shot a 66 - year - old mentally ill woman who was swinging a bat.

And yes, I truly stand by the belief that every knowledge gained is an asset that nobody can take away from you.

We believe in building consumer confidence and will stand by this belief through providing this full SERVICE HISTORY report.

Alastair Lukies, Chief Executive of Monitise Group, said, «Monitise stands by its belief that the evolution of Mobile Money has the power to transform lives.»

However, I firmly stand by my belief that the statistics are ridiculous and I believe it is irresponsible to make the statements I referred to in my original post.

I never imagined the over-whelming feeling of gratitude — for those wise, dedicated and fearless individuals in our past that have helped to change life as we know it, raw courage — from those who looked opposition in the face and stood by their beliefs and values, as well as the pulsating energy that rose up through its walls of all those who believe that to make a change it takes but one individual to start a movement.

He stands by his beliefs despite them being false, illegal and or ludicrous.

We stand by our belief that everyone deserves an honest and compassionate attorney.

This is a huge increase and even if you still stand by your belief that Apple made a grievous error in dropping the headphone jack, Bluetooth headphone manufacturers are probably inclined to disagree.

Dr. Bowling stands by the belief of trying something new and have a willingness to learn.

One wonders if the more likely a mother is to stand by her beliefs and principles and not acquiesce under pressure from her ex and others in the court in order to protect her child, the more likely she is to be labeled within one of the more «severe» PAS categories.

Not exact matches

Now in every single Whole Foods, they have innovated the popcorn aisle, while standing by their core belief that a product should be good for you and for the world we live in.

When you learn to treat others equally regardless of belief or disbelief, you can pull Holier than Thou card, until then I stand by the fact that is hell exists, it is you who would be there for not following the Golden Rule!!

Why because that feel that they are right because they have their own beliefs that must be right but at the same token they belittle others because they stand by their own beliefs.

But I suppose that, to a religious person who's been indoctrinated to believe their ideology is the only true one and has been brainwashed into thinking that it's their obligation to «save» others by bringing them into their way of thinking, somebody standing up to that might seem like that person is pushing their beliefs on them, but they'd still be wrong.

Beliefs in gods is rampant because of indoctrination, fostered by those that stand to benefit from a flock of sheeple.

If you doubt the accuracy of the Bible, then how was a man named Job able to say with precision that «the earth hung upon nothing» (Job 26:7) some 3,600 years ago, since the most learned men even a thousand years later held to the belief that the earth was held up by elephants standing on the back of a giant turtle?

The logic of this belief is that all that is mentioned in the Qur» an is a matter of fact because it is supported by a standing miracle which will never cease, the Qur» an itself.

* How could you stand by your moral beliefs and still remain open to both Peter and his family in the process?

Yes, many aspects of Christendom are not so reasonable, and can be safely discarded, but the core beliefs of Christianity as founded by Jesus and centered upon Him can stand up to any and all challenges.

I find that Whitehead's exposition is question - begging and seriously misleading.4 The exposition is misleading insofar as it suggests that belief in either a specific or generic causal nexus is adequately justified by a subject's experience of CE alone and not ultimately by systematic considerations, particularly those related to prehension.5 If Whitehead's theory of perception was intended to stand alone without support from the rest of his system, as Ford suggests (EWM 181 - 182), then I claim that it is insufficiently justified insofar as a part of it, the theory of CE, is inadequately justified.

It is brave to stand up in front of hundreds of people, while being filmed by the BBC and live streamed around the world, and state your belief in the exclusivity of Christ - especially while serving as a democratically elected representative in Parliament.

In Roman society, an auctor was one who, by virtue of some combination of qualities, was thought to stand closer to the foundational beliefs and forms of life of the Roman people than others and was consequently assigned responsibility for protecting and augmenting those beliefs and ways of living.

If a religionist had to stand on their own with only their own mind to justify what they have been accepting as common belief they would be terrified if they thought all around them rejected what they thought was believed by all.

Does this mean that you're saying that a) religious people are nuts and atheists are getting on their level or b) that atheism is somehow a religion because they stand by their lack of a belief in a god?

Atheism stands by itself and is separate, it is not a system or doctrine of beliefs, it is a non-belief.

The claim of Christian belief is not first and foremost that it offers the only accurate system of thought, as against all other competitors; it is that, by standing in the place of Christ, it is possible to live in such intimacy with God that no fear or failure can ever break God's commitment to us, and to live in such a degree of mutual gift and understanding that no human conflict or division need bring us to uncontrollable violence and mutual damage.

I don't believe we should judge one another just because we have varying beliefs, but I will not stand by and be silent while certain organizations and religions use lies, fear and intimidation to pressure their converts to conform or get cast out and ostracized.

These suggest a vision which revealed Jesus in his heavenly glory at the right hand of the divine throne, not unlike that seen by the martyr Stephen when he looked up to heaven and «saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at God's right hand».47 So Goguel comments, «When we consider the part played by the faith in the resurrection in Paul's religious life and thought as a result of Christ's appearance to him, we see that most essential to his faith was not the feeling that Jesus had returned to the environment of his life on earth preceding his passion but a belief in his glorification, i.e. in his transition to life in heaven where death has no more dominion over him.»

I believe that a sober and instructed criticism of the Gospels justifies the belief that in their central and dominant tradition they represent the testimony of those who stood nearest to the facts, and whose life and outlook had been moulded by them.

It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main point, as I already explained is false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.

How refreshing that there are still real men out there who aren't afraid to state their beliefs and stand by them — even when it works against them.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Why is there no mention on the Belief Blog of Senatorial candidate Richard Mourdock who yesterday said that when a woman becomes pregnant during a rape «that's something God intended,» and today said he stands by those comments?

However, if one is delusional in the first place, it stands to reason that their religious beliefs may be skewed, misunderstood, and used by that person to try to justify their delusion.

But that faith makes him behave in ways that are popular for the most part: helping neighbors, contributing to his community, standing by his word, making sacrifices for his beliefs.

So Martin - Achard concludes: «the people of Yahweh found the concept of resurrection in Canaan; but for a long time this formed part of a realm over against which Yahweh stood in His sovereign will, so that, with regard to resurrection, the religion of the Canaanites played a negative part, by obliging the Israelites to make their stand against it; it had, nevertheless, a sort of indirect action, in making possible a sort of purification of this belief, which, in another age and within another context, received a new content.

If that's a «name calling rant» to you then I stand by original classifications, as you are only reinforcing my belief that they are accurate.

The Scottish FA stood by their man due to the sheer traction he had drawn to the national team, but he lasted just one more game before resigning in 1978, his once marauding self belief now shattered leaving a shell of a man.