Sentences with phrase «stop thinking science»

Not exact matches

If you're curious to learn more of Roberts's takeaways from his extreme experiment in disconnection, New York magazine's Science of Us column also has a fascinating follow - up interview with him in which he delves into the impact of his sabbatical on family life, how long it takes your brain to stop thinking in tweets, and other insights.

By trying to stop the religious right from slowing down science and critical thinking.

the natural cycle would be for man to grow up Stop Believing In Gods All Together.They said that it's stupid for any one to say theres no god They have no proof.Ok After Going Crazy i called them PHONY For never getting mad or angry OR CURSING.Then I Insulted Joseph Smith for being a HABITUAL LIAR.After Telling them That evolution is right.And Their Religion Is RIGHT NEXT TO SCIENTOLOGY In Made Up Horse Crap Then kicking them out.I Started To Think (NO Not about god He doesn't exist) But of science He said no one can proof there's no god.

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

Real Christians Hate Religion... Real Christians Hate Hypocrites... Real Christians should be more like Christ... How could you claim to be a Christian if you don't even know your Christ... The reason why doomed people would never understand Christ is because they never tried to search for the Truth... They only listen to such rubbish things rather than the Truth... Read and do more and Talk less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think about it... Stop the non-sense talk about God and Science and find it out for yourself...

Science calls on you to be as skeptical as you possibly can and never stop inquiring, even if you think you have the answer.

People are still so up - in - arms over the religion tossing that stank up this last election, that they are wanting creationist to just stop talking... but at the same time, I don't think anyone REALLY thinks science knows the EXACT age of the Universe or the planet.

Belief is central to science as well as religion — but we rarely stop to think how bizarre it is.

It's clear that Keyworth hasn't stopped thinking about the big science policy issues of the day.

Hayat Sindi, founder of the i2 Institute for Imagination and Ingenuity in Saudi Arabia, said she thinks many students in the Middle East, particularly women, stop taking science courses at the introductory level because science and science education are not adequately attuned to social needs.

When you start to examine the numbers closely it makes you stop and think... In the US women hold less than 25 % of STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) related jobs.

Think of «Groundhog Day» morphing from comedy to Science - Fiction and you'll get an idea of the amazing stuff waiting for you in «Edge Of Tomorrow», an incredibly entertaining summer movie from director Doug Liman that is potent enough to make us stop ID» ing him as «that guy from The Bourne Identity».

Teaching Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Self - Management Skills to All Students: The Cognitive - Behavioral Science Underlying the Success of The Stop & Think Social Skills Program

In this webinar, we highlight: (a) a science - to - practice model complemented by the Stop & Think Social Skills Program; (b) ways to evaluate SEL program outcomes using a user friendly data management platform; and (c) how to implement a flexible, practical SEL program from start to finish.

Even after he was ousted as the premier naturalist of his age and the most celebrated man of science in America - even as he suffered, at age sixty - two, a cerebral hemorrhage that first paralyzed him, then required him to take to his bed for most of a year, forbidden by his doctors to smoke his beloved cigars or even to think, either of which they predicted might kill him - Harvard professor Louis Agassiz never stopped spinning grand plans or forging ahead with them.

I think we need science to help quite a lot with some of the planning, but sooner or later engineers have to decide when to stop quibbling.

People really do need to stop thinking of «climate science», as science.

But much as I'm tempted, I'm going to stop short of an essay on the general corruption of science and its causes, aside from affirming your implicit assertion that some part of this comes from allowing religious thinking to interfere with rational and objective thought and the objective and unbiased appraisal of evidence.

Hobby sites like «WattsUpWithThat» are a start to effective opposition, but to be honest it really is time that the fossil fuel industry who so many believers think are funding the sceptics, got off their backsides, put their hands in their pockets and did the decent thing to fund the professional science «opposition» which is needed to force the climategate forecasters to stop feeding this monster with their PR and start to try to justify the existence of their monster based on real science in the face of real decently financed opposition and not part - time unpaid people like us here.

While I'm hesitant to guess what parallels climate activists are demanding (I agree with the opinion above that they haven't thought it through), it's my guess that, after many years of very expensive discovery and testimony, if they could prove a conspiracy to «deny» whatever «science» the activists think is being denied, they would be required to stop.

Yes science pointing to saturation of natural sinks is contradictory, this is developing science, facts are that by Knorrs own paper (that you guys pointed to) it is imperative that we stop CO2 from going into the atmosphere as, once we do reduce it natural proceeses will be slower to get it down than thought.

Perhaps we should stop thinking of it as a natural science but, at best, a social science.

Science can not stop while ethics catches up — and nobody should expect scientists to do all the thinking for the country.

I think they'll tell you the most important thing to them is to stop the scientists from being considered credible to prevent policy being based on the science.

When the point used against your opinion is that there is a consensus in science, do not stop thinking and blindly accept the consensus.