Furthermore, the December coal ash spill in Tennessee makes it clear that there is no adequate means of safely
storing coal combustion waste.
Not exact matches
Until advanced
coal -
combustion technologies become widely available that allow CO2 to be captured and
stored safely underground, the shift to
coal is bad news for climate change because
coal plants usually emit about twice the CO2 per kilowatt - hour of electricity that gas plants do.
The billions of tons of
coal combustion waste produced by power plants needs to be
stored somewhere, often in waste sites that are inadequately engineered to avoid dangerous spills or leaching of hazardous chemicals into groundwater supplies.
But there's a new
coal - based power generation technology, Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle, or IGCC, which allows CCS systems in new plants to more efficiently capture and
store CO2 because the CO2 can be removed before
combustion.
Given that the models assume that future
coal combustion will be significantly curtailed, the alternative cement solution relies on
storing fly ash for reuse, diverting it from other uses, and mining fly ash that was previously deposited in landfill.
Zero - emission technology most typically involved the vision of
coal gasification, in which pollutants would be separated out of the emissions stream prior to
combustion, together with carbon capture and sequestration, in which carbon dioxide would be liquified and
stored permanently underground.
Big
Coal says that capturing and storing CO2 from these new coal plants is a slam - dunk technology — but one that's not quite ready for prime time yet (capturing CO2 from existing combustion coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 perce
Coal says that capturing and
storing CO2 from these new
coal plants is a slam - dunk technology — but one that's not quite ready for prime time yet (capturing CO2 from existing combustion coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 perce
coal plants is a slam - dunk technology — but one that's not quite ready for prime time yet (capturing CO2 from existing
combustion coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 perce
coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 percent).