Sentences with phrase «story agreed on this point»

All the climate scientists I spoke to for this story agreed on this point.

Not exact matches

Chris — I can totally relate to your story and I agree with you on many points.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

And yes, you're talking about a single event that happened thousands of years ago on a single day And I meant the later, when I ask question, they are generally honest questions, but back to the point, you agreed with me on every, because you assumed that at least part of the story was true, but who is the everyone you were referring to?

-- «And I meant the later, when I ask question, they are generally honest questions, but back to the point, you agreed with me on every, because you assumed that at least part of the story was true...»

Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?

Point of story, i know kids SHOULD taste and eat all sorts of things, that kids should eat what's on the table and not have a short order cook, and i agree totally that they CAN eat the type of lunch pictured above, but one thing DOES bother me: Kids NEED fuel for their day, and i don't think giving them something completely new and fancy as a lunch is a great idea as the lunch will most likely end up still in the lunch box at the end of the day and you will have a famished child waiting for dinner.

There's more to the story... the point the author goes for is mostly abut how husbands and wives should learn to cooperate on the shared tasks of household economic management, so that both are on the same page, and they can be agreed on goals and methods.

I agree with Mr. Murphy that the evidence in the Stanley case was sufficiently problematic that an acquittal was a realistic possibility: a distinctly unsatisfactory RCMP investigation and key Crown witnesses whose stories changed significantly would suffice even if Mr. Stanley's own explanation seemed far - fetched and was disbelieved, After all, not believing a witness on a point is no evidence at all of the converse of what the witness has stated.

After agreeing on the points, I asked each of them to share two stories each.

Mr. Corcodilos and I agree on one point: «Unless you work with a rare resume writer who interviews you in depth, this «story development» won't happen.

Alan: Athough you and I have disagreed on many points in the past, I must say that recently I have agreed with your position on this matter as well as with your position on the recent «deposit» related story as previously presented on this site.