Not exact matches
I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because
lack of tactics,
strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal
games.We have got short mind players who play two good
games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.
It has never been said but historically Wenger plays 2nd team players that are thinking of leaving due to
lack of
games as a
strategy to get them to sign.
Well im not in a wonderland he has his failings as we all do and great teams find a way to win good teams sit where we are 6 -5-4 but thats besides the point and it would be nice if your aunty had bolocks cause then we d be second but ive watched the
games were an offensive team most the time although were terrible in the pissing rain but for the most part the
game plans have worked weve created chances quality scoring chances one after the other problem is for me the finishing unless we sit back with 9 man behind the ball or ten when you push forward you will give up a goal if you lousy forwards fail to finish the set ups have been there this year but our strikers have failed to kill the
games if we create quality chances and grab leads in the first 60 minutes like we have for the most part and in those
games those
games should of been killed even if we give a goal or two alongside the
strategy but we failed to hit multiple should be goals we tried laca we'll see abou auba although hes a bit lazy so far but we'll see but we've
lacked that quality in front goal a player the chances have been there im looking at the failure of the strikers and maybe that is his fault but monreal has scored as many goals recently as our strikers and thats sad our defenders or a midfielder will score and our stikers cant tally one in th first 60 mins of a
game alongside them then were tired for last 40 give them hope there still only down one and we rue our missed chances while they push thats where iv been frustrated with this season not the tactics but the finishing
His Bears
lack discipline and his in -
game strategies leave a lot to be desired.
The
game has all the components of a good leisure side - scrolling semi-
strategy, with upgradable units, shops, money, grenade throwing and so on but it
lacks depth: there is no story really, there is no premise, tutorials are silly as the whole writing overall, enemies are not explained (nor their skills), and
strategy pretty much boils down to clicking on whatever units cools down first (to produce that unit and storm the enemy's portal).
Pared down
strategy elements, scanty arsenal of weapons,
lack of single - player missions and decent tutorials — yep, it's all there, but, in contrast to shooters that come off big assembly lines, the developers put love and effort into making of this
game.
It's incredibly accessible and
lacks the sometimes overbearing menus and micromanagement that can make
strategy games dizzying and intimidating, making it a nice point of entry for those looking for a casual experience within the genre.
Sid Meier's Starships is a pretty good challenging
strategy game, with tactical depth, but suffers from a
lack of artistic ambition and a flat atmosphere that leaves one indifferent.
Natural Doctrine's intense level of difficulty is mostly attributed to its producer, Kensuke Tanaka, who reportedly believes that the current state of
strategy RPGs is
lacking in both quality and challenge, which is why he set out to make one of the deepest
strategy games out there.
Will Metal Gear Survive end up being an entertaining survival -
strategy game despite
lacking the personality of past Metal Gear
games?
Unfortunately the
lack of multiplayer does shorten the life span quite a bit though... The Verdict: 7 An overall solid
game that borrows from many of the turn based
strategy classics that's ultimately let down by the
lack of multiplayer.
Will Metal Gear Survive end up being an entertaining survival -
strategy game despite
lacking the personality of past Metal Gear
games?
Unless you consider the mob - style frenzy of FATE's, the
game lacked the group
strategy and teamwork that I was missing.
Now that I know the concept, I'm pretty disappointed at the
lack of
strategy or depth to the
game.
Most systems that would otherwise qualify as single player
strategy games sadly
lack a clear enforceable goal — Rogue - likes or so - called «puzzle
games» like Tetris come to mind.
Its
lack of custom
games against AI, dreadfully repetitive and overextended campaign, and hard to access content brings down what is otherwise a fun
strategy game.
It's a good
game to kill time with, especially if you enjoy
strategy games and don't mind the
lack of sound or great eye candy visuals.
While the
game is a nice starter for turn - based
strategy newcomers, genre veterans will likely find it
lacking in challenge.
The
game does
lack that high - level tuning most
strategy games have.
Warhammer 40,000: Squad Command is an enjoyable slice of handheld
strategy, that does few things wrong, though many PC
gamers will find that it
lacks depth compared to the
strategy games they play on their mighty rig, but do be reasonable, this is a portable
game and a well crafted one at that.
Due to the
lack of moves, there isn't really any
strategy, and the
game never changes.
One thing I see
lacking in this «longest monopoly
game» is discussion of the most well proven, well practiced human
strategy in dealing with adverse environments: adaptation and mitigation on a case - by - case basis.
It is never too late to get in on this
game, as few companies are fully investing (or doing so slowly) in these networks due to longstanding
strategy and a
lack of social tools to assist in content creation.
ASUS Cerberus gaming headset performs well in shooter and
strategy game like DOTA2 but
lacks clarity when listening to certain music genres.
And the
game does not favor those who
lack attention to detail in their resume writing
strategy.