One particularly interesting aspect of the decision is that, when the law first came out, my understanding is that lawyers for accused spent time arguing that this was
a strict liability offense, so as to extend the defense of due diligence to their clients.
For example, speeding is a summary and
strict liability offense: you're guilty if you're over the speed limit.
Speeding, being
a strict liability offense, does not have any legal defenses.
Not exact matches
To challenge speeding tickets, specifically, drivers must prove there was a lack of evidence for the violation, as some states, such as Alaska, consider speeding a «
strict liability»
offense.