Sentences with phrase «striker upfront»

Name a team that has won with a mean defence but did not have a star striker upfront to convert that defence into goals?

The attacking midfielders can also drop back for us to defend with nine players whilst also having two strikers upfront so when a clearance is made they can chase the defenders down.

Harry Kane to play as lone striker upfront with Erikson, Lamela and Ki playing in attacking roles.

Not going to win the league or CL with no WC striker upfront coupled with Wenger's team selection, tactics and coaching.

I know there's no wingers in this team but I believe theo can do well with a partner through the middle, Ox's future is at CM / CAM so he can still be an influence off the bench in this system, Podolski is a CF so he would flourish playing off a partner like Giroud or Sanchez as St, Ozil also playing as CAM which we all want, he's got guys behind him who'll make runs into the box and also pacey strikers upfront to pick a perfect pass which he does best

We defend his lack of big game performance and say thet Ozil needs a workd class striker upfront to give his best.

I don't have a problem with having Giroud or any of our young strikers upfront, if both wings are covered by top class wing players who can score 15 + goals each.

We can have two superb strikers upfront.

Selects Sanchez as lone striker upfront even when he knows Sanchez can not operate alone.

Okay, let's applaud Wenger for putting a rubbish striker upfront, a central mid on the wing, starting a RB for the first time after months out when he clearly isn't match fit, and dropping one of best keepers in the league this season.

I understand your frustration, but believe me with spacey striker upfront, Cazrorla can play really good even as LW.

Sane, Silva, David Silva, Fernandinho, De Bruyne and Sterling will probably start in the midfield while Jesus will be there as the lone striker upfront for Manchester City.

Ludogorets are heavy under dogs going into the game but in Jonathan Cafu they have a quality striker upfront who can cause problems for Arsenal defense.

Now with Giroud out for 3 months Wenger wont be able to play the lone striker upfront as we don't have a player of that quality, so what happens now,

i didn't mention numbers, i said WC, i was very careful to do this.im afraid your agruement is just stupid, and i notice you didn't give any examples of top teams who don't have a wc striker upfront

Atletico Madrid and Leicester City use a pacey striker upfront and a hardworking attacking midfielder behind him to disrupt their opponent's defense:

Perez needs to pair up with another striker upfront, that is why I wanted to see Giroud play with him yesterday.

This season, Arsenal has been playing with a lone striker upfront, who is usually supported by a pair of wingers, who either assists the striker to score or contribute with goals themselves.

Play a Diamond midfield and 2 strikers upfront.

I get a feeling Wenger won't be buying any forwards because we play with 1 striker upfront, and with Theo, Alexis, & Welbeck considered to be forwards, I'm not sure he'll be hunting for another forward.

We have been playing one striker upfront and restricting the midfield to very definite and predictable roles.

With Giroud still our go to striker upfront, Arsenal will continue to stall its climb back to greatness.

Dortmund do nt have any injury worries and Tuchel is likely to go with Kagawa, Gundogan and Reus in attacking roles while Aubameyang to play lone striker upfront.

For a lone striker upfront, that is a great stat, and something that Chelsea have benefitted from.

Mario Balotelli and Rickie Lambert remain on the bench as Sturridge starts as lone striker upfront.