This week the United States Supreme Court accepted for consideration the case of Foster v. Humphrey, regarding Georgia prosecutors» use of peremptory challenges to
strike every black juror in the jury pool in the defendant's case.
The standard we adopt under the Federal Constitution is designed to ensure that a State does not use peremptory challenges to
strike any black juror because of his race.
Not exact matches
The law states that once the defense has made an initial showing that
jurors are being
struck just because they are
black and may sympathize with a
black defendant, the prosecution must show that there were other legitimate reasons.
Many criminal defense lawyers, she says, «maintain that the prosecution practice of using peremptory
strikes to remove
black jurors remains widespread.»
[p97] For example, a «pattern» of
strikes against
black jurors included in the particular venire might give rise to an inference of discrimination.
The Court now rules that such use of peremptory challenges in a given case may, but does not necessarily, raise an inference, which the prosecutor carries the burden of refuting, [p101] that his
strikes were based on the belief that no
black citizen could be a satisfactory
juror or fairly try a
black defendant.