In a companion report, the Senate Republican Policy Committee estimates the job losses and «energy tax» burden (compliance cost + GDP reduction) each State will incur if EPA picks the most
stringent ozone standard it is considering.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately, EPA then issued new, more
stringent 2015
ozone standards before fully implementing the 2008
standards.
We've expressed puzzlement that the agency wants to impose more
stringent standards when the existing ones are working — lowering
ozone levels 18 percent between 2000 and 2013 according to EPA's own data.
After the Bush EPA finalized the 2008
ozone standard, environmental pressure groups complained it wasn't
stringent enough.
In 2013, the Government of Canada established more
stringent and comprehensive outdoor air quality
standards for fine particulate matter (a component of which is black carbon) and ground - level
ozone.
The group's modeling also indicates that the entire nation would be able to attain the more
stringent Obama administration
ozone standard, if it were not for international emissions, especially from Canada and Mexico, and for exceptional events like wildfires that add smog - forming chemicals to the air.