Sentences with phrase «stringent than state law»

Additionally in New York, a bill passed allowing municipalities to regulate pet dealers as long as those regulations are not less stringent than state law.

Not exact matches

It's more stringent than anti-spam legislation in the U.S., but not all that different from laws in EU member states like Ireland and Germany.

2) Whole industries have moved to places where wages are lower and labor laws and environmental standards less stringent than they are in the United States.

Blake assures WKS stays in compliance with all labor and employment laws — especially important for a company based in California, which has complex state and local employment regulations which are often more stringent than the federal rules.

Unlike his predecessor Mayor Michael Bloomberg, de Blasio has communicated his support to repeal the Urstadt Law, which, passed in 1971, took away New York City's power to issue local rent laws that are more stringent than those in any other state.

REBNY has traditionally focused its lobbying efforts — and dollars — on candidates for state office rather than in New York City, for two main reasons, Lerner said: First, the city's relatively stringent campaign finance laws have historically made it harder for special interest groups to gain as much influence here; and second, although many key issues — such as 421a tax abatements — affect only New York City, they are decided at the state level.

Collins's proposed law — the Second Amendment Guarantee Act, or SAGA — would overturn current state and local gun laws that are more stringent than federal regulations, while blocking states and localities from enacting any such laws in the future.

However, legal experts point to an earlier appellate court decision in 2003 on the Suffolk Ethics Commission that found a county can impose more stringent ethics regulations than those required by state law.

«We don't think the county law can create more stringent laws than state laws.

The situation for dogs in Texas remains desperate due to the work left to rebuild Houston after the storm, coupled with spay and neuter laws that are less stringent than in states like California, according to the Woodward Center

Under section 1178 (a)(2)(B) of the Act and section 264 (c)(2) of HIPAA, provisions of state privacy laws that are contrary to and more stringent than the corresponding federal standard, requirement, or implementation specification are not preempted.

Response: The concern underlying this comment is that ERISA plans, which are not now subject to certain state laws because of the «field» preemption provision of ERISA but which are subject to the rules below, will become subject to state privacy laws that are «more stringent» than the federal requirements, due to the operation of section 1178 (a)(2)(B), together with section 264 (c)(2).

We recognize that covered entities will need to learn the laws of their states in order to comply with such laws that are not contrary to the rule, or that are contrary to and more stringent than the rule.

(b) The provision of State law relates to the privacy of health information and is more stringent than a standard, requirement, or implementation specification adopted under subpart E of part 164 of this subchapter.

Thus, any element of a health care transaction that would implicate more than one state's law would automatically preclude the Secretary's evaluation as to whether the laws were more or less stringent than the federal requirement.

As explained in this section, the regulation would only preempt state laws where there is a direct conflict between state laws and the regulation, and where the regulation provides more stringent privacy protection than state law.

There are three exceptions to this general rule of preemption: State laws that the Secretary determines are necessary for certain purposes set forth in the statute; state laws that the Secretary determines address controlled substances; and state laws relating to the privacy of Start Printed Page 82471individually identifiable health information that are contrary to and more stringent than the federal requiremState laws that the Secretary determines are necessary for certain purposes set forth in the statute; state laws that the Secretary determines address controlled substances; and state laws relating to the privacy of Start Printed Page 82471individually identifiable health information that are contrary to and more stringent than the federal requiremstate laws that the Secretary determines address controlled substances; and state laws relating to the privacy of Start Printed Page 82471individually identifiable health information that are contrary to and more stringent than the federal requiremstate laws relating to the privacy of Start Printed Page 82471individually identifiable health information that are contrary to and more stringent than the federal requirements.

Section 264 also contains a preemption provision that provides that contrary provisions of state laws that are more stringent than the federal standards, requirements, or implementation specifications will not be preempted.

Even with respect to state laws relating to the privacy of medical information, the statute shields such state laws from preemption by the federal standards only if they are «more» stringent than the related federal standard or implementation specification.

The Department's statutory authority under HIPAA which allows the privacy regulation to preempt any state law if such law is contrary to and not more stringent than privacy protection pursuant to this regulation.

Furthermore, state laws that are more stringent than the rule, that is, state laws that provide a patient with greater access to protected health information, remain in effect.

Below is an outline of some highlights from federal lead - based paint regulations, but remember that some states and municipalities also have laws regulating lead - based paint disclosure, which may be more stringent than federal law.