Study: Ammonium as ice core proxy shows
strong Medieval Warm Period in the tropics.
Not exact matches
If, for example, scientists had somehow underestimated the climate change between
Medieval times and the Little Ice Age, or other natural climate changes, without corresponding errors in the estimated size of the causes of the changes, that would suggest
stronger amplifying feedbacks and larger future
warming from rising greenhouse gases than originally estimated.
But be sure that as an Arctic citizen, I am aware of no oral history about similar
warm weather times as found now a days, given
strong Homerian like oral history of the North, I am truly not impressed so far by this
medieval European tale.
Notice how the
strong «
Medieval Warm Period» around 1000 A.D. in the Esper et al. version contradicts the «
Medieval Cold Period» of the Briffa et al., version.
«It is generally accepted that the climate
warms during periods of
strong solar activity (e.g., the
Medieval Warm Period) and cools during periods of low solar activity (e.g., the Little Ice Age).»
These provide
strong contextual confirmation supporting CET on the
Medieval Warming period, Little Ice Age etc..
This data seems to suggest modern
warming stronger than that seen in the
medieval periods displayed (see figure 2): «Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate»
The film used research by McIntyre and McKitrick to support the argument for a
strong «
medieval warm period,» despite the fact that M&M's critique focused on the 15th century, a time period generally considered part of the Little Ice Age.