Sentences with phrase «strong argument in court»

It seems to me that he realized that he may not have a strong argument in court when he saw my radar.

Not exact matches

In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact».

[The] three departments of the government... being in certain respects checks upon each other, and our being judges of a court in the last resort, are considerations which afford strong arguments against the propriety of our extra-judicially deciding the questions alluded to.

I hope reason 4 of my argument for skirt outfits is proving strong in the court of fashion.

Strong chapters on school desegregation, bilingual education, education for the disabled, and school finance all support Davies's argument that «in the 1970s, reform often emanated from... within the federal bureaucracy, from the lower federal courts, and through the energetic efforts of congressional staffers, lobbyists, and public interest law firms.»

If you want to understand why a strong federal role is needed in advancing systemic reform of American public education — and why arguments for a so - called «energized retrenchment» or backsliding in that role from some conservative reformers like Andy Smarick of Bellwether Education are unconvincing — consider what happened in 1946 after the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Morgan v. Virginia.

Yet in November 2009, the Supreme Court ruled in a shock judgment, that followed strong arguments from the banks expensive barristers, that due to a narrow technical decision bank charges didn't NEED to be fair — well at least on the main piece of law that was tried.

«We know that we have the stronger legal arguments in this case and that California courts have interpreted state law correctly, including within the parameters of takings analysis,» says Angela Howe, Legal Director for the Surfrider Foundation.

Such arguments did not constitute the strong and compelling grounds required to stay proceedings before the High Court under an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of foreign insolvency proceedings.

His impressive tally of arguments before the Supreme Court is supported by a strong presence in wider appellate courts, with experience in cases concerning affirmative action policies, environmental disputes and wider constitutional and regulatory challenges.

We build the strongest possible case in support of your claim and present a persuasive argument in court to show that your claim should be covered without condition.

Bayer's strongest argument in the Supreme Court's eyes was the policy argument that if federal courts do not enforce their judgments denying certification, serial relitigation of class certification will result, and defendants will be forced to settle class actions.

Berman writes that if Rita prevails at the Supreme Court, Libby's lawyers will have even stronger grounds for appeal — which in turn will strengthen the argument for allowing Libby to remain free while his appeal is pending.

Even though Alphamix concerned a domestic arbitral award, the attitude of the Judge in scrutinizing the arguments against the enforcement of an award when a litigant has gone through all the proper court procedures, even public interest ones, is most welcome and sends a strong signal to public bodies which choose to have their commercial disputes resolved by way of arbitration, that they should take arbitration proceedings and arbitral awards made against them seriously.

In general, «the proper balancing of these interests against the reviewing courts» interests in hearing the strongest possible arguments in favour of each side of a dispute is struck when tribunals do retain the ability to offer interpretations of their reasons or conclusions and to make arguments implicit within their original reasons» (at para. 69In general, «the proper balancing of these interests against the reviewing courts» interests in hearing the strongest possible arguments in favour of each side of a dispute is struck when tribunals do retain the ability to offer interpretations of their reasons or conclusions and to make arguments implicit within their original reasons» (at para. 69in hearing the strongest possible arguments in favour of each side of a dispute is struck when tribunals do retain the ability to offer interpretations of their reasons or conclusions and to make arguments implicit within their original reasons» (at para. 69in favour of each side of a dispute is struck when tribunals do retain the ability to offer interpretations of their reasons or conclusions and to make arguments implicit within their original reasons» (at para. 69).

On the one hand, a permissive stance toward new arguments by tribunals on appeal serves the interests of justice insofar as it ensures that a reviewing court is presented with the strongest arguments in favour of both sides... This remains true even if those arguments were not included in the tribunal's original reasons.

The courts also appear to be less inclined to accept arguments about fair hearing or that justice can not be done in the alternative jurisdiction in the absence of the strongest possible evidence to the contrary (Ferrexpo AG v Gilson Investments Ltd & Ors [2012] EWHC 721 (Comm), [2012] 1 Lloyd's Rep 588).