Federal and state decision makers can enact
strong fuels policies — such as low carbon or clean fuel standards — that encourage cleaner electricity and better biofuels.
Not exact matches
The poll also found
strong support for other
policies that would help accelerate Canada's transition to clean energy, including federal support to help provinces use more renewable electricity, switching buildings and vehicles to clean power, and measures to cut the carbon emissions from gasoline and diesel
fuel.
With a rich career demonstrating a
strong advocacy for agriculture, North Carolina native Starling finds himself in the middle of critical decisions over global trade, renewable
fuels, and future farm
policy.
Beth Newcomer The Legislative Analyst for NYC Council Member Helen Rosenthal (District 6, Upper West Side) encouraged attendees to reach out to their local Council Members and urge them to support the following legislative initiatives: • Possible legislation regarding divestment of the city's pension funds from fossil
fuel companies • A bill to require the city to do a carbon footprint analysis of all the products the city procures, and to use that analysis to inform a
policy of low - carbon operations • A number of bills to reduce the carbon emissions of city - owned vehicles and improve the sustainability of city buildings • A bill to enhance the city's already -
strong idling laws so as to make them easier to enforce Find your Council Member here.
Next come Priti Patel with her forceful euroscepticism, Rory Stewart with his compelling back - story and foreign
policy knowledge, and then Robert Halfon, with his
strong campaigning on issues ranging from Libya to
fuel prices.
«I applied for the fellowship, because my research both in climate change and bio
fuel has always been extremely applied, and I didn't have a
strong background in
policy.
The effort has turned federal education
policy into an incoherent mess,
fueling opposition to a
strong federal role in supporting reform.
A new National Research Council report finds that by the year 2050, the U.S. may be able to reduce petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent for light - duty vehicles — cars and small trucks — via a combination of more efficient vehicles; the use of alternative
fuels like biofuels, electricity, and hydrogen; and
strong government
policies to overcome high costs and influence consumer choices.
Over all, Obama's choices reflect his longstanding pattern of charting a pragmatic path reflecting the need for
strong regulation, including of greenhouse gases (embodied in McCarthy), and the simultaneous need to advance responsible use of cleaner fossil
fuels while also using
policies and investments to advance non-polluting energy technologies for the long haul.
Continued
strong demand for all fossil
fuels seems a certainty at this time, even taking into account
stronger policies to mitigate global warming risks, though sustained high prices may slow growth slightly.
You can point the finger at all sorts of participants in this battle, but I believe (and we have been examining and discussing at length on this site for more than 8 years now) the principal drivers of the polarization are coming more from: (1) the corporate energy interests who are protecting their profits against regulation and other
policies that would move the system away from fossil
fuels, and using their clout in the political process to tie things up; (2) right - wing anti-government and anti-regulatory ideologues whose political views appear threatened by scientific conclusions that point toward a need for
stronger policy action; (3) people whose religious or cultural identities appear threatened by modern science; and so forth.
This decline is driven by a mix of economic growth; urbanisation, more availability of LPG, natural gas and electricity; and
stronger policy efforts to promote modern
fuels and improved cookstoves, motivated by the goals of reducing household air pollution and environmental degradation.
While the majority of Americans want
stronger U.S. action on climate change,
policies at the state and federal level continue to underwrite the ongoing exploration and production of fossil
fuels.
However, 1.9 W m − 2 scenarios could not be achieved in several models under SSPs with
strong inequalities, high baseline fossil -
fuel use, or scattered short - term climate
policy.
We're working for
stronger regulation of both greenhouse pollution from automobiles through the Clean Air Act and higher
fuel economy standards pursuant to the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act, two partially overlapping and complimentary statutory schemes.
A
policy mix comprising cash transfers,
stronger social insurance and limits on the use of fossil
fuels would lead to faster economic growth,
stronger employment creation and a fairer income distribution, as well as lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Recently growth in solar power installations has been particularly
strong in the mid-west and south of the country — in pro-Trump states that have traditionally turned their backs on renewable energy and supported the president's fossil
fuel policies.
Simply improving messaging in accordance with recommendations of psychologists or following the recommendations of economists to create economic incentives to engage in less GHG producing behavior will not likely create
strong citizen support for climate change
policies unless citizens better understand that the narrative created by opponents of climate change
policies about high levels of scientific uncertainty and unacceptable harm to the economy from the adoption of climate
policies is not only false but has been manufactured by fossil
fuel companies and other entities which have economic interests in continuing high levels of fossil
fuel consumption.
Many times in articles and opinion pieces I have called for a
stronger democracy in which the power of the fossil
fuel lobby to influence
policy can be countered.
And yet, despite a long history of scientific warnings (please see Footnote 30 for a detailed description30), the many current ecological and economic impacts and crises, the future risks and dangers, the large number of international meetings and conferences on the urgent need for climate
policies and measures, and the adoption of some national and regional climate
policies, growth in global CO2 emissions from fossil
fuels and cement has not only remained
strong but is actually accelerating.
The most effective
policy for reducing CO2 emissions and oil imports from transportation is to spur the development and sale of more efficient vehicles with strict efficiency standards while increasing the cost of driving with
strong fuel taxes.