Sentences with phrase «strong global consensus»

Whether we are considering the importance of advancing innovation to business organizations or higher education research, people who are involved in these endeavors on the front lines need a vision for the future of eLearning that is built on a strong global consensus.

Not exact matches

These findings are stronger than those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations group that defines the scientific and diplomatic consensus on global warming.

Fact check: Actual scientific consensus on global warming (from real scientists that research and publish scrutinized reports) is getting stronger.

Last week, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and 10 other leading world bodies expressed the consensus view that «there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring» and that «It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities».

After reading your post, Kerry Emanuel's website I feel strongly that there is a strong consensus on hurricanes and global warming in the scientific community (in spite of media reports and advocacy statements to the contrary).

The scientific consensus over the reality and causes of global warming has grown stronger over the past decade, as reflected in the widely publicized reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Dr. Lubchenco's testimony before the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming: «The [CRU] emails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities.»

The consensus seems to be pretty strong that we have reached global peak oil now or will very soon.

There is a strong consensus that natural variability can not account for the observed global warming trend.

Or rather, the message should be in three parts: basic physics leads us to have a strong expectation that the carbon dioxide we've pumped into the atmosphere should cause global warming; the measurements that have been made bear this out; the scientific consensus about the previous two statements is overwhelming.

In fact there is a strong consensus among nations that unless nations reduce their ghg emissions to levels that represent each nation's fair share of safe global emissions, there is little hope of preventing catastrophic warming.

These findings are stronger than those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations group that defines the scientific and diplomatic consensus on global warming.

In previous entries, Ethicsandclimate.org examined the failure of the US media to communicate about: (a) the nature of the strong scientific consensus about human - induced climate change, (b) the magnitude of greenhouse gas emissions reductions necessary to prevent catastrophic climate change, (c) the practical significance for policy that follows from understanding climate change as essentially an ethical problem, (e) the consistent barrier that the United States has been to finding a global solution to climate change in international climate negotiations, and (f) the failure of the US media to help educate US citizens about the well - financed, well - organized climate change disinformation campaign.

As the lists below show, there is a stronger consensus on global warming than virtually any topic in science.

«perceived consensus was the strongest predictor of all three types of global warming views».

In terms of strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, perceived consensus was the strongest predictor of all three types of global warming views — certainty, causation, and harm / benefit.

In fact, the petition, paper, and letter were entirely unrelated to the Academy, which issued a strong denunciation of the petition project as deliberately deceptive and an affirmation of the consensus in favor of the reality of anthropogenic global warming.

The huge scientific uncertainty about the cost of inaction has obscured a surprisingly strong economic consensus about the economic cost of stabilising global CO2 concentrations at the levels currently being debated by national governments, that is, in the range 450 - 550 ppm.

A recent draft of an international consensus report offers stronger - than - ever evidence that global warming is driven by human activity.

While we found that higher expertise was associated with a greater likelihood of viewing global warming as real and harmful, this relationship was less strong than for political ideology and perceived consensus.

In analyzing responses by sub-groups, Doran found that climatologists who are active in research showed the strongest consensus on the causes of global warming, with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role.

Based on Nelder's findings at the conference, he noted that there was a strong consensus among experts (not Wall Street analysts and oil - happy bloggers), that the global peak of production is estimated to occur between 2010 and 2013.