I agree that ambition in the Australian scheme — and any other country — falls short of what is necessary for
strong global mitigation.
Not exact matches
Our study of the faster increases in apparent temperature has produced important findings for this kind of climate change impact assessment, providing a
strong scientific support for more stringent and effective climate change
mitigation efforts to combat
global warming.»
«Limiting
global warming to 1.5 or 2.0 °C requires
strong mitigation of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Strong action on
mitigation would reduce the amount of SRM necessary to maintain a stable
global temperature.
This analytical report shows the wide range of adverse impacts of climate change in Africa and assesses the balance of economic costs, as a function of a range of scenarios including both successful and failed
global mitigation efforts, and
strong compared to weak implementation of adaptation measures.
In its latest assessment of the progress of climate change, the body said: «If warming is not kept below two degrees centigrade, which will require the
strongest mitigation efforts, and currently looks very unlikely to be achieved, the substantial
global impacts will occur, such as species extinctions, and millions of people at risk from drought, hunger, flooding.»
This paper examines the levels of risk associated with three
global mitigation pathways: a
Strong 2 °C pathway, a Weak 2 °C pathway, and the G8 pathway.
This paper examines the levels of risk associated with three widely discussed
global mitigation pathways: a
Strong 2ºC pathway, a Weak 2 °C pathway, and a G8 pathway.