There are many significant variables that will have
a strong influence on climate change that are unknown.
For more info: I claim that sunspots do not have
any strong influence on the climate.
The results obtained in our study for climatic variations millions of years ago indicate, in our opinion, that the 200 - year solar cycle exerted
a strong influence on climate parameters at those time intervals as well.»
As supplier of almost all the energy in Earth's climate, the sun has
a strong influence on climate.
The other 80 % though does disprove the theory that the earth is not warming, that moonbeams are
a stronger influence on climate than CO2 etc. etc..
The other 80 % [in mainstream climate science] though does disprove the theory that the earth is not warming, that moonbeams are
a stronger influence on climate than CO2 etc. etc..
Not exact matches
The temperate, maritime
climate has a
strong influence on the country's predominantly coastal vineyards.
However, in a new paper published in Proceedings of the National of Sciences USA (PNAS) scientists from the University of Helsinki, Faculty of Science, show that key environmental parameters, namely
climate - related primary productivity, biodiversity, and pathogen stress have
strong influence on the global pattern of population densities of ethnographically documented hunter - gatherers.
So yes, right now the agricultural lobby is exerting a very
strong influence on a lot of things affecting biofuel policy, and actually other parts of policies that are related to
climate changes, so it's awkward that way.
For Cooper, these results showed both that researchers had
strong confidence in data from volunteers and revealed that the
influence of citizen science
on the study of birds and
climate change was greater than is commonly acknowledged.
Through the interactive graphic below,
Climate Central takes a look at how this major climate pattern typically influences the world's weather, what it can mean for societies in the areas it affects, and what has actually been happening with this particular event, which ranks amongst the strongest on
Climate Central takes a look at how this major
climate pattern typically influences the world's weather, what it can mean for societies in the areas it affects, and what has actually been happening with this particular event, which ranks amongst the strongest on
climate pattern typically
influences the world's weather, what it can mean for societies in the areas it affects, and what has actually been happening with this particular event, which ranks amongst the
strongest on record.
However, like many other such researchers, he has become convinced by the compelling weight of evidence indicating human
influence on climate that has unfolded over the past decade, remarking that «with each passing year the evidence has gotten
stronger — and is getting
stronger still.
A research team at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the University of Maryland, Beijing Normal University, Brookhaven National Laboratory and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem found that increases in air pollution's tiny particles in the atmosphere have a
strong influence on cloud development, which affects weather and
climate.
Climate oscillations that have a particularly strong influence on Montana's climate are the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation
Climate oscillations that have a particularly
strong influence on Montana's
climate are the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation
climate are the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO).
While
climate change was found to make drought in East Africa both more likely and
stronger, it wasn't found to be a major
influence on the drought that has caused severe water shortages in Brazil.
The solar cycle has a great
influence on space weather, and seems also to have a
strong influence on the Earth's
climate.
While the report included
strong statements pointing to a growing human
influence on climate, Mr. Bush's critics asserted that the emphasis
on unknowns gave the administration cover to avoid quickly pushing forward with actions to limit greenhouse - gas emissions.
Large changes in cosmic rays are documented in response to magnetic - field variations (the Laschamp event of about 40,000 years ago is especially prominent) with no corresponding change in
climate, so any cosmic - ray
influence on the
climate must be very small (a weak correlation can be obscured by noise; a
strong control is almost always visible «by eye,» and clearly is absent).
Another, of course, is that the science illuminating the extent of the human
influence on climate is not «settled» for many specific, and important, points, even though the basic case for rising risks from rising concentrations of greenhouse gases is robust enough to merit a
strong response, according to a host of experts (even if you take the intergovernmental panel's findings with a grain of salt).
However, like many other such researchers, he has become convinced by the compelling weight of evidence indicating human
influence on climate that has unfolded over the past decade, remarking that «with each passing year the evidence has gotten
stronger — and is getting
stronger still.
For a long time there's been a
strong perception among those of us tracking research
on human - caused global warming that meteorologists are more apt to doubt that humans could dangerously disrupt
climate than the much smaller community of climatologists studying the overall
climate system and what
influences its patterns.
In this case I did look at the slide (of Robock in # 92) in which he didn't find any
influence on climate over 20 - year periods, after correction for the diffuse light effect
on tree growth, except after quite
strong eruptions (of we had only 9 in the past 600 years + Tambora, which was an order of magnitude larger).
In particular, there is a growing realization that there are
strong interactions between degradation of near - surface permafrost and dynamics of the Earth
climate system and that these interactions may have substantial
influences on global environmental, economic, and social systems.
On the question of hurricanes, the theoretical arguments that more energy and water vapor in the atmosphere should lead to
stronger storms are really sound (after all, storm intensity increases going from pole toward equator), but determining precisely how human
influences (so including GHGs [greenhouse gases] and aerosols, and land cover change) should be changing hurricanes in a system where there are natural external (solar and volcanoes) and internal (e.g., ENSO, NAO [El Nino - Southern Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation]-RRB-
influences is quite problematic — our
climate models are just not good enough yet to carry out the types of sensitivity tests that have been done using limited area hurricane models run for relatively short times.
In comparison to these factors and trends shaping wider public opinion, past research suggests that the
influence of conservative media / commentators and Climategate
on wider public opinion is likely to be limited, reinforcing the views of the 20 % or less of the public already strongly dismissive of
climate change and holding a
strong conservative political identity.
But even with the «environmental» groups»
strong influence, the Obama Administration may not have trusted the SAB to render the invalid scientific conclusions
on climate alarmism they wanted in their Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and failed to submit their GHG Endangerment Finding to the SAB for review despite the clear need for it to do so
on such an important and influential issue.
The Third Assessment Report (TAR, 2001) concluded that temperature increases over the twenty - first century could be significantly larger than previously thought, and that the evidence for human
influence on climate change was
stronger than ever.
The report's conclusions provide robust and
strong evidence for the effects of human
influence on climate.
While a warming
climate is
influencing extreme events, by making them
stronger or more frequent, it can't be said to have «caused» an event
on its own.
In fact, they state that the data «clearly show» that «
strong natural variability has been characteristic of the Arctic at all time scales considered,» and they reiterate that the data suggest «that the human
influence on rate and size of
climate change thus far does not stand out strongly from other causes of
climate change.»»
But even more so, the tribal
influences on the demographic heavily - enough engaged to read and participate
on a
climate blog are
strong enough that very few «marketing» techniques would be even remotely effective.
Thus it's applicable to global
climate on timescales that are long compared to the time scales needed to spread the
influence of a
strong local effect to global dimensions.
IPCC fifth assessment: due to improvements in the quantitative estimates of SSTs and aerosols, we have
stronger evidence of human
influence on climate.
``... there is now
strong evidence linking specific [extreme] events or an increase in their numbers to the human
influence on climate.»
The
strong influence of natural variability
on surface air temperatures is the reason that
climate researchers regularly point out that any record shorter than around 20 - 30 years is not useful for detecting long - term trends associated with anthropogenic warming.
However, Solanki et al made the same point as we do: «This comparison shows without requiring any recourse to modeling that since roughly 1970 the solar
influence on climate (through the channels considered here) can not have been dominant» (Solanki et al., 2003), and: «Although the rarity of the current episode of high average sunspot numbers may indicate that the Sun has contributed to the unusual
climate change during the twentieth century, we point out that solar variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the
strong warming during the past three decades.»
Changes in the Atlantic overturning circulation have a
strong influence on European temperatures, North American sea level and other
climate phenomena worldwide.
These slim strips of
strong winds have a huge
influence on climate, as they can push air masses around and affect weather patterns.
Dr. John O. Roads, the director of the experimental
climate prediction center at Scripps, said that new work is showing that there are plenty of other subtle
influences on long - term weather that should eventually improve predictions, even in years without the
strong influence from the Pacific.
Hood and his references show a very
strong link between varying solar EUV / FUV and stratospheric
influence on tropospheric
climate.
Paleoclimate evidence is simply one in a number of independent lines of evidence indicating the
strong likelihood that human
influences on climate play a dominant role in the observed 20th century warming of the earth's surface.
Large ice sheets
on Greenland and in Antarctica can have
strong influence on our oceans and
on the
climate.
Because
climate's
influence on wildfire is so
strong, we are facing an inevitable trend of increasing annual area burned, and will need to learn how to adapt to more wildfire.
However, to gain insight
on the
influence of
climate change
on Atlantic tropical storm and hurricane frequency, we must focus
on longer (> 100 yr) records of Atlantic hurricane activity since very
strong year - to - year and decade - to - decade variability appears in records of Atlantic tropical cyclones.
Shifting jetstream patterns, which have a
strong influence on weather patterns in western Europe are one important component of a weather system, but only represent a change in
climate if there is an apparently permanent shift north or south.