Sentences with phrase «strong on every side of the argument»

I don't speak much about the topic because opinions are so strong on every side of the argument.

Not exact matches

It means deciding what one believes not by conforming to fashionable opinions, but by taking the trouble to learn and honestly consider the strongest arguments to be advanced on both or all sides of questions — including arguments for positions that others revile and want to stigmatize and against positions others seek to immunize from critical scrutiny.»

I'm not trying to sound like everything is relative, but I am saying these are issues that have been debated for thousands of years, and the arguments on both sides of the coin are really strong.

While the recent form of the Under - 21s side might be a strong argument against that with a group of talented young players on show, the point he makes about the Italian, Spanish and French leagues providing an obvious spine of homegrown players in their respective All - Star teams is true.

I am very strong on my convictions But I always try to understand Both sides of an argument, not to persuade someone else's feeling but to go deeper into mine, and question my own thought process.I did not say India was an ignorant country.

Asked if there is support in the PLP for a ballot, Hoon says there are «very strong views» on both sides of the argument.

And the stronger the politics, the more people on both sides of the aisle grow resistant to hearing arguments from the other side.

Such organization of arguments from the strongest to the weakest will help your readers better understand your point as well as it will convince them in to take your side on the issue / topic.

I'm usually on the side of not having combat in a horror game but the counterbalance of sanity in Phantasmal is a strong argument for its inclusion.

If there is one comment that makes a strong argument on a particular point and many comments that argue the opposite side of that point with weak technical or purely emotional arguments who wins?

On both sides of the climate debate, those with a strong position either way tend to use the facts (as they see them) to debug logical arguments instead of vice versa.

I'd just ask that those making strong arguments on the latter, on both sides of the so - called debate, would come clean on their motivations on the former too.

On the one hand, a permissive stance toward new arguments by tribunals on appeal serves the interests of justice insofar as it ensures that a reviewing court is presented with the strongest arguments in favour of both sides... This remains true even if those arguments were not included in the tribunal's original reasonOn the one hand, a permissive stance toward new arguments by tribunals on appeal serves the interests of justice insofar as it ensures that a reviewing court is presented with the strongest arguments in favour of both sides... This remains true even if those arguments were not included in the tribunal's original reasonon appeal serves the interests of justice insofar as it ensures that a reviewing court is presented with the strongest arguments in favour of both sides... This remains true even if those arguments were not included in the tribunal's original reasons.

Any discussion about life insurance as an investment after you retire is certain to draw strong opinions on both sides of the argument.