Jeffrey Burton Russell
points out that among historians
of science «there's a
strong debate going on between those who understand that the development
of science is basically a Western European phenomenon, and that this is because
of its Christian or Judeo - Christian roots, and those who maintain that
religion blocked the progress
of science until the 18th and 19th centuries, and that [science has] to struggle against
religion.
While the impact
of these classical theories has remained
strong, I would like to
point to a specific contribution that, in my view, has served as a kind
of watershed in our thinking about the cultural dimension
of religion: Clifford Geertz's essay «
Religion as a Cultural System,» published in 1966.1 Although Geertz, an anthropologist, was concerned in this essay with many issues that lay on the fringes
of sociologists» interests, his writing is clear and incisive, the essay displays exceptional erudition, and it provides not only a concise definition
of religion but also a
strong epistemological and philosophical defense
of the importance
of religion as a topic
of inquiry.
Dhogoza, I don't think you can
point the finger at
religion — conservative or otherwise — but I have noticed a tendency
of many advocates
of Intelligent Design to adopt a
strong version
of the Anthropic Principle in arguments against climate change.