We take
a strong position on climate change, sustainability, resilience, and adaptation.»
Not exact matches
But any objective comparison would show that Trudeau's
position on climate change is far
stronger than Trump's.
Everyone clearly thought
climate change was important and was
on board with coming up with a solution, but no one, at least at this forum, wanted to go out
on a limb and stake out an
strong or at the least bit adversarial
position.
That said, once a serious US policy
on carbon /
climate change is implemented, the US will have a
stronger negotiating
position since the developing economies will have nothing left to say.
His
position: • No evidence of increasing lake clarity as a result of secchi measurements since 1946 • The interplay of stratification and plankton productivity are not «straightforward» • Challenges O'Reilly's assumption
on the correlation of wind and productivity - the highest production is
on the end of the lake with the lowest winds • A
strong caution using diatoms as the productivity proxy (it is one of two different lake modes) • No ability to link climate change to productivity changes • More productivity from river than allowed for in Nature Geopscience article • Externally derived nutrients control productivity for a quarter of the year • Strong indications of overfishing • No evidence of a climate and fishery production link • The current productivity of the lake is within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea of declining product
strong caution using diatoms as the productivity proxy (it is one of two different lake modes) • No ability to link
climate change to productivity
changes • More productivity from river than allowed for in Nature Geopscience article • Externally derived nutrients control productivity for a quarter of the year •
Strong indications of overfishing • No evidence of a climate and fishery production link • The current productivity of the lake is within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea of declining product
Strong indications of overfishing • No evidence of a
climate and fishery production link • The current productivity of the lake is within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially
changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that
changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea of declining productivity.
The Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change has a monopoly on the provision of climate policy advice at the international level and a strong market position in national policy
Climate Change has a monopoly
on the provision of
climate policy advice at the international level and a strong market position in national policy
climate policy advice at the international level and a
strong market
position in national policy advice.
In the last two entries we examined the failure of the US media to communicate about: (1) the
strong scientific
position on climate change, and (2) the magnitude of greenhouse gas emissions reduction necessary to avoid catastrophic
climate impacts.
For this reason, the IPCC consensus
position is entitled to
strong respect that, at the very minimum,
climate change poses a legitimate significant threat to human well - being and the natural resources
on which life depends.
Since becoming governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo has staked out a
position as a
strong advocate of action
on climate change.
The Post «s opinion section creates a
strong perception that «
climate change is in doubt» that is at odds with reputable scientific research and at odds with the
position on climate change taken by every single relevant scientific institution globally (with the exception of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists).
Based
on campaign pledges, backed up early
on by
strong choices for advisor and department
positions for anything even tangentially related to
climate change, Barack Obama brought the United States back into the
climate change fight.