Even worse, NCLB, far from unleashing major new choice initiatives as was originally hoped, is instead threatening the future of many
struggling urban charter schools.
Not exact matches
The true cost of
charter expansion has not been a matter of revenue, but rather the
struggle of eliminating excess capacity and rightsizing an
urban school district.»
are
struggling with them in wealthy and in middle - and low - income
schools; in rural, suburban, and
urban districts; in magnet, regular, district,
charter, parochial, and independent
schools; along the coasts, in the American heartland, from south to north, and everywhere in between.»
• Despite our national
struggle to create high - performing nonselective - admissions
urban high
schools, six D.C.
charter high
schools made Tier - 1 status.
The statement includes a list of these developments: the US Supreme Court ruled scholarships constitutional; numerous studies showed these programs benefit needy kids; families empowered with this choice express great satisfaction;
urban districts continue to
struggle despite great effort;
chartering hasn't created enough high - quality seats; and smart accountability systems can ensure only high - quality private
schools participate in these programs.
In too many
urban communities,
charters have hastened the closing of Catholic
schools, in part because Catholic
schools have
struggled to adapt to the challenges of this new era of increased competition.
are
struggling with them in wealthy and in middle - and low - income
schools; in rural, suburban, and
urban districts; in magnet, regular, district,
charter, parochial, and independent
schools; along the coasts, in the American heartland, from south to north, and...
Memphis is not the first diocese to work with
charter leaders to «convert»
struggling urban Catholic
schools into public
charter schools, but its «conversions» are certainly the most prominent.
Urban charter schools in Massachusetts are delivering for minority, economically disadvantaged, special education and ELL students in a way that is historically unprecedented in the long
struggle for equitable education in the United States.
But it's by no means guaranteed; we must bear in mind that despite a half century of
urban - district
struggles, many public - education advocates still oppose
charter schooling.
The Moody's report highlights a couple of
school districts with serious financial health issues predating
charters that are
struggling to adapt, but essentially ignores the many other
urban districts where public
charters and the district are able to grow together and thrive in fine financial health.
These ideas — choice,
charter schools, vouchers — have all gained a foothold to one degree or another in
struggling urban districts across the country, including in DeVos» own home turf of Detroit, where more than half of public
school students now attend
charter schools.
Beyond that, comparing
charter schools with
struggling urban schools around them doesn't say much about quality on an objective basis, Baker said.
They also argued the rankings set a low bar for academic quality by comparing
charter schools with local public districts, many of which are
struggling urban schools, rather than with top - performing
schools elsewhere.
And on top of all that, he's the head of a
struggling urban school system that many argue has been hurt even more by a fast - growing
charter sector.
Rabinowitz questioned whether the embattled
charter organization, also known as Family
Urban Schools of Excellence, should continue running Dunbar School under a year - old arrangement through the state Commissioner's Network, a reform initiative that gives millions in extra funding to struggling schools that implement a three - to 5 - year «turnaround»
Schools of Excellence, should continue running Dunbar
School under a year - old arrangement through the state Commissioner's Network, a reform initiative that gives millions in extra funding to
struggling schools that implement a three - to 5 - year «turnaround»
schools that implement a three - to 5 - year «turnaround» plan.
Apparently, «the 1 percent» includes the
struggling, poverty - stricken students in
urban ghettos like Compton and Watts — the students that the union has tried to trap in failing
schools through their opposition to
charters.
Charter supporters say the system meets demand for high - quality education that regularly arises in economically distressed parts of the city, paving the way for innovation in a
struggling urban school system.