As mentioned in last week's Capitol Connection, Harkin's bill eliminates the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) model and allows states to use the accountability and teacher evaluation systems in place under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) waivers or to create new systems that establish their own
student academic performance standards.
Charter school researcher Alison Consoletti (2011) reports that 1,036 charter schools (15 percent of the total number opened since the first school in 1992) have been closed for cause, including 42 percent for financial deficiencies often related to low student enrollment, 24 percent for mismanagement such as administrators» misuse of funds, and 19 percent for failure to meet
student academic performance standards.
They must have a plan to help educationally disadvantaged students and ensure that
student academic performance standards and requirements meet or exceed state requirements.
Not exact matches
It came after a cascade of dissent from parents and teachers, steadily growing since tests aligned with the Common Core
academic standards were introduced into classrooms in the 2012 - 13 school year and since the state toughened its evaluation laws, with an increasing amount of educators» job ratings linked to
student performance on exams.
What's important is that
students take assessments aligned to their state
standards so that parents and teachers received valuable and honest information about their
academic performance.»
Last year, at the National Education Summit, governors and business leaders concluded that «efforts to set clear, common...
academic standards for
students in a given school district or state are necessary to improve
student performance.».
Specifically, they agreed to develop
academic standards and assessments in every state and to expand the use of information technology as a way to improve
student performance and aid in the measurement of
student achievement.
The assessment will continue to use
performance standards — basic, proficient, and advanced — and a mix of multiple - choice and open - response test items in assessing the
academic achievement of U.S.
students.
Over time,
students will build the necessary skills to analyze more complex documents, text, and
academic vocabulary, raising
performance with the Common Core ELA
standards.
State and federal school accountability programs hold schools to specific
standards of
academic performance and assume each school is given a fair shake at accomplishing the task of educating its
students.
It will give one of the grants, a $ 1.45 million gift, to the Education Development Center in Newton, Mass., to help eight school districts determine whether a
standards - based approach can produce «significant improvement» in
students»
academic performance.
In light of the ongoing push to establish common
academic standards across states, the authors examined data from the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress to see whether citizen ratings of school quality are responsive to the level of
student performance relative to the nation as a whole or only relative to other schools within the same state.
In terms of
academic performance, KIPP
students» achievement in grade 4 (before entering KIPP) is lower than the district average by 0.09
standard deviations in reading and by 0.08
standard deviations in math, or roughly one - quarter of a grade level in each subject.
The proposal being designed by the panel's Republican leaders would share a central feature of the Clinton Administration's Goals 2000 strategy — a requirement that states and school districts adopt challenging
academic -
performance standards and assessments with which to measure
students» progress toward meeting them.
In their portfolios, Salvin says, «teachers must have evidence of their
students satisfying our critical
academic skills, which are the
performance standards of project - based learning at the school and the schoolwide initiatives.»
(California, for example, has had impressive
academic standards for years, and yet its
student performance remains weak.)
the State designated
performance level on a State elementary assessment in social studies administered prior to the 2010 - 2011 school year; provided that beginning in the 2010 - 2011 school year, at which time a State elementary assessment in social studies shall no longer be administered, a school shall provide
academic intervention services when
students are determined to be at risk of not achieving State learning
standards in social studies pursuant to subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph;
Originally enacted by the California Legislature in 1971, the Stull Act requires school districts to evaluate the
performance of teachers and other certificated employees using multiple measures of
performance, including
student progress toward district and state
academic content
standards, as measured by standardized tests.
The bill also eliminates goals and
performance targets for
academic achievement, removes parameters regarding the use of federal funds to help improve struggling schools, does not address key disparities in opportunity such as access to high - quality college preparatory curricula, restricts the federal government from protecting disadvantaged
students, does not address poor quality tests, and fails to advance the current movement toward college - and career - ready
standards.
Schools seldom have coherent content
standards, accountability systems based on assessments of
student academic growth, or an ethic of making publicly available the
performance data that do exist.
The bill replaces AYP
standards with a requirement for states to annually measure all
students and individual subgroups by: (1)
academic achievement as measured by state assessments; (2) for high schools, graduation rates; (3) for schools that are not high schools, a measure of
student growth or another valid and reliable statewide indicator; (4) if applicable, progress in achieving English proficiency by English learners; and (5) at least one additional valid and reliable statewide indicator that allows for meaningful differentiation in school
performance.
The growing number of states that are choosing to give their own exams, coupled with the different definitions of «proficient» on PARCC tests, is unraveling one of the central promises of the Common Core
academic standards — the idea that states would have the same math and reading
standards and use the same tests, making it possible to directly compare
student performance across state lines.
Unlike No Child Left Behind, which had the goal of all
students being proficient by 2014 (less than 14 months away), D.C. officials are implementing new, lower
standards of
academic performance for African American, Latino, and poor children compared to their more affluent White and Asian counterparts.
His vision, outlined in a speech to a Little Rock civic group earlier this month, calls for raising
academic standards by requiring more rigorous course requirements for graduation, linking teacher pay raises to
student performance, and restructuring the state's accountability system to include annual spring testing.
By accountability, we mean that every school or education provider - at least every one that accepts public dollars - should subscribe to a coherent set of rigorous, statewide
academic standards, statewide assessments of
student and school
performance, and a statewide system of incentives and interventions tied to results.
Examining
students»
performance on the ITBS in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades enables us to see how their gains in reading from 3rd to 4th grade, and in math from 4th to 5th grade, were affected by their teachers» grading
standards that
academic year.
Superintendents acknowledge that federal and state
standards and accountability systems have created a situation in which district and school personnel can not ignore evidence about
students who are struggling or failing to meet mandated
standards for
academic performance, as reflected in test results and other indicators of
student success (e.g., attendance, graduation rates).
This report focused on the inability of existing evaluation tools to distinguish between different levels of educator
performance, finding, among other things, that nearly all teachers were rated as «good» or «great,» even in schools where
students failed to meet basic
academic standards.
• Evidence - Based method:
Academic research on
student performance is used to identify needed resources to meet all state
standards.
Research behind VAL - ED (the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education tool to assess principal
performance, developed by researchers at Vanderbilt University) suggests that there are six key steps - or «processes» - that the effective principal takes when carrying out his or her most important leadership responsibilities: planning, implementing, supporting, advocating, communicating and monitoring.40 The school leader pressing for high
academic standards would, for example, map out rigorous targets for improvements in learning (planning), get the faculty on board to do what's necessary to meet those targets (implementing), encourage
students and teachers in meeting the goals (supporting), challenge low expectations and low district funding for
students with special needs (advocating), make sure families are aware of the learning goals (communicating), and keep on top of test results (monitoring).41
Most of the states that first endorsed the Common Core
academic standards are still using them in some form, despite continued debate over whether they are improving
student performance in reading and math.
The likelihood that
students will achieve the aims of the
standards will be substantially shaped by how well teachers teach challenging
academic Read more about
Student Performance Assessments and Teacher Learning -LSB-...]
«Mississippi has built a strong foundation for its public education system that includes rigorous
academic standards for all
students, aligned assessments to evaluate
student achievement and an accountability model that clearly measures the
performance of our schools and districts.
This primary purpose is similar to the original 1968 Bilingual Education Act, which states that limited - English - proficient (LEP)
students will be educated to «meet the same rigorous
standards for
academic performance expected of all children and youth, including meeting challenging state content
standards and challenging state
student performance standards in
academic areas.»
Charter schools and test scores fit into four broad goals that Obama wants states to pursue - tougher
academic standards, better ways to recruit and keep effective teachers, a method of tracking
student performance and a plan of action to turn around failing schools.
• Hold them to the same
academic standards and
student performance assessments as other public schools.
«CCSA has led the way for increased accountability by raising
standards that value
academic rigor, while also giving schools credit for
academic growth, and for taking on the challenge of serving traditionally disadvantaged
students,» said Elizabeth Robitaille, senior vice president of Achievement and
Performance Management, CCSA.
The proposed legislation, which hits the House floor this afternoon, would have two key effects: prohibit the possibility of engaging in a new, substantial mechanism to compare NC
students»
academic performance with that of
students in other states; and authorize the creation of a review commission composed of parents, educators, and other stakeholders to review alternative
standards and recommend them for adoption.
Performance Standard 1: Instructional Leadership The principal fosters the success of all
students by facilitating the development, communication, implementation, and evaluation of a shared vision of teaching and learning that leads to
student academic progress and school improvement.
Measuring
student academic performance by
standard such as the ones outlined in the CCSS is different than more traditional grading methods that are used in most middle and high schools.
Performance Standard 1: Mission, Vision, and Goals The superintendent works with the local school board to formulate and implement the school division's mission, vision, and goals to promote
student academic progress.
The Code of Virginia requires that (1) principal evaluations be consistent with the
performance objectives (standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student academi
performance objectives (
standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for Uniform
Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student academi
Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address
student academic progress.
The Code of Virginia requires that (1) superintendent evaluations be consistent with the
performance objectives (standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student academi
performance objectives (
standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for Uniform
Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student academi
Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address
student academic progress.
Performance Standard 3: Instructional Leadership The superintendent fosters the success of all teachers, staff, and
students by ensuring the development, communication, implementation, and evaluation of effective teaching and learning that leads to
student academic progress and school improvement.
Performance Standard 4: Assessment of and for
Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the schoo
Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure
student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the schoo
student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both
students and parents throughout the school year.
SB 645, authored by Senator Joe Simitian (D - Palo Alto), would create new and more stringent
academic accountability requirements for charter schools, while raising
standards for
student performance and outcomes.
The illustration provides a snapshot of
student achievement using
standards - based grading, and captures each
students» status, or the
academic performance of each
student, at a single point in time.
Performance Standard 7:
Student Academic Progress The principal's leadership results in acceptable, measurable student academic progress based on established sta
Student Academic Progress The principal's leadership results in acceptable, measurable student academic progress based on established st
Academic Progress The principal's leadership results in acceptable, measurable
student academic progress based on established sta
student academic progress based on established st
academic progress based on established
standards.
Conditions of learning, local
performance goals,
student engagement, delivery of
academic standards, are some of the others.
This would give teachers time to learn the instructional shifts required to teach for higher
academic standards while some of the issues around measuring
student performance are worked out.