Cooper Union's Board of Trustees proposed a Code of Conduct that would obliterate the power of students in
the student judiciary system, give autonomous and arbitrary punitive power to a few select administrators, and create an oppressive and threatening environment where censorship limits...
Not exact matches
Among the things that people have told us they expect to find in the United States: a
judiciary where they can get a fair shake; a free press that investigates broadly and exposes wrongdoing wherever it occurs; auditors who probe accounting records and promptly report irregularities; physicians who are not beholden to pharmaceutical companies; colleges and universities where
students can study widely, switch fields and not remain indebted for decades; and finally a political
system where you can succeed without having to sell your soul to wealthy supporters.
Despite the courts having played an integral role in serving as a check against states not acting in the interests of all
students for nearly four decades, Sessions» campaign against judicial oversight of legislative actions prevented the
judiciary from resolving inequities in the Alabama education
system.54
«a new revolutionary era of permissiveness in this country fostered by the
judiciary... I wish, therefore, wholly to disclaim any purpose on my part to hold that the Federal Constitution compels the teachers, parents, and elected school officials to surrender control of the American public school
system to public school
students.»
Over the next few months I propose to write a few entries dealing with the use of electronic technology in the litigation process and with Simon's permission have them appear on Slaw, with the hope that such posts will spark a full discussion between the
judiciary, the legal profession, academics and law
students on the value and use of electronic technology in the judicial
system.
Of the various segments identified in the opening paragraph (lawyers, judges, ministry of justice officials, law professors and law
students), it is the
judiciary which has the ability to impose and enforce rules, to ration court resources and to steward the process of reforming the
system which they, ultimately, run.