«That is a very heavy responsibility and we feel that it's a very valuable one to be able to achieve high
student outcome results and to develop other teachers to become excellent teachers,» says Swartz.
Not exact matches
The
results of our survey indicate that when
students believe that they can meet their parents» expectations, there is a statistically significant correlation with the following
student outcomes:
To help achieve the Governor's goal of encouraging efficiency and
results, the Executive Budget allocates $ 250 million to be awarded on a competitive basis to school districts that demonstrate significant improvement in their
student performance
outcomes and another $ 250 million to be awarded on a competitive basis to school districts that undertake long - term structural changes which reduce costs and improve efficiency.
Results underscore need for action to improve
outcomes for historically under - served groups of
students and importance of maintaining accurate and high expectations for all
students
It's an ongoing process, but better standards, better curriculum and better tests will
result in better
student outcomes.»
The inter-professional model of care will
result in enhanced patient satisfaction, and improved health
outcomes while increasing dental
student awareness of urban health issues.»
But those
results were widely criticized by educators and software makers for lumping together the
outcomes from many different products and for testing their impact on
student achievement in the 1st year the teacher had used the material.
This
outcome could
result from gains in understanding during discussion, or simply from peer influence of knowledgeable
students on their neighbors.
This
result is an
outcome of a long term effort that Bañados joined as a Ph. D.
student at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Fabian Walters group.
It is
student attainment
outcomes which suffer as a
result of this fear.»
In theory, retained
students were supposed to participate in an enriched, accelerated academic program that would, through additional help and tailor - made interventions,
result in a better
outcome at the end of the repeated grade or even help the
student catch up to his or her classmates.
Even if we ignore the fact that most portfolio managers, regulators, and other policy makers rely on the level of test scores (rather than gains) to gauge quality, math and reading achievement
results are not particularly reliable indicators of whether teachers, schools, and programs are improving later - life
outcomes for
students.
-
Student help sheet which gives step - by - step guidance to carry out each of the tasks (IDEAL for non-specialist teachers)- Answer /
outcome document so you can see what the
result should be and whether tasks have been completed correctly.
To help
students continue using self - assessment while becoming more independent, guide them to recognize progress and positive
outcomes resulting from their insights and efforts.
The low public regard for teacher unions is, I would argue, a
result of public perceptions that concern for
student outcomes ranks very low relative to the income, convenience, and preferences of the teachers themselves.
Too often, teachers tend to blame «undesirable»
outcomes or academic
results on
student absence, attitude to learning, or social / behavioural factors.
Importantly, as our
results show, predicted increases in per - pupil spending induced by SFRs are correlated not only with actual spending increases, but with improved
outcomes for
students as well.
The
student component of NELS includes additional
outcome data for the subjects taught by each sampled teacher, including the
results from multiple - choice achievement tests.
This worksheet helps hammer home to
students that there are 36 possible
outcomes (not 12) when rolling two dice and adding the
results.
While there may be other mechanisms through which increased school spending improves
student outcomes, these
results suggest that the positive effects are driven, at least in part, by some combination of reductions in class size, having more adults per
student in schools, increases in instructional time, and increases in teacher salaries that may help to attract and retain a more highly qualified teaching workforce.
Regardless, our
results indicate that, under a robust system of performance evaluation, the turnover of teachers can generate meaningful gains in
student outcomes, particularly for the most disadvantaged
students.
As such, he argues that, if our
results are correct and school spending really does improve
student outcomes (with larger effects for low - income children),
outcomes should have improved over time and achievement gaps by income should have been eliminated over this time period.
Controlling statistically for differences in
student characteristics avoids crediting schools for producing
outcomes that are instead the
result of differences in the
students that attend them.
Report comments and application marks were based on the
outcomes of the
students»
results.
What are some improvements in
student learning
outcomes you've seen as a
result of blended learning, Catlin?
The primary
results are based on comparing the
outcomes for
students just above and just below the score cutoff for double - dose assignment (11,507
students).
Turning to
student outcomes, however, our
results provide little evidence that attending a G&T magnet program leads to improvements in
student achievement (see Figure 3).
Research has shown that closing the teacher diversity gap
results in better
outcomes for
students of color, and teachers who share
students» backgrounds can serve as powerful role models.
If you are not persuaded by the evidence I reviewed yesterday on the disconnect between achievement
results and other
outcomes, I suggest you read an excellent book written by Nobel Prize winning economist James Heckman and his
students called The Myth of Achievement Tests.
The
results also confirmed the positive relationship of key characteristics of professional - development design identified in previous studies over the past decade to
student outcomes: sustained, active teacher learning that is coherently aligned with the school's organization.
But you don't emphasize an important point: Whatever benefits
students experienced in kindergarten that
resulted in higher test scores, they did not cause higher test scores in later grades — even though they produced better later - life
outcomes.
Random assignment helps eliminate concerns that program
outcomes result from the selection of
students, to which Rothstein attributes the apparent success of many reform claims.
This crazy
outcome — whereby
students enjoy more rights than their teachers do — is the
result of free - speech confusion going all the way back to Tinker and its declaration that
students don't abandon their rights «at the schoolhouse door.»
Consider the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 — a brilliant piece of bipartisan politics and sweeping policy, which
resulted in better
student data and more accountable school systems (even if improvements in
student outcomes were modest).
So,
outcome - based monitoring should be directed at whether the evaluations that IDEA requires are performed on time, by competent and disinterested people, in an unbiased way, and with
resulting application to the
student's educational program and placement.
Online and blended learning have the potential to dramatically transform our education system by being able to individualize for each
student's distinct learning needs (just look at the
results from Carpe Diem, KIPP Empower, or Rocketship Education), but whether it does so will have a lot to do with policy — whether we change the incentives and focus not on merely serving
students and micro-managing the inputs, but instead focusing on the
student outcomes and leaving behind an antiquated factory - model system for a
student - centric one.
The power of parents to move their disabled child out of a failing program would likely improve the
outcomes for that child and motivate more teachers and administrators to achieve positive
results for their
students with disabilities.
Australia achieves relatively strong education
results at an aggregate level, yet many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
students experience poor educational
outcomes.
AEI's Rick Hess and
Results for America's Bethany Little recently released a set of recommendations for a bipartisan «moneyball» approach to education, one that would help state and local school systems use data and evidence to improve
student outcomes.
Research, including 2008 and 2009 studies by Eric Hanushek, John Kain, and me, and a 2000 study by Caroline Hoxby that account for both observed and unobserved factors that could affect
outcomes and contaminate the
results, suggests that African Americans, particularly higher achievers, do benefit from attending schools with a higher proportion of white
students.
A common
outcome of that artificiality is that teachers feel disappointed in the quality of writing turned in because the
students are capable of better
results.
Each research design has different strengths and weaknesses, but the fact that they all produce similar
results suggests that we have obtained good evidence on the causal effect of high - school teachers» expectations on
student outcomes.
The end
result of this was that for each of the schools we were able to map in diagrammatic form the links between that professional autonomy and improved
outcomes for
students.
The first screen would focus on
student outcomes — test scores, growth metrics, and other gauges that demonstrate that the school is in fact getting excellent
results.
These
outcomes are consistent with the
result that charter schools have significantly better
results than TPS for minority
students who are in poverty.
To call attention to some district schools that have adopted blended learning and boosted
student outcomes, we at the Christensen Institute have partnered with the Evergreen Education Group to profile district schools with measurable positive
student results from having adopted blended learning.
As a
result, simple comparisons of
student outcomes in municipal, stand - alone, and network schools might give misleading estimates of the impact of schools on
student achievement, even after adjusting for the measured characteristics of the
students who attend each type of school.
When implementing this approach, we only compare the
outcomes of
students for whom the same pair of teachers is making the assessments to ensure that our
results are not biased by certain kinds of
students being assigned to teachers with especially high (or low) expectations.
According to a recent implementation study with the John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities at Stanford University, Aim High is helping
students reach positive
outcomes, and the teaching and instructional practices
result in «increased self - efficacy, or the belief in one's ability to succeed» for its
students.
These observations should be of concern because the evidence is clear that the world's highest - performing nations in international achievement studies consistently attract more able people into teaching,
resulting in better
student outcomes.