Sentences with phrase «student spending increased»

«Between fiscal years 1992 and 2014, inflation adjusted («real») per - student spending increased by 27 percent.

Not exact matches

At Wharton, Ulrich says, he has seen increasing numbers of students spend their summers in San Francisco developing their startups and then participating in Wharton's Semester in San Francisco during the fall — a program he pioneered a couple years ago to continue the foundation built during the summer.

The commission recommended several reforms including reforming civilian and military retirement programs, reducing agricultural program spending, eliminating in - school subsidies in federal student loan programs, and giving the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation the authority to increase premiums.

I reported some 14 months ago that there would be sharp increases in the number of muslim suits in the employment, and student sectors, based on the year I spent undercover in a local seattle mosque.

The Productivity Commission is correct that dollars spent per student increased by 14 % in real terms over the last decade.

In a draft report, the Productivity Commission says that education spending has substantially increased over the past decade but student achievement has shown little improvement, and in some areas has declined.

The Productivity Commission has said that education spending has substantially increased over the last decade but student achievement has shown little or no improvement.

Finally, in Houston in 2010 — 11, he gave cash incentives to fifth - grade students in 25 low - performing public schools, as well as to the parents and teachers of those students, with the intent of increasing the time they spent on math homework and improving their scores on standardized math tests.

For instance, some studies show that time spent on homework for elementary school students has increased slightly since the 1980s and decreased for older students, she said.

The Productivity Commission has said that education spending has substantially increased over the last decade but student achievement has shown little or no improvement.

New York spent $ 21,206 per pupil compared to a national average of $ 11,392 in school year 2014 - 2015.38 Better targeting spending to the highest needs districts would contain costs while ensuring that all students have access to a sound basic education.39 The State wastes $ 1.2 billion annually on property tax rebates and allocates $ 4 billion annually on economic development spending with a sparse record of results.40 Curtailing spending in these areas would reduce pressure to increase taxes and lessen the tax differential with other states.

In 1999, Pelosi voted against the Ten Commandments being displayed in public buildings, including schools [105] Pelosi voted for the No Child Left Behind Act, which instituted testing to track students» progress and authorized an increase in overall education spending.

The state spending per non-public student has also increased since Cuomo took office.

New government report shows massive $ 9.7 billion increase in education spending provided no improvement for Washington students

The Council is calling for a reassessment of spending on homeless shelters and for education spending to be increased to «Fair Student Funding» levels.

In the tough bargaining around the 2010 spending round, I managed to ease some of the political pain of increasing student tuition fees by channelling more resources into apprenticeships.

Should we keep increasing total spending on education as we face a steep decline in the number of students in our public education system?

«It is unfortunate that DOE is trying to stifle the autonomy of charter schools when their time would be better spent on evaluating what great teachers and leaders in the very best charter schools, traditional district schools and nonprofit providers are doing to make pre-kindergarten an investment that pays off in increased student achievement,» Merriman said.

Since 2009, the board has made major cuts to the public schools, eliminating over 400 positions and reducing kindergarten to a half day while increasing spending on special education and transportation for private school students.

It was a good move by both the federal governments and the Länder (states) to agree on two new goals: increasing the number of foreign students by 50 % and doubling the number of German students who spend time abroad during their studies.

O'Brien also notes that students are facing increasing competition so they're spending much more time working on their grades and resumes, instead of socializing.

Given the lengthening time - to - degree for graduate students and the increasing time spent in postdoc positions, for many, stipends might constitute 25 % to 30 % of a young scientist's lifetime income!

Researchers Colleen M. Grogan, a professor in UChicago's School of Social Service Administration, and Sunggeun (Ethan) Park, a doctoral student in the school, found that those with a connection to Medicaid were more likely to view the program as important and to support increases in spending than those with no connection.

- Living in the middle - class area was associated with a 69 percent increased risk for nearsightedness, even after adjusting for other risk factors, such as time spent reading, outdoor activity and whether the student's parents wore glasses.

It's the same situation in North America: increasing tuition fees, life spending and low salaries for young graduation students all lead to the «sugar daddies / mommies dating».

A new, in - depth report takes a look at how states spend education money and finds that the most cost - effective ways of increasing student achievement are by reducing pupil - teacher ratios, providing more prekindergarten programs, and providing teachers with discretionary classroom resources — not by raising teacher pay.

In response to the lawsuit, Arizona modestly increased its funding for ELL students and adopted a new policy requiring them to spend four hours a day in special language classes.

Putting all of this together, the authors find that a 10 percent increase in institutional spending per student leads to a 3 percent increase in enrollment and even larger percentage increases in degree completion one to three years later.

Specifically, does the marginal dollar spent on higher education have a bigger impact on enrollment and completion if it is used to reduce the sticker prices students face, or instead to increase institutional expenditures that affect the experience they receive once they enroll?

[3] But what makes it particularly valuable is that it directly compares the impact of reducing sticker prices versus increasing institutional spending per student — and does so using a rigorous methodology that allows an estimate of causal effects, rather than just correlations between tuition, institutional spending, and student outcomes.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates an increase in Pell spending of $ 21 billion from 2010 to 2014, with an additional $ 15 billion earmarked for students by 2019.

We address those limitations and demonstrate that, in fact, when examined in the right way, it becomes clear that increased school spending is linked to improved outcomes for students, and for low - income students in particular.

The original legislation called for major increases in education spending to offset the cost of reaching NCLB's ambitious goals for student achievement, but federal spending never reached the lofty levels outlined in the law.

Importantly, as our results show, predicted increases in per - pupil spending induced by SFRs are correlated not only with actual spending increases, but with improved outcomes for students as well.

Given that money per se will not necessarily improve student outcomes (for example, using the funds to pay for lavish faculty retreats or to shore up employee pension funds will likely not have a large positive effect on student outcomes), understanding how the increased funding was spent is key to understanding why we find large spending effects where others do not.

We do not find that merely increasing spending will improve student outcomes irrespective of how it is spent.

While there may be other mechanisms through which increased school spending improves student outcomes, these results suggest that the positive effects are driven, at least in part, by some combination of reductions in class size, having more adults per student in schools, increases in instructional time, and increases in teacher salaries that may help to attract and retain a more highly qualified teaching workforce.

Specifically, increasing per - pupil spending by 10 percent in all 12 school - age years increases the probability of high school graduation by 7 percentage points for all students, by roughly 10 percentage points for low - income children, and by 2.5 percentage points for nonpoor children.

We also examine the effects of court - mandated spending increases on three commonly used proxies for school quality: the length of the school year, teacher salaries, and student - teacher ratios.

Specifically, spending increases associated with court - mandated reform are much more strongly related to improvement in measured school inputs (e.g., student - to - teacher ratios, length of the school year) than ordinary spending increases.

Increased per - pupil spending also has a positive effect on exposed students» family income in adulthood.

The report suggests that quicker progress was related to students spending more time on homework, which is related to the increased enjoyment of using interactive and video resources, as well as increased engagement with their own learning.

Americans with more accurate knowledge of school spending also tend to be less confident that increased spending will improve student learning.

Healthy Choices is a school - based nutrition and physical activity program in Massachusetts designed to increase middle - school students fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity as well as reduce the amount of time they spend in front of the television.

A stated desire to increase the amount of time students spend in school should be compelling enough justification for a waiver from this misguided policy.

But my students» performance on the district midterms and finals is relatively mediocre because I skimp on the mandated curriculum — in Fall 2005, because we spend time on Hurricane Katrina instead, and in Spring 2006 because students want to investigate the increase in youth violence in their neighborhood.»

Predicted spending increases are also associated with greater probabilities of high school graduation, with larger effects for low - income students than for their nonpoor peers.

The amount of money that colleges spend per student has increased significantly.

Between 1994 and 2004, the percentage of students with disabilities spending 80 percent or more of the school day in a regular classroom showed an overall increase of 5 percent, which shows that our nations schools are moving in the right direction but still have a long way to go to ensure a quality education for an increasingly diverse student population.

Also, instructional per - pupil spending has increased in all affected public school districts, contradicting the belief that school choice programs take money away from public school students, the report says.