Revised AMOs culminate with all students and
student subgroups achieving pass rates of at least 78 percent in reading and 73 percent by 2016 - 2017.
Not exact matches
Similarly, we urge those states that base a portion of their grade on the progress of low -
achieving students, or other
subgroups, not to overdo it.
[The Delaware Department of Education] proposes to decrease the percentage of non-proficient
students in each
subgroup by 50 % by 2030, which would result in no more than half to two - third of certain
subgroups of
students achieving proficiency.
Annually measures, for all
students and separately for each
subgroup of
students, the following indicators: Academic achievement (which, for high schools, may include a measure of
student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a measure of
student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and reliable statewide academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in
achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide indicator of school quality or
student success; and
The bill replaces AYP standards with a requirement for states to annually measure all
students and individual
subgroups by: (1) academic achievement as measured by state assessments; (2) for high schools, graduation rates; (3) for schools that are not high schools, a measure of
student growth or another valid and reliable statewide indicator; (4) if applicable, progress in
achieving English proficiency by English learners; and (5) at least one additional valid and reliable statewide indicator that allows for meaningful differentiation in school performance.
How do these practices differ for
student subgroups, such as
students with disabilities, English language learners, and low -
achieving students?
For this reason, we also examine two U.S.
subgroups conventionally thought to have better preparation for school — white
students and
students from families where at least one parent is reported to have received a college degree — and compare the percentages of high -
achieving students among them to the (total) populations abroad.
Are all and
subgroups of
students achieving proficiency in science?
Are all and
subgroups of
students achieving proficiency or meeting expected growth targets in other curricular areas or educational programs?
In return, the state must lay out plans for improving performance of the lowest -
achieving schools and
student subgroups, including African - American
students and
students with disabilities.
During the transformation, Fruita Middle School was the only middle school in the district recognized for
achieving student growth above the state median in every tested subject, in all grades, and with every demographic
subgroup of
students measured by the State of Colorado.
Indiana currently looks at the lowest
achieving 25 percent of
students instead of tracking specific
subgroups.
Although its
students appeared to
achieve well on assessments, the district was concerned that buried within the high scores were
subgroups not benefitting equitably from the curriculum.
Calculated based on whether all
students and each
subgroup are meeting or making progress toward their state - set targets for the percentage of
students achieving at grade level
Further, charter schooling may produce improvements in the broader education system by creating an environment where schools must compete for
students; to attract
students, schools must maintain a high level of quality.2 And though results vary among schools, states, and
student subgroups, on average charter schools
achieve positive results relative to traditional public schools, particularly with traditionally underserved
student groups.
Virginia Asian, black, Hispanic and white fourth - grade
students achieved the highest average scores for their respective
subgroups.
In grade 8, black and white
students in the commonwealth
achieved the fourth - highest state averages for their
subgroups, Hispanic
students in Virginia ranked fifth when compared with Hispanic
students in other states, and Asian
students ranked seventh.
NCLB's safe harbor provision, however, uses complementary logic: A
subgroup that does not
achieve its annual performance goal can still «pass» if the percentage of
students scoring below proficient in that
subgroup decreases by 10 percent or more.