Sentences with phrase «student subgroups so»

Not exact matches

Two - year data averaging: using two school years» worth of data on the racial / ethnic subgroup for that grade level, so drawing on two cohorts of students.

So we know that Latinx students, black students and then some subgroups within the Asian American population, are not fairing as well, they are just not completing at the same rate as their white counterparts.»

Instead, schools and students are selected randomly to participate so that enough students take the NAEP test for it to produce usable data for the all students group and for particular subgroups, like Black, Hispanic, and low - income kids.

For the first time, the law required schools to test all children annually in grades 3 through 8 and at least once in high school and report results by subgroups — including race, English learners and students with disabilities — so it was clear how every student was faring.

With waivers so far, if a subgroup of students in a waiver state performed poorly, schools weren't forced to intervene.

So the state has a stake in ensuring that 95 percent of all students and all subgroups are tested beyond simply ensuring the validity of the test results.

All states, both waived and unwaived, must report the number and percentage of students in each subgroup, how many pass the reading / language arts and mathematics tests, the number who graduate high school with a standard diploma, and so on.

While minorities and subgroups showed improvements, so did white students and those not from wealthier backgrounds, so the gaps remained at close to the same levels.

The multicolored chart also includes an «equity report» showing which student subgroups, based on racial and ethnic background, income levels, and so on, are lagging behind.

At every level of aggregation we lose insight into what is actually going on with students, so rather than being valid and actionable, a combined subgroup seems to blur what the data means.

It will also include what Venessa Keesler calls the «crown jewel» of the dashboard: suspension and expulsion data for all students — separated by subgroup — so parents can see if there are any discipline disparities.

Most state web sites do a poor job of comprehensively visualizing multiple years of student data for multiple subgroups so that trends can be easily seen.

One positive aspect that came out of NCLB was that it highlighted achievement gaps among subgroups of students, and ESSA will continue to do so.

Three studies have examined these effects so far and found positive effects on educational attainment for at least one subgroup of students.

NCLB requires states to publish and disaggregate data by subgroups so we know which students are being well served and which ones are not.

The Fifth Indicator must be measurable to the extent that it can be disaggregated by student subgroups, tiered so states can identify differences between high and low performing schools, and linked somehow to student achievement.