Here students will have shared rooms with other
students of the same gender.
Not exact matches
Although I strive to use
gender - inclusive language wherever possible and appropriate, and I ask the
same (with explanation) from my
students, your own extensions
of the basic insight or sentiment are debatable enough, I believe, to summon up my misgivings
of yesteryear.
Because Mona Lisa Smile is Dead Poets Society with women, it's set in an exclusive
same -
gendered school in a sepia Fifties past where lockstep cardboard
student types get a moment in the sun before succumbing to the role
of helpmeet for the bohemian professor, too good for the best and too young to die.
Some
of what I attribute to the 8th grade might have occurred in previous years, if the
student had had multiple years
of schooling from a teacher
of the
same gender.
The overall results — the average for the three subject areas — indicate an average positive impact on
student achievement
of 4 percent
of a standard deviation whenever the teacher -
student gender was the
same (see Figure 3).
Some may therefore find in these results a strong case for a particular form
of single - sex education, where teachers and
students share the
same gender.
The majority
of arguments for single - sex schools and classrooms focus on the effects on interactions among
students, but they also present the possibility
of greatly increasing the number
of students with teachers
of the
same gender.
Still, to double - check this possibility, I isolate those situations where
students of different
genders had the
same teacher.
Because teachers were considering intangible factors, even when race,
gender, family income, and academic achievement are the
same, there was no way to isolate the effect
of being held back, much less to make reasonable conclusions about the effects
of retention on a
student's academic achievement or the probability
of his dropping out
of high school.
To eliminate the effects
of any chance differences in performance caused by other observable characteristics, our analysis takes into account
students» age,
gender, race, and eligibility for the free lunch program; whether they had been assigned to a small class; and whether they were assigned to a teacher
of the
same race — which earlier research using these
same data found to have a large positive effect on
student performance (see «The Race Connection,» Spring 2004).
In addition, we control for determinants
of student achievement that may change over time, such as a teacher's experience level, as well as for
student characteristics, such as prior - year test scores,
gender, racial / ethnic subgroup, special education classification, gifted classification, English proficiency classification, and whether the
student was retained in the
same grade.
«The district created a series
of student focus groups, organized by
gender and cultural background, and we gave all
of them the
same message,» explains Debra Duardo, director
of DPR.
Billy Ball at NC Policy Watch reported earlier this year that one school that qualifies to receive the taxpayer - funded vouchers, Lee Christian in Sanford, requires
students and parents to sign a «lifestyle statement and covenant» agreeing that «
gender confusion» reflects a state
of depravity and that sexual relationships between people
of the
same sex are «sinful and immoral.»
In that
same spirit, we urge you now to consider the voices
of thousands
of educators from across the country who are committed to ending racial and
gender discipline disparities in our schools through evidence - based strategies aimed at addressing the root causes
of student misbehavior.
The technical explanation, in part, is that test designers try to build questions that avoid Differential Item Functioning (DIF)- items in which
students from different groups (commonly
gender or ethnicity) with the
same underlying achievement levels have a different probability
of giving a certain response on that particular item.
Students at Minneapolis College
of Art and Design criticized their Estrogen Bomb poster campaign, describing it as insensitive towards transgender people since it ties the female
gender to estrogen, the
same sort
of essentialist link the Guerilla Girls aim to critique.
The Casebook also includes court decisions from Canada: Haig v. Canada (1992)(omission
of sexual orientation in the Canadian Human Rights Act is discriminatory); Egan v. Canada (1995)(whether exclusion
of same - sex relationships from the definition
of common law spouse violated the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms Section 15 prohibition
of discrimination on the basis
of sexual orientation); Vriend v. Alberta (1998)(college laboratory instructor dismissed because
of his homosexuality); Hall v. Powers (2002)(
student refused permission to attend a prom at a Catholic high school with his boyfriend); Halpern et al. v. Attorney General
of Canada (2003)(whether denial
of marriage licenses to
same - sex couples based on the common law definition
of marriage was discriminatory under the Charter; a postscript indicates that the 2005 Civil Marriage Act provided for
gender - neutral definition
of marriage).