Last school year, 84 percent of Utah
students tested proficient in language arts, up from 82 percent the year before; 69 percent tested proficient in math, the same as in 2011; and 72 percent scored proficient in science, up from 70 percent, according to the State Office of Education.
Yet proficiency lags: Only 60 percent of black and Latino
students tested proficient in eighth - grade algebra.
In the 2013 - 14 school year, about 9 percent of Memorial's black
students tested proficient in math and 13 percent in reading, compared to 46 percent of white students in math and 51 percent in reading.
In LA Unified, 39.55 percent of
students tested proficient in English language arts, a slight increase from 39 percent the year before (LA Unified officials are rounding the increase to 1 percent).
Although Shelby County has one of the lowest percentages of students who are economically disadvantaged in the state, only about half of
its students tested proficient or advanced on state math tests in 2011, according to state numbers.
Across all subjects, 45 percent of
its students tested proficient or advanced, a roughly a 7 percent drop from last year.
Not exact matches
In fact, you may be hearing some chatter this week with the start of the state
testing season, as the New York State United Teachers union calls for fixing the benchmarks used to determine whether or not your
student is
proficient.
While Syracuse School Superintendent Jaime Alicea is encouraged by the modest improvement in
student English and math
test scores, he said ``... there are still far too many
students who are not scoring
proficient on these exams.»
About one - third of children in rural districts and about 37 percent in New York City were considered
proficient in the skills they need in English and math, while just an average of 16 percent of
students in upstate city schools performed well on the
tests.
Syracuse
students»
test scores were also low, with 10.4 percent of
students» scores in third - through eighth - grade being rated «
proficient» versus the state's 39.1 percent average.
Test scores for third through eighth graders were released Wednesday and they show a dramatic drop in the number of New York state
students who are considered
proficient in math and English.
The fact that only about one third of
students are
proficient on state
tests in math and language arts was «simply unacceptable,» the letter said.
The most recent state
testing data showed that the percent of Erie County black
students considered
proficient in English was 31 percentage points lower than their white peers, compared to a 20 - point gap statewide.
In
test results released Friday, 38 % of city
students scored
proficient in English - a jump of nearly eight percentage points from last year that put the city's scores on par with the state overall for the first time.
6,687
students 623 classroom teachers 10 schools (one high school, two junior highs, seven elementary) $ 188.8 million 2010 - 11 budget 1 % of
students need free or reduced price lunches 97 %
students are white or Asian (3 % black or Latino) 83 % of third - graders scored
proficient or higher on this year's state's English
test; 90 % on math exam.
In 2016, only 4 in 10 eight grade public school
students were
proficient in science and 97.9 % of middle school
students who took the Program for International
Student Assessment (PISA)
test, where Puerto Rico ranked 64 out of 70, exhibited low abilities interpreting scientific information and working on complex problems.
Students would transition to regular instruction after
testing proficient in English.
The largest gains for the
test — the Kentucky Instructional Results System, or KIRIS — came in reading and mathematics, with fewer
students scoring at the «novice,» or lowest, level and more
students scoring at the «
proficient» and «distinguished» levels.
Many states need to revamp their policies for including limited - English -
proficient students in state
tests and accountability systems if they want to continue receiving all of their federal Title I aid, according to the Department of Education.
At Summit Prep, 82 percent of
students scored
proficient or above on that
test.
Under the law, schools must show not only that their overall
student body is making «adequate yearly progress» on state
tests, but also that a sufficient percentage of certain subgroups of
students are likewise
proficient.
By 2022, 64.9 percent of
students will be
proficient on PARCC English / language arts
test, and 61.2 percent
proficient on PARCC math
test.
Should the
student meet intermediate targets within the trajectory, he or she will be classified as
proficient within four years in the
tested grades.
As a result, state
tests were made much more challenging and the percentage of
students identified as
proficient dropped from 90 percent or more to around 50 percent, a candid admission of the challenges the Tennessee schools faced.
The measures used in the NEPC report — whether schools make AYP, state accountability system ratings, the percentage of
students that score
proficient on state
tests, and high - school graduation rates — are at best rough proxies for the quality of education provided by any school.
That is, if a state reports that 85 percent of its
students are
proficient readers based on the results of its own
tests, but NAEP only reports that 25 percent of that states
students are
proficient, states would be embarrassed by such a discrepancy.
The original act held schools accountable to minimum percentages of
proficient students, as measured by scores on standardized
tests, with the threat of sanctions, including school closure, if they failed.
States were required to bring all
students to the «
proficient level» on state
tests by the 2013 - 14 school year, although each state got to decide, individually, just what «proficiency» should look like, and which
tests to use.
After all, there isn't a book out there for
students called The Secret that says if you just think «
proficient» hard enough, you'll ace every
test.
But if a school has fewer than 95 percent of
students taking
tests,
students who don't take
tests will be considered «not
proficient.»
The performance levels considered
proficient on NAEP
tests are roughly equivalent to those set by international organizations that estimate
student proficiency worldwide.
The assessment will continue to use performance standards — basic,
proficient, and advanced — and a mix of multiple - choice and open - response
test items in assessing the academic achievement of U.S.
students.
If the percentage of
students identified as
proficient in any given year is essentially the same for both the NAEP exam and for a state's
tests, it may be inferred that the state has established as rigorous a proficiency standard as that set by NAEP.
But if percentages of
students identified as
proficient are higher on a state's own
tests than on NAEP
tests, then it may be concluded that the state has set its proficiency bar lower than the NAEP standard.
In recent years, the percentage of Kettle Moraine
students deemed
proficient or advanced in reading or math has been 5 to 25 points above the state average on Wisconsin's state standardized
tests.
We were also able to examine whether
students who meet designated standards on the
tests («
proficient» on MCAS and «college - ready» on PARCC) are likely to be prepared for college as indicated by their need for remedial coursework and by their ability to earn «C» or «B» grades in college.
Percentage at the
Proficient Level in Math Fall 2014 • Accompanies U.S.
Students from Educated Families Lag in International
Tests It's not just about kids in poor neighborhoods By Eric A. Hanushek, Ludger Woessmann and Paul E. Peterson
While only 17 % of
students from low - education families
tested proficient in math as compared to 43 % of high - education families, when compared to
students of well - educated families in other countries, the U.S. fails miserably.
For each available
test, we computed the difference between the percentage of
students who were
proficient on the NAEP and the percentage reported to be
proficient on the state's own
tests for the same year.
Even if these
students make incredible gains in their sixth -, seventh -, and eighth - grade years, they still won't be at grade level, much less «
proficient,» when they sit for the state
test.
We then linked the grades given to each school to data on the school's characteristics: its size, the size of classes at the school, the racial and ethnic composition of its
students, the percentage of
students from poor families, and the percentage of
students performing at
proficient levels on state reading and math
tests.
Even so, 81 percent of BASIS DC
students were
proficient in reading and 77 percent were
proficient in math on the D.C. standardized
test results released in July 2013, less than a year after the school opened.
As Eric Hanushek, Ludger Woessmann and I show in our book Endangering Prosperity: A Global View of the American School (publication date: September 3, 2013), the United States, with 32 percent of its
students proficient in mathematics, comes in Number 32 among political jurisdictions that take the PISA
test.
Based on its own
tests and standards, the state claimed in 2009 that over 90 percent of its 4th - grade
students were
proficient in math, whereas NAEP
tests revealed that only 28 percent were performing at a
proficient level.
Few people would defend the quality of most state
tests and the low bar that they set to proclaim a
student «
proficient.»
Central High did not make the Adequate Yearly Progress standard under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, and less than 20 percent of its
students score «
proficient» on state standardized math
tests.
The NCLB accountability system divides schools into those in which a sufficient number of
students score at the
proficient level or above on state
tests to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) benchmarks («make AYP») and those that fail to make AYP.
For example, on the 4th - grade math
test in 2009, West Virginia reported that 60.8 percent of its
students had achieved proficiency, but 28.1 percent were
proficient on the NAEP.
The authors use data from state
tests and the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) to estimate changes to each state's proficiency standards in reading and math in grades 4 and 8 by identifying the difference between the percentages of
students the state identifies as
proficient and the percentages of
students identified as
proficient by NAEP, an internationally benchmarked proficiency standard.
Los Altos says that among the 7th graders who used the program in 2010 — 11 — all remedial
students — 41 percent scored «
proficient» or «advanced» on the California Standards
Test compared to 23 percent the year before.