Before they believe anything, they want
studies proving theories.
Not exact matches
That's not the first time I've made such a discovery: It seems that for almost every
study indicating the truth of one
theory, there's another
proving the opposite.
Again this does not deny that it is probably correct but to date it is still a
theory and still being
study to
prove fact.
In the early days of his influence on literary
studies, his
theories proved particularly pernicious, sending scholars scurrying after phallic symbols and psychoanalyzing authors.
A scientist who
studies the galaxy will fight hard to
prove his
theory is correct, but the moment there is evidence to show otherwise, they adjust their original
theory.
The
theory of personal and official charisma will
prove very fruitful; it has recently, been applied to the
study of primitive society, Indo - European and Hebrew religion, and medieval Christianity.
@Robert Must be the same cabal that's got all those thousands of scientists from various fields of
study falsfiying the results of tens of thousands of experiments that
prove the validity of the
Theory of Evolution.
Its an unprovable concept, and therefore it should not be taught in science classes, which aim to
study those things that have been
proven by scientific
theory.
BRC, there is no evidence?!?! what an uneducated statement, there are hundreds / thousands of books and
studies, research by thousands of scientists, some christians some not... evolution is REAL... it's a
proven theory and i would put that against your ONE book that was written when everyone thought the earth was flat.
The not - so - late Doctor Reginald Stockhausen
proved the
theories of the esteemed Dr. Eric M.D. Berne to be base on a small sampling and inherently flawed due to a comprised control
study.
Go and actually read some of the
studies that Kellymom and Dr. Sears are claiming
prove their
theory and you will find that those
studies have nothing to do with sleep training.
Hawking was
studying the work of Roger Penrose, which
proved that if Einstein's general
theory of relativity is correct, at the heart of every black hole must be a point where space and time themselves break down — a singularity.
Although such an observational
study can not
prove that the waning of the acellular vaccine and discontinuation of the whole vaccine caused the recent pertussis outbreaks, the findings adds more to the
theory.
A
study carried out by environmental scientists from the University of Basel has now shown that although the research community considers this to be a
proven theory, no
studies have been published to confirm it.
The results of this
study counter the rational choice models that are currently used in sexual selection
theory, suggesting they may
prove inadequate to explain decisions in socially complex and dynamic mating arenas.
Thermodynamics, the physical
theory that resulted from the
study of these machines,
proved to be an extremely fruitful approach; it is still a central concept in the optimisation of energy use in heat engines.
To
prove this
theory, the Drs. Mellanby did a
study on children with existing cavities and reported their findings in the British Medical Journal.
However, these are just
theories, and it's important to note that this
study only found an association between soda consumption and thinking deficits in children, and could not
prove a cause - and - effect link.
You may be surprised to learn that this
theory, known as the «Diet - Heart Hypothesis», has never actually been
proven despite numerous
studies.
Although there are no clinical
studies proving its efficacy, Dr. Matthew Brennecke, a board certified naturopathic doctor practicing at the Rocky Mountain Wellness Center in Fort Collins, Colo., told Medical Daily in an email, «A common
theory is that honey acts like a natural vaccine.»
It also makes me think of how the calorie
theory has been
proven by similar kinds of
studies in which diet is totally controlled.
For all the
theories of imperfection about the United Nations I had
studied (and even witnessed during an internship with the General Assembly in NYC), my experience in Burundi
proved to be most valuable.
Universities and research centers regularly conduct
studies to
prove a
theory, and they often pay subjects that participate in these
studies.
As demonstrated by the
studies and
theory behind David Kolb's experiential learning cycle, learning through experience has been
proven scientifically to very likely be the best way to learn.
While there hasn't been any
proven theory or
study to explain the behaviour, a video by DNnews discussed various
theories.
Both
theories are, of course, nonsense, as a
study of labrador genetics
proves.
This is not a newfangled idea but rather a scientifically
proven theory that has been extensively researched,
studied, and known about since the 1930's.
While
studies have yet to
prove this, my
theory as an exotic animal veterinarian who has worked with autistic children owning exotic pets is that very active dogs or fast - moving cats may be overwhelming to children resistant to touch; smaller, calmer exotic pets, such as guinea pigs and slow - moving reptiles (turtles, tortoises, snakes and some lizards) may be less overwhelming to these children.
Economics might be the
study of past bad decisions that caused financial harm, the inefficient use of resources and explanations of how this or that
theory is about to finally
prove itself as a reliable enduring truth.
Just in terms of balance, there would seem to be a need for
studies on those psychologists, sociologists, warmists etc. who base their analysis of denial on the assumption that CO2
theory is
proven, and hence is undeniable.
A few groups pursued the
study of possible mechanisms, for example elaborating
theories of how changes in the atmosphere's electric circuit, which varies with the flux of cosmic rays, affected precipitation in the Arctic, Ram et al. (2009), or devising experiments that they hoped would show a direct and strong effect of cosmic rays on clouds, e.g., Svensmark et al. (2007)(which brought a strong press reaction but
proved little).
While there are currently no
studies that have
proven a direct correlation between parents distracted by mobile devices and the increase in child injuries, many doctors and public safety experts believe that statistics back this
theory up.
My
theory has not been tested or
proven through scientific
study.
In addition to the many other reasons to strive for effective legal writing, these results provide empirical, not just anecdotal, support for the
theory that more readable writing can make a difference, although of course our
study does not
prove a causal relationship.
You don't have to be a mother to love these results — scientific
theory, matched with rigorous,
studies,
proving that home visiting works.