The need for technology integration within social
studies teacher preparation and education programs has also lagged behind expectations (Mehlinger & Powers, 2002).
He studies teacher preparation and professional development through engagement in program and course design, teaching mathematics methods courses, and leading projects funded by NSF and IES focused on the design of professional development materials and the assessment of teaching practice.
With the benefit of significant research on this topic (much of it by the authors of these guidelines) and sobered, like them, by the «hype cycles and the techno - romance of emerging technologies» (Hicks et al., 2014, para. 5), social studies scholars today have a better informed and more theoretically sophisticated perspective concerning the affordances and challenges of digital technologies in social
studies teacher preparation than once was the case.
In 2000, we offered the following five principles as «guides for the appropriate infusion of technology in social
studies teacher preparation programs» (para. 2) We have now reduced these five principles to four with updated language and focus.
We offer the following five principles as guides for the appropriate infusion of technology in social
studies teacher preparation programs.
The need to leverage theory in the development of guidelines for using technology in social
studies teacher preparation: A reply to Crocco and Mason et al..
Committee recommendation: Inexpedient to legislate (19 - 0) HB 1636, establishing a committee to
study teacher preparation and education programs.
Not exact matches
Lori has
studied several times with the Iyengar family at RIMYI (Iyengar Institute) in Pune, India and continues to participate in the
teacher training program at Yoga Centre Toronto in
preparation for her next level of certification.
Halvorsen's work focuses on elementary social
studies education, particularly for children from low socio - economic backgrounds, the history of education,
teacher preparation in the social
studies, and the integration of social
studies and literacy.
Released in 2010, the United States
Teacher Education Study in Mathematics, or TEDS - M, examined teacher preparation in 16 cou
Teacher Education
Study in Mathematics, or TEDS - M, examined
teacher preparation in 16 cou
teacher preparation in 16 countries.
NCTQ then defends its
study's ability to identify
teacher preparation effectiveness by making two points:
Teachers are encouraged or required to suspend or interrupt science, social
studies, and other core subjects not tested by TAAS for TAAS
preparation in other disciplines.
Studies suggest that
teachers with bachelor's degrees and specialized training in early education are more effective than those educators who don't hold such credentials, says a report on early - childhood education and
teacher preparation.
Just as professionals in medicine, architecture, and law have opportunities to learn through examining case
studies, learning best practices, and participating in internships, exemplary
teacher -
preparation programs allow
teacher candidates the time to apply their learning of theory in the context of teaching in a real classroom.»
Elementary - school
teachers who are covered by collective - bargaining agreements spend less time instructing students in the classroom than do their peers who are not covered by contracts, but they devote more time to classroom
preparation and administrative tasks, a new
study by two University of Oregon researchers has found.
Third, I
study how
teacher preparation programs can provide support and opportunities for beginning
teachers to learn from practice.
Meanwhile, our
study focused elsewhere, on the quality of
teacher preparation.
I envision the first steps in this process to be a broad and inclusive conversation that brings the public, private, and not - for - profit sectors together to forge a concrete plan for
studying and strengthening
teacher preparation.
For instance, Ashton and Crocker (1987) cite numerous
studies on
teacher preparation to support their conclusion that coursework in education makes
teachers more effective than coursework in their subject matter does.
This sampling strategy was designed to avoid the criticisms that have been made of a similar
study of
teacher -
preparation syllabi conducted by David Steiner (see «Skewed Perspective,» Education Next, Winter 2005).
Indeed, the great variation within this growing niche of the
teacher preparation world makes it all but impossible to
study.
Beyond the recent
Teachers College
study, which did not seek to systematically explore the content of instruction, that question has remained unaddressed since researchers last conducted reviews of what was taught in University Council for Educational Administration
preparation programs, in 1987 and 1992.
For instance, from an NCATE newsletter published in 1999: «Over 100
studies show that qualified
teachers outperform those with little or no
preparation in helping students learn.»
State regulations that promote a one - size - fits - all approach to
teacher preparation have limited our ability to innovate, customize, and
study features of
preparation programs that may positively affect student achievement.
Denton and Lacina's 1984
study is cited repeatedly by advocates of certification because it was supposed to have found a positive relationship between formal
teacher preparation and student achievement (Evertson, Hawley, and Zlotnik 1985; Darling - Hammond 1999).
The actual number of longitudinal or quasi-longitudinal
studies that controlled for students» backgrounds and used student achievement as the measure of whether
teacher preparation made a difference was far fewer.
Charged by the U.S. Department of Education with combing the existing research on
teacher preparation and subjecting it to scientific standards used in other fields, scholars with the Center for the
Study of Teaching and Policy at the University of Washington (Wilson, Floden, and Ferrini - Mundy 2001) eliminated all but 57
studies written in the past 20 years.
In my home state of Texas, for example, the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) requires that in addition to the content standards specified for each grade band, the curriculum for
teacher preparation programs must include 17 specific subjects of
study.
Perhaps the most widely discussed critique of
teacher preparation of the past decade, the hotly debated 2006
study by the National Center for Policy Analysis, Educating School
Teachers, simply presumed that
teacher recruitment ought to be geared toward new college graduates who would complete beefed - up versions of familiar training programs before being cleared to enter the same old jobs.
During Keppel's fourteen year administration, the Graduate School of Education gained a strong national reputation as a leading institution for
teacher preparation, advanced
study, and research in education.
A
study shows how
teachers built their in - class technology integration around five conceptions: theory, creativity, public learning, life
preparation, and contextual accommodations.
«While we acknowledge that some
studies of
teacher preparation programs find very small differences at the program level... we believe that the examples we have cited above provide a reasonable basis for States» use of student learning outcomes» to evaluate
teacher -
preparation programs.
Lisa P. Kuh is an assistant professor in the Family
Studies Department at the University of New Hampshire, the consultant for Pedagogy and Inquiry at the UNH Child
Study and Development Center, and coordinator of the undergraduate early childhood
teacher preparation program.
the
preparation of mentors, which may include but shall not be limited to the
study of the theory of adult learning, the theory of
teacher development, the elements of a mentoring relationship, peer coaching techniques, and time management methodology;
The
study of
teacher preparation models by Constantine et al., showing that students with an alternatively certified
teacher did no worse on achievement tests than students whose
teacher came through the traditional route, shed light on the effectiveness of different
teacher training strategies.
The
study, by the National Council on
Teacher Quality, which has long promoted overhauling U.S. teacher preparation, assigned ratings of up to four stars to 1,200 programs at 608 institutions that collectively account for 72 % of the graduates of all
Teacher Quality, which has long promoted overhauling U.S.
teacher preparation, assigned ratings of up to four stars to 1,200 programs at 608 institutions that collectively account for 72 % of the graduates of all
teacher preparation, assigned ratings of up to four stars to 1,200 programs at 608 institutions that collectively account for 72 % of the graduates of all such...
Studies of the relative merits of various certification policies and programs are clearly important to the continuing policy debates concerning
teacher preparation and
teacher quality, but they ask questions that are fundamentally different from those of the
study described here.
Investing in high - quality
teacher -
preparation programs for reading
teachers could lead to higher student achievement in the subject, concludes the final report of a commission that has
studied the issue over the past three years.
First, this
study was not designed to test the benefits of the various
teacher -
preparation programs or of certification.
Studies with more detailed measures of
teachers» education levels and coursework in subject areas found that, at least in math and science, academic
preparation does positively influence student achievement.
Stakeholders should consider
studying how
teacher preparation programs alter their recruitment and
preparation efforts in light of these data.47
In a review of the published empirical literature, eight research
studies were identified that included findings related to the structure of a
teacher leader
preparation program.
In this set of eight
studies, Lalli and Feger (2005) was the sole example of a
study designed to compare the effects of systematically varied structures in
teacher leader
preparation programs.
In general,
studies indicated that high - stakes standardized basic skills tests led to: a) a narrowing of the curriculum, b) an overemphasis on basic skills and test - like instructional methods, c) a reduction in effective instructional time and an increase in time for test
preparation, d) inflated test scores, and e) pressure on
teachers to improve test scores (Herman & Golan, 1993; Nolen, Haladyna, & Haas, 1992; Resnick & Resnick, 1992; Shepard, 1991; Shepard & Dougherty, 1991, Smith, 1991; Smith, Edelsky, Draper, Rottenberg, & Cherland, 1990).
Previously she was Co-Director of SRI International's Center for Education Policy where she led research
studies on the
preparation and induction of new
teachers,
teacher professional development and
teacher leadership, and systems reform efforts.
While most of these
studies shared common methodological limitations, two
studies (Khourey - Bowers et al., 2006; Lalli & Feger, 2005) described a robust empirical design for research on structuring the
preparation of
teacher leaders that may serve as examples for the design of future
studies.
Findings from these
studies indicated that what
teacher leaders learned in a
preparation program was replicated in their practice with
teachers.
(Click on the name of each
study to read a description of the intervention involving structuring
teacher leaders»
preparation.)
These
studies reported on
preparation programs that provided the opportunity to participants to perform as leaders, whether in a role - play in front of other program participants (Nesbit et al., 2001), while working with classroom
teachers in an actual
teacher leadership position in a school or district (Howe & Stubbs, 2003), or with the support of a mentor in a
teacher leader training program (Harris & Townsend, 2007).
The theme of hands - on activities contributing to the development of
teacher leader knowledge was found in
studies in mathematics and science and all grade levels, indicating that this was considered an appropriate strategy for a
teacher leader
preparation programs regardless of the subject area or grade focus.