Sentences with phrase «study authors reviewed»

To examine this condition's connection to alcohol consumption, the study authors reviewed data collected from 82,737 women via the Nurses» Health Study II.

Not exact matches

Then, a few weeks ago, author and academic Sherry Turkle penned a New York Times Sunday Review piece highlighting research along the same lines, including one study that showed simply having your phone out and in view can impede the process of making deep personal connections.

The authors are submitting the paper, which builds on previous studies testing artificial intelligence, for further review at an upcoming AI conference.

Here's how one of the study authors explained the study procedure in The Harvard Business Review:

Explaining their findings in Harvard Business Review, the study's authors, Harvard's Robert Huckman and Bradley Staats of the University of North Carolina, pointed to the time it takes new team members to learn how to communicate with one another and determine who is the best authority in different areas.

The author of Eat Stop Eat — Brad Pilon — has studied over 317 peer reviewed scientific research papers.

Religion Can Make You Poor In her review of Lisa A. Keister's Faith and Money: How Religion Contributes to Wealth and Poverty (February), Naomi Schaefer Riley takes the author to task for the superficiality of her analysis of her study's findings regarding religion's effect on socioeconomic status.

First, a study published in 2016 showed that during «2013 and 2014, only 4 of 69,406 authors of peer - reviewed articles on global warming, 0.0058 percent or 1 in 17,352, rejected» anthropogenic global warming.

Again start with the studies of Professors Crossan and Ludemann followed by the epic NT review by the RCC approved tome by Professor Father Raymond Brown (878 pages) where he reviews the authors of all the NT documents, gospels and epistles.

These grand claims and promises are, alas, not met and thus are clearly overstated given that the authors find such meager evidence of health benefits of religion in the more than 1,200 studies and 400 research reviews they examine.

The authors» responsibilities were as follows — CNM: had leadership responsibility for the research planning and execution, wrote the manuscript, and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; CNM, HE, and BN: formulated the study idea and designed the research; EV and JM: managed the day - to - day conduct of the study and oversaw the data collection; YJ: performed statistical analyses of the study data; and all authors: provided critical review and commentary on the draft of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

The author of Eat Stop Eat — Brad Pilon — has studied over 317 peer reviewed scientific research papers.

In an ideal world, systematic reviews provide access to all the available evidence on specific exposure — disease associations, but publication bias related to authors» conflicts of interest may affect the reliability of the conclusions of such studies.

In fact, the authors do not discuss the reliability or validity of any study included in the review (Wax et al, 2010), or why any particular study was excluded and this is potentially the primary issue with the Wax study.

Another, potentially important factor to consider, is that authors did not identify the training level of the midwife in attendance within each study reviewed.

The authors said that to their knowledge, this is the first peer - reviewed study to quantify diaper need.

By the way, a great book by another skeptical OBGYN is called «Born in the USA» only he's skeptical of medicalized birth because he's a clinical scientist as well, unlike our author here and he's realized that home birth is safer than hospital birth according to peer - reviewed large scale studies.

Avent bottles reviews show that the best authors of clinical studies are parents who use these products for their little ones day and night for weeks or months.

Dr. Katherine Tamminen, assistant professor at the University of Toronto and associate editor of the International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, was the lead author of a study on helping adolescent athletes cope with stress.

Personally, I find it rather ironic that you're lecturing the blog author on the rigor of language, when, faced with the need to support the claims made by a documentary that has faced absolutely no real standards of intellectual rigor or merit (the kind of evidence you apparently find convincing), you have so far managed to produce a study with a sample size too small to conclude anything, a review paper that basically summarized well known connections between vaginal and amniotic flora and poor outcomes in labor and birth before attempting to rescue what would have been just another OB review article with a few attention grabbing sentences about long term health implications, and a review article published in a trash journal.

The 2 review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data, and contacted study authors for additional information.

In a review of all 18 studies, the authors found breastfeeding for six months or longer was associated with a 19 percent lower risk compared with no breastfeeding or breastfeeding for a shorter period of time.

Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all the potential studies identified as a result of the search strategy.

For eligible studies, two review authors extracted the data using the agreed form.

Two review authors (H Whitford and T Dowswell) independently assessed for inclusion all the potential studies we identified as a result of the search strategy.

But no peer - reviewed published studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of these plans, and none were developed by doctors or scientists, so parents either have to trust the authors or hope that what worked for their friends will work for their kids, too.

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

In addition, one review author (T Dowswell) checked excluded studies from «Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies» (McFadden 2017) for any studies that included sick or preterm infants and which might have included multiples, and we checked reference lists of retrieved studies (H Whitford, T Dowswell and S Wallis).

Two review authors (H Whitford, T Dowswell, H West, or S Wallis) independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

Studies had to be case control for the purpose of the statistical analysis; have breastfeeding as a measured exposure and leukemia as a measured outcome; include data on breastfeeding duration in months, including but not limited to, 6 months or more (where relevant data were unavailable in the publication, the authors of the studies were contacted); and been published in peer - reviewed journals with full text available in EStudies had to be case control for the purpose of the statistical analysis; have breastfeeding as a measured exposure and leukemia as a measured outcome; include data on breastfeeding duration in months, including but not limited to, 6 months or more (where relevant data were unavailable in the publication, the authors of the studies were contacted); and been published in peer - reviewed journals with full text available in Estudies were contacted); and been published in peer - reviewed journals with full text available in English.

In the review published by Guise et al32 in 2005, the authors classified only 2 of the 10 studies as being of good quality.

But the Reviews have sunk to a new low with the publication of this homebirth «study» that is nothing more than the personal opinions of the partisan authors.

But the observational studies (comparing like with like in both settings) have increasingly strong evidence and the authors are recommending adding that in a review of PHB.

Risk of bias graph: review authors» judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

The authors conducted a systematic review of published studies from which estimates of a mean difference (standard error) in blood pressure between breastfed and bottle - fed subjects could be derived.

In order to minimise the bias in the review process, two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion and any disagreements were resolved by a third review author.

We have therefore updated our review in an attempt to address these issues, using, insofar as possible, data provided by the authors of individual studies, to establish with greater precision the strength of the relation between infant feeding and blood cholesterol.

For eligible studies, two review authors extracted information using the agreed form.

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (the Handbook)(Higgins 2011).

Since 2006, she has co-ordinated the review process, written to authors for additional information, managed data for the review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspereview process, written to authors for additional information, managed data for the review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspereview, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspeReview Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspective.

Two review authors independently assessed all the potential studies identified as a result of the search strategy for inclusion.

Seven additional references with relevant data were also included: 3 studies were identified by an ongoing OVID alert system for a related review (9, 14, 15), 2 were cited from reference lists of eligible studies (16, 17), 1 article was written by 2 of the authors (RMM and GDS)(18), and 1 meeting abstract was also identified (19).

Clinical Psychologist (USA) Dr Brooke Magnanti Feona Attwood, Professor of Media & Communication at Middlesex University Martin Barker, Emeritus Professor at University of Aberystwyth Jessica Ringrose, Professor, Sociology of Gender and Education, UCL Institute of Education Ronete Cohen MA, Psychologist Dr Meg John Barker, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, The Open University Kath Albury, Associate Professor, UNSW Australia Myles Jackman, specialist in obscenity law Dr Helen Hester, Middlesex University Justin Hancock, youth worker and sex educator Ian Dunt, Editor in Chief, Politics.co.uk Ally Fogg, Journalist Dr Emily Cooper, Northumbria University Gareth May, Journalist Dr Kate Egan, Lecturer in Film Studies, Aberystwyth University Dr Ann Luce, Senior Lecturer in Journalism and Communication, Bournemouth University John Mercer, Reader in Gender and Sexuality, Birmingham City University Dr. William Proctor, Lecturer in Media, Culture and Communication, Bournemouth University Dr Jude Roberts, Teaching Fellow, University of Surrey Dr Debra Ferreday, Senior Lecturer in Sociology, Lancaster University Jane Fae, author of «Taming the beast» a review of law / regulation governing online pornography Michael Marshall, Vice President, Merseyside Skeptics Society Martin Robbins, Journalist Assoc. Prof. Paul J. Maginn (University of Western Australia) Dr Lucy Neville, Lecturer in Criminology, Middlesex University Alix Fox, Journalist and Sex Educator Dr Mark McCormack, Senior Lecturer in Sociology, Durham University Chris Ashford, Professor of Law and Society, Northumbria University Diane Duke, CEO Free Speech Coalition (USA) Dr Steve Jones, Senior Lecturer in Media, Northumbria University Dr Johnny Walker, Lecturer in Media, Northumbria University

The Institute, which publishes the right - wing Claremont Review of Books, was founded in 1979 by students of Harry Jaffa, a philosophy professor who studied under neocon patriarch Leo Strauss and the author of Barry Goldwater's famous call for «extremism in defense of liberty.»

The authors provide a comprehensive review of all forty identified scientific studies of the effects of psychological therapies for survivors of torture and trauma (e.g., refugees from ethnic violence).

Martínez is the lead author of a study that reviews these problems and proposes a series of recommendations for developers to improve the handling of information that should be confidential.

In an accompanying editorial, Elliott Bennett - Guerrero, M.D., of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, N.C., comments on the results of the systematic review performed by the authors of this study.

Moreover, as the authors of the study report in the peer - reviewed journal Nutrients, one in four older adults has suboptimal vitamin B12 levels.

The review's authors note that most available studies are biased by several drawbacks; however, probiotics, synbiotics, psyllium, and some herbal medicinal products (primarily peppermint oil) seem to be effective in ameliorating IBS symptoms.

Yin is the corresponding author of a study published in the peer - reviewed academic journal Nature Communications, which shows those interactions depend on a pair of genes known as BES1 and RD26.