Antivaxxers distrust big pharma and think that money corrupts medicine, which leads them to believe that vaccines cause autism despite the inconvenient truth that the one and only
study claiming such a link was retracted and its lead author accused of fraud.
Not exact matches
Heidi Shey, a senior analyst at Forrester who
studies the cyber insurance space, says insurers are in an excited «land - grab» state, gobbling up as many customers as they can because insurers believe most businesses will not file a
claim, or there could be a cyber event that doesn't get covered due to an exemption,
such as human error, credit card fraud, or email fraud.
In fact, just 9 percent of students
studying business
claim they received
such support, which is half the rate of kids who took up the arts and humanities.
Concerns have been raised that foreign investment is a key factor behind skyrocketing home prices, but data to
study such claims are lacking because foreign purchases of real estate have not been officially tracked.
I read an interesting article today written by a quantum mechanic
claiming that the new direction in
such scientific
studies is that we can't be sure there is an objective reality but can only hope so, because what we perceive as reality is shaped by the observer.
If Ehrman is right, it would seem that historical
studies could never support the validity of miracle
claims such as the resurrection.
Unfortunately, there are examples of at least one
study, which
claims 97 percent of climate scientists agree global warming is happening and is manmade, which may have done a not - so - great job of reaching
such a conclusion.
His early research on medieval Bulgaria was innovative and original, while his Byzantine
studies, often
claimed as pioneering, followed paths mapped by French scholars
such as Charles Diehl (1859 — 1944) and Louis Bréhier (1868 — 1951) a generation earlier.
In this second conclusion, Schweitzer boldly demands a moratorium on all further efforts to achieve a scholarly, historical reconstruction of the life of Jesus; He
claims that his research has proved the futility of all
such attempts, and in any case,
such studies are not what the modern world or Christianity needs.
Because the
claims of Darwinism are presented to the public as «science,» most people are under the impression that they are supported by direct evidence
such as experiments and fossil record
studies.
One may certainly refrain from insisting, as some Jewish leaders have, upon mandated Holocaust
studies in the public school curriculum: for many people,
such «mandates» might appear as an effort to establish the passion of the Jews as the larger culture's defining story, thus, ironically, giving plausibility to anti-Semitic
claims about Jewish power.
This
claim was
studied and analyzed carefully in http://Rasoulallah.net The answer to
such claim is divided into two parts: Logical answer and scientific answer.
In light of
such claims, it is perhaps not surprising to encounter these
study questions on the scrolls: «Describe the impact of this discovery on those who do not accept the authenticity of the Bible» and «Determine the evidence from the Dead Sea scrolls confirming the
claims of Jesus as the Bible describes him.»
That is, the data used in the
study suspiciously match another data set entirely; the prestigious gay - rights research institute at the grad student's university says it did not fund any survey effort as he
claimed it did; the student admits to having no
such funding and to not having paid survey respondents as he
claimed; the private firm allegedly employed to collect survey data says it has never heard of him or his
study.
I have
studied him extensively and have never heard him make
such a
claim.
This
claim is frequently presented, whether implicitly or explicitly, as a correlative to the idea that Christianity often as personified by Jesus or less frequently by Paul - was «goad» for women, paid them particular attention, or at least offered them opportunities not otherwise available, to caricature, the ideal of «the Feminist Jesus».60 In an admirable and scholarly article Leonard Swidler has marshaled historical evidences to show convincingly that Jesus was a Feminist.61 The politics of
such a view is self - evident, for much
study of the subject has developed within a context where women were struggling to establish a proper role for themselves within the contemporary church; to this end they have sought an egalitarian past to act as model for present polity.62
In Lamech's
claim to the right of revenge «seventy and sevenfold,» (Genesis 4:23 - 24) we have the historic starting point for a
study of the growing ideal of forgiveness, and the first step up from
such unrestricted vengeance was the adoption of retaliation as a substitute.
Whatever the second
study turns up, it is unlikely to
claim that
such abuse was not related to homosexuality.
Trust me, I wouldn't be making
such claims if I hadn't invested much time into this
study.
These grand
claims and promises are, alas, not met and thus are clearly overstated given that the authors find
such meager evidence of health benefits of religion in the more than 1,200
studies and 400 research reviews they examine.
Petaluma, Calif., December 11, 2017 — A new
study from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) examines the flaws in single - trait label
claims, noting that no single label meets the comprehensive requirements of the organic label, while lack of clarity around labels
such as «natural» and «transitional» cause consumers further confusion.
The present
study aimed to measure the prevalence of different types of health and nutrition
claims on foods and non-alcoholic beverages in a UK sample and to assess the nutritional quality of
such products carrying health or nutrition
claims.
The Huffington Post recently
claimed that early administration of epidurals may delay labor or make a C - section more likely to rest, citing a research review of nine
studies that showed no
such support.
Basically, they feel there is not enough solid evidence to accurately conduct a
study and make
such claims.
Several weeks ago, the agency issued draft guidance on structure / function
claims for infant formula, suggesting that in order to be substantiated,
such claims require «competent and reliable evidence,» preferably from randomized, double blind
studies — a rigorous scientific standard.
So you're saying any
studies that show formula yields better results (not that Tanya was making
such claims) would be due to the impossibility of developing a fair sampling / testing method, but you have no problem extolling the virtues of breast feeding, not to mention perpetuating this modern day phrenology of head circumference as a determination of future IQ, based on the same flawed science?
A recent Nestle ad
claims hypoallergenic formula is «clinically proven» to reduce the risk of milk allergies, despite an independent
study in 2011 that showed no
such benefit.
Among these «
studies»
claiming that cry - it - out is harmful for babies is the idea that «crying - it - out is stressful for babies, flooding their sweet little brains with hormones
such as cortisol that interfere with healthy brain development.»
In fact, one
study that
claimed to have found negative consequences of bed - sharing,
such as children internalizing problems with prolonged bed - sharing, had a small sample size and limited information on why the children were sharing a bed with their mom according to Redbook.
A more recent
study of crib injuries that used data from the CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System concluded that the potential benefits of preventing minor injury with bumper pad use were far outweighed by the risk of serious injury
such as suffocation or strangulation.197 In addition, most bumper pads obscure infant and parent visibility, which might increase parental anxiety.195 There are other products that attach to crib sides or crib slats that
claim to protect infants from injury.
In the
study, published online June 3, 2014 in the journal Nutrition, Keck School of Medicine researchers analyzed the chemical composition of 34 popular beverages, finding that beverages and juices made with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS),
such as Coca - Cola, Pepsi, Dr Pepper, Mountain Dew and Sprite, all contain 50 percent more fructose than glucose, a blend that calls into question
claims that sugar and HFCS are essentially the same.
Such claims have linked the rise in occurrence of corn diseases like Goss's wilt, which causes leaf blight and systemic wilt, to the adoption of transgenic corn across the U.S.. However, a new
study from the USDA - Agricultural Research Service (ARS) provides empirical evidence showing no increase in disease susceptibility in transgenic sweet corn treated with glyphosate.
After an analysis of potential workers» compensation
claims in sedentary environments across several states, Drexel University's Natalie Pedersen, JD, an assistant professor of legal
studies in the LeBow College of Business, and Lisa Eisenberg, JD, a graduate of the Thomas R. Kline School of Law and current judicial clerk,
claim employers should be held accountable because it will force them to reduce
such harms in their work environments.
Such claims could lead to confusion for consumers as early clinical and epidemiological
studies report conflicting or confusing results.
Michael Teitelbaum of the Sloan Foundation, which funded the
study, adds that
claims of shortage are «often issued by parties of interest»
such as employer associations.
This is to encourage further
studies of
such objects rather than to make a strong
claim.»
A scientific panel appointed by NASA disagreed with those
claims this summer, but called for the agency to undertake a
study on the ethical issues raised by
such missions (Science, 12 July, p. 175).
«We often hear people
claim that a big snowstorm is evidence that the climate is not warming, but these results make it clear that
such storms do not provide much evidence about a changing climate,» says Broccoli, who did not contribute to the
study.
As it turns out, a slew of more rigorous
studies have found no scientific basis for
such claims.
Such claims prompted a slew of
studies finding no evidence that MMR causes autism.
«The
study did not investigate «microbe - mediated therapies» in humans and the
claim that
such treatments «may be safe and effective» is simply appended as a
claim not only to clinical relevance, but to therapeutic benefit, before even the most preliminary of trials.»
As a result of this
study, HD 284149 ABb therefore becomes the latest addition to the (short) list of brown dwarfs on wide circumbinary orbits, providing new evidence to support recent
claims that object in
such configuration occur with a similar frequency to wide companions to single stars.
Based on previous
studies, we can safely
claim that lifting speed affects important factors that promote hypertrophy and strength development
such as muscle damage, time under tension and metabolic stress.
At one point, for example, it was even thought that digital music players,
such as iPods, could interfere with pacemakers; later
studies — including one by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — later refuted that
claim.
We know that the lemony aura of limonene is more than just a scent, as it can be found in our blood after exposure.8 Furthermore, several anticancer cellular pathways appear to be affected by the terpene limonene, leading some to suggest it has anticancer, or chemopreventative, benefits.9 While feeding it to rats in
studies has revealed some efficacy against breast tumors, 10 we have a ways to go before we can make
such bold
claims in humans.
As for Colin Campbell's China
Study, often cited as proof that plant - based diets are healthier than those containing animal foods, the data on consumption and disease patterns collected by the Cornell University researchers in their massive dietary survey do not support
such claims.
But clinical
studies have not been sufficient to form the basis for
such claims.
These organizations state that larger, more intensive
studies must be made before
such claims of large - scale benefits are considered gospel.
While the authors should know better than to make
such claims, it's very clear that the science - naive journalists who report on these
studies have never learned that association does not equal causation.
However, while these
studies may show that limonoids in foods
such as grapefruit may offer some protection from cancer, these were test tube
studies and clinical
studies need to be conducted before
claims can be made.