Sentences with phrase «study comes to the same conclusion»

Pretty much everyone who studied it came to the same conclusion: The framework was biased.

Study after study comes to the same conclusion.

«A number of studies all come to the same conclusion,» Dr. Mann said.

Not exact matches

Popular Stanford University psychologist Carol Dweck, author of Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, came to the same conclusion in her studies on motivation.

Both studies came to the same basic conclusion: that the risks and uncertainties involved in budget forecasting were simply too large to allow for a high level of forecast accuracy.

Totally separate from them, the Spirit led be to begin really studying what the Bible states about the church, and I came to mostly the same conclusions they had.

I'll take the studies done by scientists that all come to the same basic conclusion over your god any day.

(Around the same time in America, psychologist Harry Harlow was coming to the same conclusion in his fascinating and heart - rending studies of baby monkeys, where he observed that babies sought comfort, and not just food, from their mothers.)

I.e., pretend that you've written it starting off, «Dear Amy»... I wasn't citing any papers because I simply assumed that you and your followers, before coming to such definitive conclusions, would have already come across the same studies that I have.

The National Audit Office, another body set up for the express purpose of being listened to in order prevent costly mistakes, has now come to the same conclusions as everyone else bothered enough to study the evidence.

The study uses four statistical approaches, which come to the same conclusion: «there is no significant correlation between dissolved methane concentrations in groundwater and proximity to nearby oil / gas wells.»

A study commissioned by Onondaga County came to the same conclusion in April.

The Ministry of Defence has carried out a study of the shift in society and came to the same conclusion: The Guardian reported sources saying that public opinion had swayed MPs:

Kelso and her colleagues came to the same conclusion, but they didn't set out to study the immune system.

To come to this conclusion, Berent's lab studied words (and signs) that shared the same general structurTo come to this conclusion, Berent's lab studied words (and signs) that shared the same general structurto this conclusion, Berent's lab studied words (and signs) that shared the same general structure.

«As far as flashbulbs are concerned, we came to the same conclusion as the National Gallery, which recently studied the effect on paintings,» says Howell (This Week, 25 March).

Subsequent studies in 1926 and 1961 came to the same conclusion.

A similar study in PNAS by Emory University researchers came to the same conclusion.

Principe, who had studied the alchemical work of all three men, came to the same conclusion as Newman and decided that he, too, had to replicate the long - abandoned alchemical experiments firsthand.

A number of major studies looking at paleoclimate data come to the same conclusion.

Plus, past studies looking at this same question have come to inconsistent conclusions, explained Kingwell, who wrote an editorial published with the study.

Another study reported by Precision Nutrition also came to the same conclusion that cardio leads to more weight loss.

Extensive research from prior studies has come to the same conclusion.

Apart from this study, more than 130 other studies too came up to the same conclusion.

Over the last few years both the US and EU authorities have listened to public concerns and examined the studies, and both came to the same conclusion: BPA is perfectly safe in low doses.

The quick review of studies dating back to 1981 pretty much came to the same conclusion as Elle Woods, «Regular exercise can improve mood in people with mild to moderate depression.

People please, if you read the China Study or any similar work you would come to the same conclusion: any animal products are bad for us as humans.

While the scientists behind the Nature study may not know it, Dr. Lee and Dr. Zava came to the same conclusions about natural progesterone and breast cancer 13 years ago.

In both males and females with androgenic alopecia, scientists came to same the conclusion (and also found lower HDL - C values compared to control)(2) In acne patients some scientist found the same thing (3) Another study was made to determine the mitochondria in acne suffers, and found that compared to control acne suffers experienced overactive mtorc1 from bad food.

There are other studies lurking out there that come to the exact same conclusion.

Everyone who seriously studies nutrition and its connection to health comes to the same conclusion: The modern diet is killing us and we'd do better to get back to the diet we all used to follow before so many of us started getting sick.

Using the same data from 2012's «Searching for a Mate» study, a Ph.D. candidate at Michigan State came to the opposite conclusion about online dating and relationship quality.

Another study of charter schools in North Carolina comes to some of the same conclusions.

Dozens of studies have come to the same conclusion: online discussions strengthen student engagement and learning.

While Lovenheim's study used data from just three states, Andrew Coulson, using national data, also came to the same conclusion.

While Lovenheim's study used data from just three states, Cato Institute's Andrew Coulson, using national data, came to the same conclusion.

More recent studies from the Educational Testing Service, Notre Dame, and Stanford looked at the same data sets and came to similar conclusions.

Through visiting the same village, interviewing Asmat kinsmen, studying the tense political climate of the time and combing through archives of official documents along with Rockefeller's personal correspondence, Hoffman comes to the grim conclusion that he was cannibalized.

What we always about is some lead / lag indicators (which may a very simple one like TTM / current P / E or a very complex model) and then we theorise based upon the model which we use and that there are enough empirical studies done on the same thing which help you to come to a reasonable conclusion about the findings of your theory / hypothesis.

Perhaps a half dozen similar studies have been published since then, and they all come to essentially the same conclusion: Consistent outperformance can not be reliably identified in advance.

As Paul Meehl (one of the founding fathers of the importance of quant models versus human judgements) wrote: There is no controversy in social science which shows such a large body of qualitatively diverse studies coming out so uniformly in the same direction as this one... predicting everything from the outcomes of football games to the diagnosis of liver disease and when you can hardly come up with a half a dozen studies showing even a weak tendencyin favour of the clinician, it is time to draw a practical conclusion.

A number of studies were conducted over the last decade and each came to the same conclusion: There is very little difference in the heat efficiency between a brick - to - brick new window replacement and a retrofitted window combined with a storm window, as long as the windows were low - E.

After studying data from the post-Graham era, we have come to the same conclusion as Graham: cheapness is everything; quality is a nice - to - have.

Using essentially the same IPCC model projections, the two studies come to very different conclusions with regard to key projected quantities, such as the seasonally - integrated powerfulness of TCs or «power dissipation index» (PDI).

They all come to the same conclusion (although most show greater long time scale variability than the original MBH study, which I consider to be one of the actual weaknesses of the original methodology.

That change will not happen until a majority of them study the issues and come to conclusions based on factual information, rather than «noise» from interest groups or from pandering to same.

Both papers come to the same broad conclusion, summarized in our figure, that unless humankind puts on the brakes very quickly and aggressively (i.e. global reductions of 80 % by 2050), we face a high probability of driving climate beyond a 2 °C threshold taken by both studies as a «danger limit».

A number of major studies looking at paleoclimate data come to the same conclusion.

Every peer - reviewed scientific study of the matter comes to the same conclusions.»

Nicole Chuetz over at Terrapass, however, comes to a different conclusion from the same study.