Sentences with phrase «study design reviewed»

Additionally all UTUC patients provided informed consent using the consent form and study design reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at National Taiwan University and Stony Brook University.

All patients provided informed consent using the consent form and study design reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at National Taiwan University and Stony Brook University.

Not exact matches

But a 2015 review concluded that, in general, the evidence on nasal irrigation comes from studies that are small and poorly designed.

This guy is more than welcome to present published PEER REVIEWED scientific studies arguing the case for magically design.

Would an institutional review board for research ever approve a similar study design?

This year, the company is recognizing its past by offering a «throwback» label based on a 1960s - era design, as well as http://www.fooddrink-magazine.com Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Food and Drink - Summer 2010 Food and Drink - Summer 2010 Contents News Book Review Case Study Dr. Praeger H.C. Schau and Son J&G Foods Inc..

The authors» responsibilities were as follows — CNM: had leadership responsibility for the research planning and execution, wrote the manuscript, and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; CNM, HE, and BN: formulated the study idea and designed the research; EV and JM: managed the day - to - day conduct of the study and oversaw the data collection; YJ: performed statistical analyses of the study data; and all authors: provided critical review and commentary on the draft of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

About Legends Hospitality Legends, owned by the New York Yankees, the Dallas Cowboys and the Checketts Partners Investor Fund, is an industry leading sports entertainment company with disciplines focused on sales and marketing, hospitality, and feasibility market analysis and includes: Legends Hospitality, a premier provider of general concessions, premium food & beverage, catering, and retail merchandise; Legends Global Sales, which offers team owners, facility operators and athletic departments premium tickets sales and service, PSL sales execution, CRM, sponsorship and naming rights capabilities and sales training; Legends Global Planning, which provides project feasibility, economic impact studies, funding plans and business operational reviews.; and Legends Attractions, which combines its best - in - class design, sales and marketing, hospitality and merchandise services to create memorable Guest experiences in the Observatory and Stadium Tour industries.

Last week, we posted to the site a group of four articles about a peer - reviewed study in the Journal of Neurosurgery showing that football helmet design affected concussion risk among a large group (or what scientists call a «cohort») of college football players.

Rixa Freeze PhD asks in her 2010 article published within Expert Reviews Obstetrics & Gynecology, «Could a series of large, well - designed studies finally heal the rift between advocates and opponents?

We thank John C. Pezzullo, PhD, and Dawn Misra, PhD, for their statistical support and thoughtful review of this manuscript, and Yvonne Bronner, SCD, for her contribution to the study design.

The review of home visiting programs described above included only studies using rigorous designs and measurement.

Role of the Funder / Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Role of the Funder / Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Declan Devane is a co-author in one of the included trials in this review (Begley 2011) Jane Sandall was and is principal investigator for two studies evaluating models of midwife - led continuity of care (Sandall 2001), and co-investigator on the «Birthplace in England Research Programme», an integrated programme of research designed to compare outcomes of births for women planned at home, in different types of midwifery units, and in hospital units with obstetric services.

BN: At least five psychology journals are inviting people to submit plans for replicating specific studies, which will then get peer - reviewed on the basis of their designs [rather than their results].

Westinghouse said in a statement Friday that it was «confident in the AP1000 design and its passive safety features, as it is one of the most studied, reviewed and analyzed nuclear power plant designs in the history of the commercial nuclear power industry.»

But a recent analysis of scientific studies in neuroscience, which was published online in Nature Reviews Neuroscience earlier this month, urges caution both in reading the literature and in designing your own experiments.

Charles Tart, a psychologist at the University of California at Davis, who did the first major study of out - of - body experiences in 1969, and Raymond Moody... designed experiments of questionable rigor and made matters worse by ignoring the peer - review process and publishing their results in best - selling books.»

Examining more than 100 peer - reviewed studies of predator control, the study found not a single lethal control study that met scientists» gold standard: a randomized, controlled design.

At STAT's request, eight independent experts reviewed informational handouts about the clinical trial, and all sharply criticized the study's marketing, design, and scientific rationale.

«I think the Cochrane review highlighted the possibilities and benefits of using clonidine for pre-op sedation, [anxiety] and post-op pain, but we still need more well - designed, controlled studies before clonidine can be recommended as the pre-op drug of choice,» Zeltzer said.

They hand out bad grades all around, finding that, «The design, management, review and release of the study... fell short of contemporary standards for scientific work.»

A systematic review is an analysis of the results of multiple, carefully designed studies available on a topic.

For example, there is a lot of interest on collaborative team science, study registration, stronger study designs and statistical tools, and better peer review, along with making scientific data, analyses and protocols widely available so that others can replicate experiments, thereby fostering trust in the conclusions of those studies.

An increasing number of journals, including Nature and Science, have adopted measures such as checklists for study design and reporting while improving statistical review and encouraging access to data and protocols.

In a review article published in 2010, physician Max H. Pittler of the German Cochrane Center at the University of Freiburg and physician Edzard Ernst of the Peninsula Medical School in Exeter, England, analyzed 12 well - designed studies comparing kava with a placebo for the treatment of anxiety.

The bill also puts a roadblock in NIH's controversial plan to revamp how pregnant women will be recruited for the study: NIH can make «no changes to the current design or Vanguard pilot structure until at least 90 days after the IOM [Institute of Medicine] conducts a review of the proposed changes and impact on the results.»

Based on this review, they suggest a «probable» association between vitamin D levels and birth weight, dental caries in children, maternal vitamin D levels at term and parathyroid hormone levels in chronic kidney disease patients requiring dialysis, but «further studies and better designed trials are needed to draw further conclusions.»

Often, the law requires EPA to use «the best available science» in designing regulations, and ORD scientists and outside researchers that the office recruits for review panels are tasked with deciding which studies meet that standard.

The measure aims to make chemical safety reviews more science - based, and includes provisions designed to reduce the use of animals in chemical testing and promote the study of so - called cancer clusters.

For each paper a Registered Report detailing the proposed experimental designs and protocols for the replications is peer reviewed and published prior to data collection; the results of these experiments are then published as a Replication Study.

Role of the Funder / Sponsor: Neither of the funding organizations played any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

The FDA reviews the study design and the data to see if they want to approve the drug regardless of where the study was done.

The conduct of NCI - supported trials involves a complex system of designing, reviewing and initiating studies.

and N.L.P. contributed to the study design and reviewed the manuscript.

The peer - reviewed study, which used an app specifically designed for the Apple Watch, is believed to be the first on utilizing a smartwatch to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) or any arrhythmia.

The institutional review board of the University of Pittsburgh approved the study design and consent forms before data collection.

None of the funders or the sponsor (University of Oxford) played any role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; nor in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

The Scientific Review Committee (SRC) ensures that all cancer clinical trials conducted under the auspices of the Vanderbilt - Ingram Cancer Center meet peer - reviewed standards of scientific design, including appropriate scientific rationale, specific aims, study endpoints, biostatistical analysis, and adequate ability to accrue patients.

Role of the Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Role of the Sponsors: The role of the funding organizations was solely to provide funding for support of the project for peer review; these organizations had no role in the design or conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Role of the Funder / Sponsor: The Kaiser Foundation Research Institute Community Benefit had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Role of the Funder / Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Role of the Funder / Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Consulting Services Southern Research's experts can be accessed through consulting arrangements when our input is needed to design studies, provide third - party review of data, conduct due diligence analysis, or provide technical input.

When we asked researchers what they'd fix about science, many talked about the scientific process itself, about study design or peer review.

We believe that many trials included in this review have limitations regarding their study design, analysis and reporting of their results.

In this review, we present a practical guide to help researchers design their first scRNA - seq studies, including introductory information on experimental hardware, protocol choice, quality control, data analysis and biological interpretation.

The systematic review methodology has several key principles: transparency, comprehensiveness and evaluation of the primary research study design.