The only thing I find noteworthy is that it further reinforces the
point that there is no scientific consensus on a best estimate for
equilibrium climate sensitivity, which is entirely in agreement with the IPCC's statement in AR5 WG1 SPM: «No best estimate for
equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and
studies.»
Future
studies involving three (or more) time
points in which the parental behaviors, EF and academic outcomes were measured at different time
points would permit the underlying assumptions of stationarity and
equilibrium to be tested formally (Cole and Maxwell, 2003).