Sentences with phrase «study include»

Limitations of the study include its reliance on survey participants to accurately recall and report what they ate and drank, as well as the potential for diet fads or food trends in popular culture to influence how people described their diets, the authors note.
Limitations of the study include its observational nature and the self - reported diet assessments.
Co-authors on the study include Collin Challis, Janette Boulden, Avin Veerakumar, Julie Espallergues, and R. Christopher Pierce from Penn's department of Psychiatry.
Other authors of the study include: Marta García - Arévalo and Iván Quesada of the Universidad Miguel Hernández and CIBERDEM, the Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Disorders.
Other researchers involved in this study include Sumitra Sengupta, Meera Saxena, Quigguo Xu and Justin Hanes, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Ding Ding and Hongkai Ju, of the Johns Hopkins University.
Limitations of the study include the small numbers of people participating in NHANES who were identified as having a diagnosis of celiac disease and as adhering to a gluten - free diet without celiac disease.
Limitations of the study include that people with severe Parkinson's disease were not included, which could affect the ability to detect an association between disease severity and caffeine levels.
Other contributors to the study include Benoit Biteau, Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Co-authors of the study include Drs. Andrew T. Gewirtz, Katharine E. McCann, Linda Q. Beach and Katherine A. Partrick of Georgia State.
The coauthors of the study include graduate student Caroline Morley and professor of astronomy and astrophysics Jonathan Fortney at UC Santa Cruz; Katelyn Allers at Bucknell University; Thomas Geballe at Gemini Observatory; Mark Marley and Roxana Lupu at NASA Ames Research Center; Jacqueline Faherty at the Carnegie Institution of Washington; and Gordon Bjoraker at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Other Johns Hopkins researchers who participated in this study include Alison W. Rebman, Ting Yang, Erica A. Mihm, Mark J. Soloski and Cheryl Novak.
Other authors on this study include Nicole Geller, Timothy Heeren, and Michael J. Corwin.
Other investigators on the study include Kathryn Monroe, Zhiyuan Yang, and Isa Muñoz - Arias from the Gladstone Institutes, and David Levy from New York University College of Dentistry.
Limitations of the study include a small sample size.
Co-authors of the study include: Jean - Sébastien Jouhanneau, Leiron Ferrarese, Luc Estebanez and James F.A. Poulet from the Department of Neuroscience at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in Berlin and the Neuroscience Research Center at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Nick J. Audette, a doctoral student in the Department of Biological Sciences at Carnegie Mellon and the CNBC; and Michael Brecht from the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience at Humboldt University in Berlin and the the Neuroscience Research Center at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Contributors to the work: Other Buck Institute researchers involved in the study include James Flynn, who wrote the manuscript, Monique O'Leary, Christopher Zambataro, Emmeline Academia, Michael Presley, Brittany Garrett, Artem Zykovich, Sean Mooney, and Pankaj Kapahi.
Authors of the study include researchers from the University of Minnesota, University of Delaware, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Sironix Renewables, and the U.S. Department of Energy's Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation and Argonne National Laboratory.
Other Dana - Farber contributors to the study include Levi Garraway, MD, PhD, a co-senior author, Mary - Ellen Taplin, MD, Mark Pomerantz, MD, and Massimo Loda, MD, director of Dana - Farber's Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology.
Authors of the new study include SDSC's Goetz and Walker as well as Matthew A. Clark, who developed part of the software during his internship with Walker and Goetz, as part of SDSC's Research Experience for High School Students (REHS) program and later as an undergraduate research intern in the WMD lab.
In addition to Hong and Sotiropoulos, other University of Minnesota researchers who were part of this study include civil engineering assistant professor Michele Guala, mechanical engineering Ph.D. student Mostafa Toloui, civil engineering Ph.D. student Kevin Howard, mechanical engineering student Sean Riley, St. Anthony Falls Lab engineer James Tucker, and former post-doctoral researcher Leonardo Chamorro who is now at the University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign.
Co-authors of the study include Ladie Kimberly C. De La Cruz, Zhixiang Pan, Bingchen Yu and Xingyue Ji of Georgia State and Stéphane L. Benoit and Robert J. Maier of the University of Georgia.
Other participants in the study include: Stacey Knight, PhD; David Min, MD; Kurt Jensen, MS; Donald Lappé, MD; Ritesh Dhar, MD; Kent Meredith, MD; Steve Mason, MD; Jeffrey Anderson, MD; Brent Muhlestein, MD; and Kirk Knowlton, MD..
Limitations of the study include that the questionnaires did not ask about other problems that can occur after stroke, such as communication issues.
Some of the recommendations from the RAND study include waiving civil service rules that impede the hiring of talented cybersecurity professionals, maintaining government hiring of these professionals through sequestrations, funding software licenses and related equipment for educational programs, refining tests to identify candidates likely to succeed in these careers, and developing methods to attract women into the field.
Limitations of the study include that the study estimated exposure to pesticides based on women's self - reported intake combined with pesticide residue surveillance data rather than through direct measurement.
Other contributors to this PNAS study include Iman Aganj, Gregroy Wojtkiewicz, Sandeep Hedgire, and Ralph Weissleder of Massachusetts General Hospital; and Christophe Benoist and Diane Mathis of Harvard Medical School.
Other areas of study include tinkering with nanoparticles» shape (a more elongated design could more easily navigate the body) and materials that have a lower molecular weight but pack the same punch.
Discourses generated from this study include; «every pregnancy is treated with suspicion until proven otherwise», «modern medicine knows best and women are best served to listen to the experts».
Discourses generated from this study include; «maternity care options need to be expanded to allow women choice in the care they receive», «the demonization of women who choose to give birth naturally».
Strengths of our study include a prospective design, detailed contemporaneous measurement of duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding, and measurement of numerous potential confounding variables, including the home environment and maternal IQ.
The limitations of this study include possible selection bias and recall bias.
Limitations of the study include that the women were asked to remember information from years earlier, so they may not have remembered everything correctly, and that the reasons for not breastfeeding or breastfeeding only for a short period of time were not investigated.
Other strengths of the underpinning cohort study include high participation by midwifery units and trusts in England; the minimisation of selection bias through achievement of a high response rate and absence of self selection bias because of non-consent; and the ability to compare groups that were similar in terms of identified clinical risk.12 The economic evaluation was conducted according to nationally agreed design and reporting guidelines.15 26 Collection of primary unit cost data was thorough and accounted for regional differences in care patterns.
The strengths of our study include a well characterized group of more than 3700 infants, with varying demographic characteristics drawn from 2 discrete geographic regions, and longitudinal follow - up for 6 months, including reports of infant sleep position at 1, 3, and 6 months.
The strengths of the study include the ability to compare outcomes by the woman's planned place of birth at the start of care in labour, the high participation of midwifery units and trusts in England, the large sample size and statistical power to detect clinically important differences in adverse perinatal outcomes, the minimisation of selection bias through achievement of a high response rate and absence of self selection bias due to non-consent, the ability to compare groups that were similar in terms of identified clinical risk (according to current clinical guidelines) and to further increase the comparability of the groups by conducting an additional analysis restricted to women with no complicating conditions identified at the start of care in labour, and the ability to control for several important potential confounders.
Key highlights from the study include:
The major strengths of this study include the use of monadic testing, whereby each participant was exposed to a single labelling system for performance testing.
Examples set out in the study include a ruling that no Muslim woman may marry a non-Muslim man unless he converts to Islam and that any children of a woman who does should be taken from her until she marries a Muslim.
Highlights of the study include: 1.)
Other crucial discoveries that were made under the study include 281 apps that collected the location or contact data of children without asking for permission from parents, and 1,100 apps that shared persistent identifying information that can be used for behavioral advertising methods that are banned to be used on children.
States excluded from the study include Maine and South Dakota due to insufficient and / or unavailable data.
Key findings for the North American (U.S. and Canada) workforce surveyed in the study include: • 51 % of employees are not happy at work • 45 % of employees trust their company's leadership • 61 % of employees don't know their company's mission • 57 % of employees are not motivated by their company's mission • 60 % of employees don't know their company's vision • 57 % of employees don't feel recognized for their progress at work • 61 % of employees don't know their organization's cultural values • 50 % of employees don't expect to be with their organization a year from now
Additionally, important areas for further study include employment for older workers and individuals with disabilities.
Driving forces cited in the study include increasing life expectancy, elimination of pensions, economic uncertainy and re-visioning of later life towards purpose and social engagement.
The study included over 200 employees at a variety of companies, and had participants self - report their performance on a daily basis.
The study included older millennials, whose saving habits look a lot different than the rest of their generational cohort.
The study included a series of five experiments that involved 557 participants.
The study included more than 2,000 players — all of those drafted by the NFL from 1996 to 2003.
The Pew study includes demographic data on Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn that are worth a look.
The study included two surveys labeled «word of mouth» and «buzz,» which asked respondents whether they had talked about a brand with friends or family members and if they'd noticed more positive or negative sentiments around a brand in the past two weeks, respectively.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z