Not exact matches
In terms
of the children's
relationships with their parents,
sibling rivalry, and their own self - esteem, Jeannie Kidwell, a former professor
of family
studies at the University
of Tennessee in Knoxville, says the best time to have another baby is either when your first is younger than 1 or older than 4.
«
Siblings of children with disability were more likely than siblings residing with typically developing children to have problems with interpersonal relationships, psychopathological functioning, functioning at school, and use of leisure time,» according to a 201
Siblings of children with disability were more likely than
siblings residing with typically developing children to have problems with interpersonal relationships, psychopathological functioning, functioning at school, and use of leisure time,» according to a 201
siblings residing with typically developing children to have problems with interpersonal
relationships, psychopathological functioning, functioning at school, and use
of leisure time,» according to a 2013
study.
Led by Professor Dieter Wolke (senior author) at Warwick's Department
of Psychology, this is the first
study to explore the
relationship between
sibling bullying and the development
of psychotic disorders.
Social psychologist Bella DePaulo analyzed 814
studies in 2016 and concluded that single people tend to be more self - reliant and motivated than those in a
relationship, they're closer to their parents, friends, and
siblings and are more likely to grow as individuals over long periods
of time.
Thus, the aim
of this
study was to understand if children reported stronger
relationships with their pets than
siblings, and how gender and pet species could change the quality
of these
relationships.
A
study by the University
of Cambridge showed that children are more satisfied in
relationships with their pets than ones with their own
siblings.
For an odd little
study published in the Journal
of Applied Developmental Psychology, researchers in the U.K. surveyed 77 12 - year - olds about their
relationships with their pets and their
relationships with their
siblings.
Sibling relationships, even when there is some normal rivalry, teach children to socialize and develop fruitful
relationships later in life, found a
study conducted by the University
of Cambridge Centre for Family Research and published in the book «Social Understanding and Social Lives.»
Information shared by mental health practitioners and social workers in this
study affirmed these findings and provided insights into the possible effects
of reverse - migration separation, such as the lack
of parent - child attachment upon reunification, conflicting
relationships between the parent and child, and rivalry between
siblings who were raised by their parents versus ones who were sent back to China.
Studies have shown that the quality
of the
relationship between
siblings has great significance for the mentally ill
sibling's overall quality
of life.
Factors that we
studied that were not associated with any disciplinary type or response group in the analyses performed included child manageability, maternal depression,
relationship of the mother to the child (biological or other caregiver), and the number
of siblings of the child.
Recent
studies have examined how cultural factors affect family and
sibling relationships and adjustment to disability, and how
siblings participate in the care
of children with a variety
of chronic illnesses such as asthma, diabetes, and GI disorders.
Our second aim was to assess this
relationship by comparing levels
of anxiety and depression symptoms within
sibling groups, while our third aim was to
study the
relationship between the combined anxiety and depression symptom loads
of adolescents and parents and later receipt
of medical benefits in young adult offspring.
The
study confirmed the finding that the environment not shared by
siblings was by far the largest (in many cases, the sole) nongenetic contributor to the adolescents» behavior and adjustment, but it eliminated all
of the following as possible sources
of nonshared environmental influence: «differential marital conflict about the adolescent versus the sib, differential parenting toward
siblings, and asymmetrical
relationships the sibs construct with each other» (Reiss, 2000, p. 407).
Course / workshop context may include the
study of individual, interpersonal
relationships (marital, parental,
sibling), family development and life cycle, marriage, sociology
of the family, families, family phenomenology, contemporary families, families and culture, aging and family issues, family violence and related family concerns.
The goal
of this
study was to examine the
relationship between maternal differential treatment
of the
siblings, direct parenting
of older
siblings, and older
siblings» behavior problems across middle childhood.
This
study found the most significant problem identified by
siblings was the disruption caused by the behaviour
of the child with the condition.Examples
of this disruptive behaviour included physical and verbal aggression, out -
of - control hyperactivity, emotional and social immaturity, academic underachievement and learning problems, family conflicts, poor peer
relationships, and difficult
relationships with extended family.
Despite the general belief that
sibling relationships are unique in duration across the lifespan and the demonstrated importance
of these
relationships in childhood, to date, no
studies have specifically explored
sibling attachment in adulthood.
These
studies suggest that
siblings of children with cancer have decreased opportunities for social encounters and while friends are an important source
of support and distraction for
siblings,
relationships can be disrupted by attention toward the child with cancer.
This
study contributes significantly to our knowledge
of the social functioning
of siblings of children with cancer and indicates that overall,
siblings» peer
relationships are strikingly similar to matched classroom peers.
In this
study, we examined the
sibling relationship from an attachment perspective by exploring the influence
of attachment on
sibling conflict and cooperation.
If, however, further
studies replicate the finding that DZ twins are as equally likely attached to their
sibling as to their romantic partner, it could be predicted that this attachment is a potential source
of conflict in the
relationship.
We propose that one
of the most promising socioemotional factors to take into consideration in
studying sibling relationship quality is perceptions
of parental differential treatment within the family in adulthood.
The absence
of strong and consistent structural predictors
of sibling relationship quality mirrors that found in the
study of parent — adult child relations.
The purpose
of the
study was to investigate how family functioning (defined as the ability that family members hold to manage stressful events, and intimate and social
relationships), the degree to which family members feel happy and fulfilled with each other (called family satisfaction), and the demographical characteristics
of siblings (age and gender) impacted on
sibling relationships.
The purpose
of this
study was to examine typically - developing adolescents» perceived
relationship quality with their developmentally - disabled
sibling, specifically
siblings diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or Down syndrome (DS).
With regard to the
sibling effect, relatively little attention has been devoted to the role
of siblings and their impact on one another's development, in comparison to the wealth
of studies on parent - child
relationships (Howe & Recchia, 2006).
Lastly, when testing whether the influences
of sibling bullying, friend bullying, and parent — child
relationship quality vary between male and female adolescents, this
study finds some significant gender differences.
The current
study examined how different types
of parentification during childhood (retrospectively - reported) related to distress outcomes and attitudes about
sibling relationships among 41 TD adult
siblings of individuals with ASD.