Not exact matches
So you take what the early church fathers, the ones trying to legitimize their religion as much as possible, the ones saying that all the similarities are products
of the devil, and just take their word rather than
actual archaeological
evidence and anthropological
study?
The authors concluded that the
actual gap may be much smaller, as they found «
evidence of bias in the meta - dataset toward
studies reporting higher conventional yields.»
«While the
evidence of the effectiveness
of brain training remains controversial, our results suggest that the public is interested in learning more about the
actual science behind the claims made by the app developers, «says Dr. John Torous, a clinical psychiatrist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, lead author
of the
study.
«It's incredibly exciting to think there is even a chance that
actual observational
evidence for a multiverse might be found in our lifetimes,» says Alan Guth, a cosmologist at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology in Cambridge, who was not involved in the
study.
Scientific
studies surrounding the use
of the topical application
of ginkgo, caffeine or retinoids have provided no real
evidence of repair or improvement
of the
actual problem like many
of these companies claim.
Combined with rigorous evaluations like MET, these
studies of the effects
of actual implementation on teaching and learning can provide the
evidence we really need.
This only leaves us to assume that since they were not reported the
actual strength
of the similarities empirically observed between was likely low (as is also
evidenced in many other
studies, although not as often with student survey indicators as opposed to observational indicators.)
There is LOTS
of evidence for a global MWP (
studies from all over the globe using different paleo methodologies, composite
studies from several sites, historical records from all over the civilized world at the time,
actual physical
evidence, etc..)
This
evidence includes multiple finger - print and attribution
studies, strong correlations between fossil fuel use and increases in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, carbon isotope
evidence that is supports that elevated carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere are from fossil sources, and model predictions that best fit
actual observed greenhouse gas concentrations that support human activities as the source
of atmospheric concentrations.
But in two
of these seven populations (Davis Strait and Southern Beaufort Sea) there was good
evidence from
actual population
studies that numbers were increasing, which was overturned in the final analysis by «estimates»
of decline.
IPCC relied heavily on the since discredited Mann hockey stick and «spaghetti copies», but the number
of studies cited by NIPCC make a pretty strong argument for a warmer MWP, as extensive historical records as well as
actual physical
evidence from today have also suggested.
Anyone who's ever lived near a weather station close enough to see it on a regular basis probably has been providing anecdotal
evidence of this for decades, but having an
actual study to back it up has taken WAY too long.
Send me TWO links, one to the paper claiming the detection
of solar sunspot - cycle related effects on surface datasets that you think is the strongest
evidence for your case, and the second to the
actual data used in that
study.
Loehle 2008 is one
of several independent
studies from all over the world using different paleoclimate methodologies as well as
actual physical
evidence, which have also shown that there was a MWP, that it was global and that it was slightly warmer than today.
One
study using
evidence from stomata
of fossilized leaves suggests greater variability, with carbon dioxide mole fractions above 300 ppm during the period seven to ten thousand years ago, [70] though others have argued that these findings more likely reflect calibration or contamination problems rather than
actual CO2 variability.
The court also noted that Genzyme had
actual notice
of the in vivo
studies, and had the opportunity to rebut the
evidence.
Pointless until one can provide
actual evidence and thorough
study that these devices can cause any sort
of health issue.
This
study sheds much light on the
actual effects
of the No Child Left Behind Act despite speckled
evidence that claim it helped improved student achievement over the last decade and a half.