Sentences with phrase «study of the actual evidence»

Not exact matches

So you take what the early church fathers, the ones trying to legitimize their religion as much as possible, the ones saying that all the similarities are products of the devil, and just take their word rather than actual archaeological evidence and anthropological study?
The authors concluded that the actual gap may be much smaller, as they found «evidence of bias in the meta - dataset toward studies reporting higher conventional yields.»
«While the evidence of the effectiveness of brain training remains controversial, our results suggest that the public is interested in learning more about the actual science behind the claims made by the app developers, «says Dr. John Torous, a clinical psychiatrist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, lead author of the study.
«It's incredibly exciting to think there is even a chance that actual observational evidence for a multiverse might be found in our lifetimes,» says Alan Guth, a cosmologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, who was not involved in the study.
Scientific studies surrounding the use of the topical application of ginkgo, caffeine or retinoids have provided no real evidence of repair or improvement of the actual problem like many of these companies claim.
Combined with rigorous evaluations like MET, these studies of the effects of actual implementation on teaching and learning can provide the evidence we really need.
This only leaves us to assume that since they were not reported the actual strength of the similarities empirically observed between was likely low (as is also evidenced in many other studies, although not as often with student survey indicators as opposed to observational indicators.)
There is LOTS of evidence for a global MWP (studies from all over the globe using different paleo methodologies, composite studies from several sites, historical records from all over the civilized world at the time, actual physical evidence, etc..)
This evidence includes multiple finger - print and attribution studies, strong correlations between fossil fuel use and increases in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, carbon isotope evidence that is supports that elevated carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere are from fossil sources, and model predictions that best fit actual observed greenhouse gas concentrations that support human activities as the source of atmospheric concentrations.
But in two of these seven populations (Davis Strait and Southern Beaufort Sea) there was good evidence from actual population studies that numbers were increasing, which was overturned in the final analysis by «estimates» of decline.
IPCC relied heavily on the since discredited Mann hockey stick and «spaghetti copies», but the number of studies cited by NIPCC make a pretty strong argument for a warmer MWP, as extensive historical records as well as actual physical evidence from today have also suggested.
Anyone who's ever lived near a weather station close enough to see it on a regular basis probably has been providing anecdotal evidence of this for decades, but having an actual study to back it up has taken WAY too long.
Send me TWO links, one to the paper claiming the detection of solar sunspot - cycle related effects on surface datasets that you think is the strongest evidence for your case, and the second to the actual data used in that study.
Loehle 2008 is one of several independent studies from all over the world using different paleoclimate methodologies as well as actual physical evidence, which have also shown that there was a MWP, that it was global and that it was slightly warmer than today.
One study using evidence from stomata of fossilized leaves suggests greater variability, with carbon dioxide mole fractions above 300 ppm during the period seven to ten thousand years ago, [70] though others have argued that these findings more likely reflect calibration or contamination problems rather than actual CO2 variability.
The court also noted that Genzyme had actual notice of the in vivo studies, and had the opportunity to rebut the evidence.
Pointless until one can provide actual evidence and thorough study that these devices can cause any sort of health issue.
This study sheds much light on the actual effects of the No Child Left Behind Act despite speckled evidence that claim it helped improved student achievement over the last decade and a half.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z