In their new report Renewing Our Cities: A Case
Study on School Choice's Role -LSB-...]
Lake and DeArmond examine Fordham's new
study on school choice in light of findings from our recent Measuring Up report, and conclude that choice friendliness is no guarantee of good things happening for kids.
The introduction of randomized field trials to education research is as much a boon to knowledge as the results from any single
study on school choice.
This damning statistic from last week's New School
study on school choice exposes the absurdity of new Chancellor Richard Carranza's vow that «all students will be supported» as he aims to desegregate the system.
Dr. Ladner has written numerous
studies on school choice, charter schools and special education reform.
The Editorial Projects in Education Research Center reported that Peterson's
studies on school choice and vouchers were among the country's most influential studies of education policy.
Ladner has written numerous
studies on school choice, charter schools, and special education reform, and has published articles in Education Next, the Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, and the British Journal of Political Science.
For more than a decade, empirical
studies on school choice programs have shown improvements in educational performance and results for both students and schools.
In fact, the evidence from the 7 rigorous
studies on school choice programs with long - term outcomes suggests that portfolio management and other heavy regulations are neither necessary nor desirable for producing long - term gains for students.
The School Voucher Research Wars
Studies on school choice can offer little ammo for either side, but that hasn't stopped opponents and proponents alike from firing away.
MacIver Institute: Empirical
Studies on School Choice Overwhelmingly Find Positive Effects, Review Shows http://bit.ly/1WOX0oZ
One indicator that this study may sufficiently account for both selection and omitted variable bias, is that its results are consistent with randomized
studies on schools choice that also find no relationship between choice and student outcomes 7 8 9.
Akin to the earlier analysis of EdChoice and several other
studies on school choice - driven competition, this analysis reveals that the initiative improved public schools» academic performance.
Not exact matches
In a
study that surveyed the nation's 100 largest
school districts, New York City scored an A-minus
on school choice and competition.
That's the finding of a new
study published in the Journal of Marketing Research: «Healthy
Choice: The Effect of Simplified Point - of - Sale Nutritional Information
on Consumer Food
Choice Behavior,» co-authored by Hristina Nikolova, the Coughlin Assistant Professor of Marketing at the Carroll
School of Management at Boston College and J. Jeffrey Inman, Associate Dean for Research and Faculty and the Albert Wesley Frey Professor of Marketing at the University of Pittsburgh Joseph M. Katz Graduate
School of Business.
UF / IFAS assistant professor of food and resource economics Jaclyn Kropp — along with economists at Georgia State University, Clemson University and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — worked with a county
school food services director to develop a novel research model to
study school lunch
choices children make, combining lunch sales data collected at the cafeteria register with data
on student absences.
«Better food
choices near
schools for healthier teeth:
Study on oral health prevention.»
«Scholarships give our students the gift of freedom: to make career
choices based
on purpose and passion, rather than the price of education; to use time to
study, explore science, and volunteer to help others, rather than working to make ends meet; and to succeed because someone who never met them saw enough potential to invest in their dreams,» said Catherine Lucey, MD, vice dean for education at UCSF's
School of Medicine.
These
studies show, consistently, that parental
schools of
choice not controlled by public
school districts 1) are usually prohibited by law from screening out students based
on admission exams, 2) use ability tracking less frequently than traditional public
schools even when, legally, they can, and 3) may use ability tracking, but when they do, it is less likely to have a negative effect
on the achievement of low - track students.
High
school students using PBL in American
studies performed as well
on multiple -
choice tests as students who received a traditional model of instruction, and they showed a deeper understanding of content (Gallagher & Stepien, 1996).
Two conclusions from recent PISA
studies are that increased national performance is associated with greater equity in the distribution of educational resources and that equity can be undermined when
school choice segregates students into
schools based
on socioeconomic background.
In addition, 86 % of day students at the
school were accepted into their first -
choice university, of which over a third of students (38 %) will be going
on to
study at a top 10 ranked university in the country.
Hess's second case
study focuses
on the five - year - old voucher plan in Cleveland, where he finds that the potential benefits of
choice and competition were neutralized by multiple factors, including frequent changes in leadership, the state's move to take over the city's
schools, the modest size of the vouchers (only $ 2,250), and the existence of strong unions.
The Milwaukee
school choice program and the response of Milwaukee Public
Schools are especially significant in light of Frederick M. Hess's
study of the effects of competition
on large urban
school districts.
The
study examines the impact of winning a
school choice lottery
on dropout rates and crime for groups of students with different propensities to commit crimes, using an index of crime risk that includes test scores, demographics, behavior, and neighborhood characteristics to identify the highest - risk group.
Hess uses these case
studies to speculate
on how
choice might be introduced in ways that both respect the built - in political and organizational constraints of urban
school districts and lead to
school improvement.
The three
studies find neutral to positive impacts of private
school choice on college enrollment and graduation, but with some variation:
The book emerged from the authors»
study of
choice programs in the
schools of San Antonio, but it became an attempt at a sweeping synthesis of scholarly work
on education policy, drawing
on literature in philosophy, economics, political science, education, and law.
Your article
on the Milwaukee
school -
choice evaluation («New Studies on Private Choice Contradict Each Other,» Sept. 4, 1996) accurately reports that our study of the Milwaukee choice program found that choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
choice evaluation («New
Studies on Private
Choice Contradict Each Other,» Sept. 4, 1996) accurately reports that our study of the Milwaukee choice program found that choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
Choice Contradict Each Other,» Sept. 4, 1996) accurately reports that our
study of the Milwaukee
choice program found that choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
choice program found that
choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice sc
choice students outperformed a comparable control group of Milwaukee Public
Schools students on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the choice s
Schools students
on standardized tests by a considerable amount after three and four years of experience in the
choice sc
choice schoolsschools.
The most commonly cited
school choice review, by economists Cecilia Rouse and Lisa Barrow, declares that it will focus
on the evidence from existing experimental
studies but then leaves out four such
studies (three of which reported positive
choice effects) and includes one
study that was non-experimental (and found no significant effect of
choice).
Finally, most of the previous reviews of the evidence
on school choice have generated more fog than light, mainly because they have been arbitrary or incomplete in their selection of
studies to review.
The
studies were conducted as a partnership with the
School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas and look at the impact of the vouchers
on student achievement and non-cognitive skills,
on racial segregation, and
on students attending nearby public
schools (competitive effects).
The Commission, chaired by Dr. Paul Hill of the University of Washington, carefully reviewed the research
on the impact of
school choice on student achievement and included in its report the following statement: «The most rigorous
school choice evaluations that used random assignment... found that academic gains from vouchers were largely limited to the African - American students in their
studies.»
When they insist that ideas like
school choice, performance pay, and teacher evaluations based
on value - added measures will themselves boost student achievement, would - be reformers stifle creativity, encourage their allies to lock elbows and march forward rather than engage in useful debate and reflection, turn every reform proposal into an us - against - them steel - cage match, and push researchers into the awkward position of
studying whether reforms «work» rather than when, why, and how they make it easier to improve
schooling.
A
study by Matthew M. Chingos and Paul E. Peterson
on the long - term impact of
school vouchers on college enrollment and graduation won the 2016 Association for Education Finance and Policy (AEFP) Prize awarded for Best Academic Paper on School Choice and R
school vouchers
on college enrollment and graduation won the 2016 Association for Education Finance and Policy (AEFP) Prize awarded for Best Academic Paper
on School Choice and R
School Choice and Reform.
As we continue to
study choice - based policies in K — 12 education, one challenge we must confront is the push - pull created by high - stakes accountability measures designed to assess
schools, students, and educators, based solely
on test scores — an area where
choice proponents and opponents often find common ground.
Given a half - century of failure from
school reform, great priority should be given to the further
study of the effects of
school choice in empowering parents over educators and
school boards and its effects
on advancing student achievement and parent satisfaction.
Now, a new monograph, «Beyond Partisan Politics: A Response to the Carnegie Report
on School Choice,» accuses the Carnegie
study of «numerous outright errors of fact, as well as errors of omission and interpretation that seriously undermine its credibility.»
On Jan. 24, readers questioned three members of the Teacher Leaders Network — Corrina Knight, a 6th grade language arts / social
studies teacher at Salem Middle
School in Apex, N.C.; Linda Emm, an educational specialist with Schools of Choice in Miami, and a consultant with the National School Reform Faculty; and Carolann Wade, the coordinator for national - board certification and liaison for Peace College's teacher education program of the Wake County, N.C., school district — about their work with teacher - directed professional develo
School in Apex, N.C.; Linda Emm, an educational specialist with
Schools of
Choice in Miami, and a consultant with the National
School Reform Faculty; and Carolann Wade, the coordinator for national - board certification and liaison for Peace College's teacher education program of the Wake County, N.C., school district — about their work with teacher - directed professional develo
School Reform Faculty; and Carolann Wade, the coordinator for national - board certification and liaison for Peace College's teacher education program of the Wake County, N.C.,
school district — about their work with teacher - directed professional develo
school district — about their work with teacher - directed professional development.
But there is risk of overstating results from any single
study, especially
on issues as controversial and polarizing as private
school choice.
These prior
studies are based largely
on non-experimental comparisons of survey responses of similar students in public and private
schools, whereas our
study is the first to examine data
on the actual voting behavior of students who participated in a
choice lottery.
TIP provides a new way to look at what is going
on behind the
school gate, as Susan Craig states: «Traditional explanations of children's disruptive behaviours often emphasise their volitional aspects, suggesting that they occur as a result of bad
choices, or intentional defiance... Recent
studies of trauma and self and self - regulation provide an explanation.»
The No Child Left Behind Act famously endorses the use of «scientifically based research,» the federal Institute of Education Sciences has elevated the profile of rigorous scholarship, and presidential candidates tout
studies on teacher quality, testing, and
school choice.
Seven of the eight previous
studies using similar definitions of segregation found that,
on average, students move from more segregated to less segregated
schools as a result of
school choice.
Much has been written and
studied regarding
choice in education —
on charter
schools, vouchers,
choice among district
schools, and much more — but the idea, so powerful in our economy and in other enterprises, including higher education, has rarely been examined in the context of federalism and the appropriate roles of Washington and lower levels of government.
On average during our
study period, about 21 percent of
schools in the 39 states with this information had NCLB - induced
choice, with considerable variation across areas and over time.
He is also the author or editor of numerous other publications including the following:
School Choice International: Exploring public private partnerships (co-editor with Rajashri Chakrabarti)
School Money Trials: The Legal Pursuit of Educational Adequacy (co-editor with Martin R. West) Reforming Education in Florida: A
Study Prepared by the Koret Task Force
on K - 12 Education (editor) The Education Gap: Vouchers and Urban
Schools (with William G. Howell) Generational Change: Closing the Test Score Gap (editor) No Child Left Behind?
Understanding the effect of private
school choice on real - world success beyond test scores requires data
on outcomes like college enrollment and graduation, and thanks to three recent Urban Institute
studies, we know more about this than we did a year ago.
As a result of our findings of no consistent statistical association between the achievement and attainment effects in
school choice studies we urged commentators and policymakers «to be more humble» in judging
school choice programs or
schools of
choice based solely or primarily
on initial test score effects.
The effects of private -
school -
choice programs
on the achievement of student participants have been extensively
studied using a variety of research designs.