To process your case
study review writing, start by reading the case study properly.
Full Published Article in the Ohio Social
Studies Review Written by Daniel Krutka and Michael Milton
Not exact matches
Last year, in a
review published in the journal Nature, Beebe and coauthors
wrote that hematology, the
study of blood, was one of the leading areas of use for microfluidic technology, though «a «killer application'that propels microfluidics into the mainstream has yet to emerge.»
«The average medical debt in Massachusetts in 2013 was relatively low at just $ 3,041 (6 percent of total unsecured debt) compared to $ 8,594 (20 percent of total unsecured debt) nationwide,» Austin
writes in his 2014
study, portions of which were published in the Maine Law
Review.
While all this sounds reassuring, the State Department also
writes elsewhere in the report that «a focused, peer -
reviewed study of the potential corrosivity / erosivity of oil - sands derived crude oils relative to other crude oils has not yet been conducted.»
«According to the
studies [the Government Accountability Office]
reviewed, climate change may substantially increase losses by 2040 and increase losses from about 50 to 100 percent by 2100,» GAO
wrote in a 2014
study.
After
reviewing the newly - discovered / recovered
studies, Kleck — in his best professorial manner —
wrote:
Reviewing the
study in the Times Literary Supplement, Joachim Whaley
writes that «the difference between Protestant and Catholic marriage reformers was much less than is commonly thought.
It was
written for China
Review International, the Journal of the Center for Chinese
Studies, University of Hawaii, February 10, 2014 by Franklin J. Woo.
John W. DeGruchy was Robert Selby Taylor Professor of Christian
Studies at the University of Cape Town in South Africa when this
review was
written (1997).
In 2005 I
wrote a
review for First Things of St. Louis University professor Donald T. Critchlow's fine
study of Schlafly's political career, Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism.
St Olave's said: «Following a
review of the school's policy on entry to Year 13, the headmaster and governors of St Olave's Grammar School have taken the decision to remove this requirement and we have today
written to all parents of pupils affected to explain this and offer them the opportunity to return to the school and continue their
studies.
[Editor's note: This response to David Pailin's
review of Ford book, Transforming Process Theism, was commissioned by the editor of Process
Studies after David Pailin had
written his
review of Ford's book.
As a Jesuit seminarian in the 1950s (he left the Society of Jesus well before ordination), he rebelled against the liberal editorials of the Jesuit opinion weekly America and soon began
writing for William Buckley's flagship conservative periodical National
Review and penned a fine
study of G.K. Chesterton.
Also, please contact me if you are a small group leader interested in using Evolving in Monkey Town as part of a book
study... or if you
write for an online / print publication and would like a copy for
review....
Regarding the short - term animal feeding
study, Konrad
wrote: «Our rat - feeding
study was comprehensive and statistically valid; a panel of experts
reviewed the
study and unanimously agreed that soy leghemoglobin is safe.»
The authors» responsibilities were as follows — CNM: had leadership responsibility for the research planning and execution,
wrote the manuscript, and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; CNM, HE, and BN: formulated the
study idea and designed the research; EV and JM: managed the day - to - day conduct of the
study and oversaw the data collection; YJ: performed statistical analyses of the
study data; and all authors: provided critical
review and commentary on the draft of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
Researchers
writing in the Archives of Women's Mental Health,
reviewed 10 medical
studies including four with humans and six on animals.
Fransen (2015) makes a few intriguing points: The Midwives Alliance of North American (MANA) identifies a systematic
review written within the official «journal» of Lamaze International as one «best available
studies on planned home birth and maternal fetal outcomes.»
In an effort to comfort babies and support parents this MTF
Writing Group
review will highlight the findings of a recent
study that put some of these age - old remedies to the test.
Maybe somebody should do a
study on it,
write it up, and subject it to peer
review.
10 months pass — NFL / USA Football does not change the marketing marketing of the discrepancies from the peer -
reviewed study, even when this
study is to be used the keystone of the NFL / USA Football's
written testimony, oral presentation and the accompanying slide deck.
Since 2006, she has co-ordinated the
review process, written to authors for additional information, managed data for the review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspe
review process,
written to authors for additional information, managed data for the
review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspe
review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into
Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspe
Review Manager, re-entered data for the included
studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspective.
Seven additional references with relevant data were also included: 3
studies were identified by an ongoing OVID alert system for a related
review (9, 14, 15), 2 were cited from reference lists of eligible
studies (16, 17), 1 article was
written by 2 of the authors (RMM and GDS)(18), and 1 meeting abstract was also identified (19).
His scholarly
write - ups have been published in international journals such as Human Rights Quarterly (US), Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics (UK), African Affairs (UK), and
Review of Human Factor
Studies (Canada).
But in his letter Cable
wrote: «As you will recall, there were
reviews,
studies and reports into whether the assumption that immigration suppressed UK wages was supported by the evidence.
Two years ago, I
wrote a
review of an eye - opening book by two distinguished criminal justice professors who have
studied the NYPD's COMPSTAT, Bratton's signature program.
With this kind of
review process, if 20
studies of the effectiveness of a truly ineffective drug are conducted, and one of them shows a significant effect with a p - value of 0.05 because of chance alone, investigators for the other 19
studies not showing any effect would presumably not be inhibited from
writing up and submitting reports of these for publication out of fear that they'll be denied publication because of their nonsignificant results.
A. De La Baume Pluvinel and F. Baldet
wrote in The Astrophysical
Review that «the exceptionally fine weather during the autumn of 1908 and the considerable northern declination of this comet have enabled us to
study its spectrum under very favorable circumstances.»
Beginning in February, 40
study sections will meet earlier than usual to
review submissions from first - time applicants and provide
written evaluations within a week.
The new
study underscores just «how difficult social norms are to measure,» says Hammond, who
wrote a
review paper on social influence and obesity that was published last year.
The authors state that: «The
study was approved by the Institutional
Review Boards of our institutions... and informed
written consent was obtained from the patient.»
«Our
review highlights that
studies to date varied widely in hypotheses and research methods, suggesting that the field needs to develop more standardized methods to allow for a clearer understanding of the role of comorbid depression among adolescents in substance abuse treatment,»
wrote the researchers in a joint statement.
Once the
study team has
reviewed the completed report (which obviously has to be
written!)
Since Lockley left Britain for the «Wild West» of America, where dinosaurs once roamed in abundance, he has fostered the
study of dinosaur footprints,
writing several technical books such as Dinosaur Tracks (Columbia University Press, 1995;
reviewed in New Scientist, 7 October 1995, p 65).
«Evidence from clinical
studies... often fails to predict the clinical utility of drugs,» health researchers Huseyin Naci and John Ioannidis
write in the current issue of Annual
Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology.
I was quite sure that something different was warranted after 3 years of fairly intensive
study — mostly benchwork and
writing papers, plus a couple of
review articles — but wasn't quite sure just what.
Conversely, the
review of student
writing showed the young authors adhering more to «conventional
writing practices» and a trend toward less play with genre, more mundane narratives and simpler language over the two decades
studied.
The authors point to
studies of harmful and beneficial effects of thrombolytic and antiarrhythmic drugs for myocardial infarction, for example: «Not only would systematic
reviews... have reduced waste resulting from unjustified research, they would also have shown how to reduce morbidity and sometimes mortality, both in patients allocated to relatively less effective or actually harmful treatments in unnecessary trials, and in patients generally,» the authors
write.
This is the first time the results have been
written up in a peer -
reviewed journal, however, providing a «coherent, comprehensive, carefully vetted presentation of the data,» says neurologist Stephen Salloway of Brown University, one of the
study investigators.
► «A damning report on how the University of Minnesota (UM) protects volunteers in its clinical trials concludes that researchers inadequately
reviewed research
studies across the university and need more training to better protect the most vulnerable subjects,» Jennifer Couzin - Frankel
wrote Monday at ScienceInsider.
As a graduate student, Bankston participated in a grant -
writing course that included a chance to
review grant proposals in a simulated
study section.
Usually only two
study section members
write formal
reviews of your proposal, and generally you won't know who they are.
«Science would be better off if journals allowed for and participated in the empirical
study and quality assurance of their peer
review processes,» they
write.
«Due to the scientific value and ethical dispute of this
study, we not only conducted scientific peer -
review, but also consulted related publishing and ethical experts,»
wrote Rao, a structural biologist at Nankai University in Tianjin, in an e-mail to Science.
The committee that conducted the
study and
wrote the report said that science knowledge is only one component of science literacy, which also encompasses understanding scientific practices, such as forming and testing hypotheses, and understanding science as a social process, such as the role of peer
review.
The expert committee that
wrote the new report
reviewed recent
studies that in contrast examined how sodium consumption affects direct health outcomes like heart disease and death.
Institutional
Review Board approval and
written consent were obtained for the
study, which was funded by an investigator - initiated grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ENDP).
But even one - off computer code scripts
written for a single
study should undergo examination and peer
review, Morin said.
► The World Health Organization (WHO) wants «the main findings of every clinical
study» to be «submitted to a peer -
reviewed journal within 12 months after data collection ends and be published — in an open - access journal unless there is a specific reason why that's impossible — within 24 months,» Martin Enserink
wrote in a Tuesday ScienceInsider.