Sentences with phrase «study review writing»

To process your case study review writing, start by reading the case study properly.
Full Published Article in the Ohio Social Studies Review Written by Daniel Krutka and Michael Milton

Not exact matches

Last year, in a review published in the journal Nature, Beebe and coauthors wrote that hematology, the study of blood, was one of the leading areas of use for microfluidic technology, though «a «killer application'that propels microfluidics into the mainstream has yet to emerge.»
«The average medical debt in Massachusetts in 2013 was relatively low at just $ 3,041 (6 percent of total unsecured debt) compared to $ 8,594 (20 percent of total unsecured debt) nationwide,» Austin writes in his 2014 study, portions of which were published in the Maine Law Review.
While all this sounds reassuring, the State Department also writes elsewhere in the report that «a focused, peer - reviewed study of the potential corrosivity / erosivity of oil - sands derived crude oils relative to other crude oils has not yet been conducted.»
«According to the studies [the Government Accountability Office] reviewed, climate change may substantially increase losses by 2040 and increase losses from about 50 to 100 percent by 2100,» GAO wrote in a 2014 study.
After reviewing the newly - discovered / recovered studies, Kleck — in his best professorial manner — wrote:
Reviewing the study in the Times Literary Supplement, Joachim Whaley writes that «the difference between Protestant and Catholic marriage reformers was much less than is commonly thought.
It was written for China Review International, the Journal of the Center for Chinese Studies, University of Hawaii, February 10, 2014 by Franklin J. Woo.
John W. DeGruchy was Robert Selby Taylor Professor of Christian Studies at the University of Cape Town in South Africa when this review was written (1997).
In 2005 I wrote a review for First Things of St. Louis University professor Donald T. Critchlow's fine study of Schlafly's political career, Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism.
St Olave's said: «Following a review of the school's policy on entry to Year 13, the headmaster and governors of St Olave's Grammar School have taken the decision to remove this requirement and we have today written to all parents of pupils affected to explain this and offer them the opportunity to return to the school and continue their studies.
[Editor's note: This response to David Pailin's review of Ford book, Transforming Process Theism, was commissioned by the editor of Process Studies after David Pailin had written his review of Ford's book.
As a Jesuit seminarian in the 1950s (he left the Society of Jesus well before ordination), he rebelled against the liberal editorials of the Jesuit opinion weekly America and soon began writing for William Buckley's flagship conservative periodical National Review and penned a fine study of G.K. Chesterton.
Also, please contact me if you are a small group leader interested in using Evolving in Monkey Town as part of a book study... or if you write for an online / print publication and would like a copy for review....
Regarding the short - term animal feeding study, Konrad wrote: «Our rat - feeding study was comprehensive and statistically valid; a panel of experts reviewed the study and unanimously agreed that soy leghemoglobin is safe.»
The authors» responsibilities were as follows — CNM: had leadership responsibility for the research planning and execution, wrote the manuscript, and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; CNM, HE, and BN: formulated the study idea and designed the research; EV and JM: managed the day - to - day conduct of the study and oversaw the data collection; YJ: performed statistical analyses of the study data; and all authors: provided critical review and commentary on the draft of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
Researchers writing in the Archives of Women's Mental Health, reviewed 10 medical studies including four with humans and six on animals.
Fransen (2015) makes a few intriguing points: The Midwives Alliance of North American (MANA) identifies a systematic review written within the official «journal» of Lamaze International as one «best available studies on planned home birth and maternal fetal outcomes.»
In an effort to comfort babies and support parents this MTF Writing Group review will highlight the findings of a recent study that put some of these age - old remedies to the test.
Maybe somebody should do a study on it, write it up, and subject it to peer review.
10 months pass — NFL / USA Football does not change the marketing marketing of the discrepancies from the peer - reviewed study, even when this study is to be used the keystone of the NFL / USA Football's written testimony, oral presentation and the accompanying slide deck.
Since 2006, she has co-ordinated the review process, written to authors for additional information, managed data for the review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspereview process, written to authors for additional information, managed data for the review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspereview, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspeReview Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspective.
Seven additional references with relevant data were also included: 3 studies were identified by an ongoing OVID alert system for a related review (9, 14, 15), 2 were cited from reference lists of eligible studies (16, 17), 1 article was written by 2 of the authors (RMM and GDS)(18), and 1 meeting abstract was also identified (19).
His scholarly write - ups have been published in international journals such as Human Rights Quarterly (US), Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics (UK), African Affairs (UK), and Review of Human Factor Studies (Canada).
But in his letter Cable wrote: «As you will recall, there were reviews, studies and reports into whether the assumption that immigration suppressed UK wages was supported by the evidence.
Two years ago, I wrote a review of an eye - opening book by two distinguished criminal justice professors who have studied the NYPD's COMPSTAT, Bratton's signature program.
With this kind of review process, if 20 studies of the effectiveness of a truly ineffective drug are conducted, and one of them shows a significant effect with a p - value of 0.05 because of chance alone, investigators for the other 19 studies not showing any effect would presumably not be inhibited from writing up and submitting reports of these for publication out of fear that they'll be denied publication because of their nonsignificant results.
A. De La Baume Pluvinel and F. Baldet wrote in The Astrophysical Review that «the exceptionally fine weather during the autumn of 1908 and the considerable northern declination of this comet have enabled us to study its spectrum under very favorable circumstances.»
Beginning in February, 40 study sections will meet earlier than usual to review submissions from first - time applicants and provide written evaluations within a week.
The new study underscores just «how difficult social norms are to measure,» says Hammond, who wrote a review paper on social influence and obesity that was published last year.
The authors state that: «The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of our institutions... and informed written consent was obtained from the patient.»
«Our review highlights that studies to date varied widely in hypotheses and research methods, suggesting that the field needs to develop more standardized methods to allow for a clearer understanding of the role of comorbid depression among adolescents in substance abuse treatment,» wrote the researchers in a joint statement.
Once the study team has reviewed the completed report (which obviously has to be written!)
Since Lockley left Britain for the «Wild West» of America, where dinosaurs once roamed in abundance, he has fostered the study of dinosaur footprints, writing several technical books such as Dinosaur Tracks (Columbia University Press, 1995; reviewed in New Scientist, 7 October 1995, p 65).
«Evidence from clinical studies... often fails to predict the clinical utility of drugs,» health researchers Huseyin Naci and John Ioannidis write in the current issue of Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology.
I was quite sure that something different was warranted after 3 years of fairly intensive study — mostly benchwork and writing papers, plus a couple of review articles — but wasn't quite sure just what.
Conversely, the review of student writing showed the young authors adhering more to «conventional writing practices» and a trend toward less play with genre, more mundane narratives and simpler language over the two decades studied.
The authors point to studies of harmful and beneficial effects of thrombolytic and antiarrhythmic drugs for myocardial infarction, for example: «Not only would systematic reviews... have reduced waste resulting from unjustified research, they would also have shown how to reduce morbidity and sometimes mortality, both in patients allocated to relatively less effective or actually harmful treatments in unnecessary trials, and in patients generally,» the authors write.
This is the first time the results have been written up in a peer - reviewed journal, however, providing a «coherent, comprehensive, carefully vetted presentation of the data,» says neurologist Stephen Salloway of Brown University, one of the study investigators.
► «A damning report on how the University of Minnesota (UM) protects volunteers in its clinical trials concludes that researchers inadequately reviewed research studies across the university and need more training to better protect the most vulnerable subjects,» Jennifer Couzin - Frankel wrote Monday at ScienceInsider.
As a graduate student, Bankston participated in a grant - writing course that included a chance to review grant proposals in a simulated study section.
Usually only two study section members write formal reviews of your proposal, and generally you won't know who they are.
«Science would be better off if journals allowed for and participated in the empirical study and quality assurance of their peer review processes,» they write.
«Due to the scientific value and ethical dispute of this study, we not only conducted scientific peer - review, but also consulted related publishing and ethical experts,» wrote Rao, a structural biologist at Nankai University in Tianjin, in an e-mail to Science.
The committee that conducted the study and wrote the report said that science knowledge is only one component of science literacy, which also encompasses understanding scientific practices, such as forming and testing hypotheses, and understanding science as a social process, such as the role of peer review.
The expert committee that wrote the new report reviewed recent studies that in contrast examined how sodium consumption affects direct health outcomes like heart disease and death.
Institutional Review Board approval and written consent were obtained for the study, which was funded by an investigator - initiated grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ENDP).
But even one - off computer code scripts written for a single study should undergo examination and peer review, Morin said.
► The World Health Organization (WHO) wants «the main findings of every clinical study» to be «submitted to a peer - reviewed journal within 12 months after data collection ends and be published — in an open - access journal unless there is a specific reason why that's impossible — within 24 months,» Martin Enserink wrote in a Tuesday ScienceInsider.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z