UF / IFAS assistant professor of food and resource economics Jaclyn Kropp — along with economists at Georgia State University, Clemson University and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — worked with a county school food services director to develop a novel research model to
study school lunch choices children make, combining lunch sales data collected at the cafeteria register with data on student absences.
Not exact matches
The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a group that promotes a plant - based diet, cited the Boston
study in filing a petition in July asking that the USDA eliminate dairy requirements from the
school lunch program.
Today, scientific
studies have proven that the
school meals served in many
schools are much more nutritious than packed
lunches.
As for plate waste and changes in participation, please check out this piece I wrote on The
Lunch Tray, cross-posted in Civil Eats, which summarizes an in - depth Pew research
study on how
schools are adapting.
She is also featured in Free for All: Fixing
School Food in America by Janet Poppendieck (California
Studies in Food & Culture, 2010) and
Lunch Lessons: Changing the Way We Feed Our Children, by Ann Cooper and Lisa Holmes (HarperCollins, 2006), has been a guest on PBS's To The Contrary, and appears in the documentary film Two Angry Moms.
But at least one
study has shown that kids who regularly eat
school lunch are actually doing better nutritionally than ones who don't.
None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to implement an interim final or final rule regarding nutrition programs under the Richard B. Russell National
School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) and the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) that --(1) requires crediting of tomato paste and puree based on volume; (2) implements a sodium reduction target beyond Target I, the 2 - year target, specified in Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, «Nutrition Standards in the National
School Lunch and
School Breakfast Programs» (FNS — 2007 — 0038, RIN 0584 — AD59) until the Secretary certifies that the Department has reviewed and evaluated relevant scientific
studies and data relevant to the relationship of sodium reductions to human health; and (3) establishes any whole grain requirement without defining «whole grain.»
The New York Times «Vital Signs» column reports today on a
study of more than a thousand Michigan sixth graders which found that those students who regularly ate
school lunch were 29 % more likely to be obese than those who brought
lunch from... [Continue reading]
Research
studies have shown time and again that
school children who eat balanced
lunches learn better than children who do not eat
lunch or do not eat a balanced
lunch.
a See U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study II, April 2008, p. 3 - 5.
[26] See U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study I, October 1994, p. 6 - 10.
For the months during the
study, the
school district provided data for average daily participation rates, overall
school enrollment, and percent of students receiving a free or reduced price
lunch.
Several
studies have found that decreased access to competitive foods leads to increased participation in the National
School Lunch Program and subsequent increases in federal reimbursements and overall revenue.
b See U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study II, April 2008, p. 4 - 2.
It costs an average of about $ 2.92 to prepare and serve a
lunch that meets federal nutrition requirements, according to a national
study by the
School Nutrition Association.
According to a recent USDA
study, the price that
school districts charged for paid
lunches during the 2004 - 2005
school year varied considerably, ranging from 65 cents to $ 3.00.
[28] See U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study II, April 2008, p. 9 - 9.
See U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study II, April 2008, p. 1 - 5, 3 - 5, 4 - 2, and Exhibits 7.9 and 7.14.
Finally, Table 3 provides enrollment and
lunch sales information for the
schools in the
study.
NEW YORK (Reuters Health)- Strict
school lunch standards that are similar to new regulations from the U.S. government may be tied to healthier body weights among students, according to a new
study.
[3] See U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study I, October 1994; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study II, April 2008.
[4] See U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
School Lunch and Breakfast Cost
Study II, April 2008, Exhibit ES.12.
Neuberger points to a
study indicating that, for every additional 1 percent of
school lunch applications audited nationwide, 30,000 eligible children will lose benefits.
Previous
studies questioned whether the USDA's National
School Lunch Program, which provides free or reduced - priced meals to low - income students, helped children maintain a healthy weight.
A USDA
study in 2009 found disparities among states in signing up children who receive food stamps for the
school lunch program.
As this FRAC report indicates, http://tinyurl.com/lhg52av
studies have shown that NSLP participation drops 1 % for every 5 cent increase in the paid price of a
school lunch.
Cooper said that a Berkeley
school district
study released this month showed that «kids who go through our whole program eat three times more vegetables than kids who bring their
lunch from home.»
I wonder if the
studies looking at the nutrient intake of kids eating
school lunches are factoring in what the children actually ate — or simply what they took (or had to take) on their tray?
A new
study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (subscription only) finds that home - packed
lunches are nutritionally lacking, as compared to
school food.
As summarized by Reuters, the
study's researchers peered into the
lunch boxes of 626 third and fourth graders from 12 public elementary
schools in Eastern Massachusetts, and found that only 34 % of
lunches contained fruit, only 11 % contained vegetables, 42 % contained snacks and 28 % included dessert.
I also didn't see or hear any mention of
school lunches being better than
lunches from home in either the
study or in the Today Show piece.
Now, no one wants to pooh - pooh the prospect of little kids falling ill from food poisoning, but I know I'm not the only parent (and daily packer of
school lunches) who heard about this
study and, well, scoffed.
This topic merits more extensive
study, that more closely examines the number of foodborne illness cases in preschool aged children who bring
lunch from home compared with others who eat
school - prepared
lunch.
A
study released Tuesday by the Illinois Hunger Coalition found that only 16 percent of the students who get free
lunch through the National School Lunch Program during the regular school year take advantage of the same program in the su
lunch through the National
School Lunch Program during the regular school year take advantage of the same program in the s
School Lunch Program during the regular school year take advantage of the same program in the su
Lunch Program during the regular
school year take advantage of the same program in the s
school year take advantage of the same program in the summer.
From the file of Rather Obvious News, this
study from the University of Michigan Medical
School: children who consume foods purchased from school vending machines, school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
School: children who consume foods purchased from
school vending machines, school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
school vending machines,
school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
school stores, snack bars and other sales that compete with the federal
school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.&
school lunch program are «more likely to develop poor diet quality — and that may be associated with being overweight, obese or at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes and coronary artery disease.»
I have to admit that before living in the US and before having a kid, packed
school lunches were science fiction for me and I would have thought this
study was right.
just the type of parents you can dupe into second guessing themselves and buying
school lunch for their kids merely by publishing a flawed
study???
And as for the paranoia that someone rigged this
study to get parents to buy
school lunch for their kids, this is a daycare.
Studies have shown that
lunches packed from home are typically not healthier than
lunches served at
school, so that excuse is out the window too.
Yes, we should be reminded to maybe put an extra ice pack in the insulated
lunch bag (it doesn't hurt) but I'm interpreting (I may be wrong) these
studies like
school lunches are «safer» and healthier.
In keeping with the rather serious tone infecting The
Lunch Tray this week (except for the comic relief provided by the school lunch lady action figure - thank goodness for her), the Wall Street Journal recently reported on two new studies showing... [Continue rea
Lunch Tray this week (except for the comic relief provided by the
school lunch lady action figure - thank goodness for her), the Wall Street Journal recently reported on two new studies showing... [Continue rea
lunch lady action figure - thank goodness for her), the Wall Street Journal recently reported on two new
studies showing... [Continue reading]
The
study authors concluded that «adding puréed vegetables to
lunch entrées may be an effective strategy to increase vegetable consumption and reduce energy intake of elementary
school children.
In one
study,
school - aged kids who drank milk at
lunch were the only ones who met the recommended daily allowance of calcium.
The vast majority of sack
lunches that kids bring to
school aren't properly cooled or refrigerated and could pose a health hazard to young children, a new
study in the journal Pediatrics suggests.
In Montana, state
school officials were looking for ways to improve children's eating habits and physical activity, and conducted a four -
school pilot
study of «recess before
lunch» in 2002.
Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food
studies and public health at New York University and author of «What To Eat,» was pleasantly surprised this week to hear that Mrs. Q had stuck with her
school lunch blog.
It's no wonder, then, that another
study from 2009 that looked at children who participated in the National
School Lunch Program found they were more likely to gain weight than other children.
Other
studies have found that kids in the national
school lunch program drink more milk and eat fewer snack foods, sweets and sweetened beverages than others.
I
study Japanese
school lunch and was very happy to learn that this is a component in the book.
In keeping with the rather serious tone infecting The
Lunch Tray this week (except for the comic relief provided by the school lunch lady action figure — thank goodness for her), the Wall Street Journal recently reported on two new studies showing that good heart health starts in childhood — and that poor habits can potentially cause cardiac problems later in
Lunch Tray this week (except for the comic relief provided by the
school lunch lady action figure — thank goodness for her), the Wall Street Journal recently reported on two new studies showing that good heart health starts in childhood — and that poor habits can potentially cause cardiac problems later in
lunch lady action figure — thank goodness for her), the Wall Street Journal recently reported on two new
studies showing that good heart health starts in childhood — and that poor habits can potentially cause cardiac problems later in life.