The project grew out of a practical problem we encountered when
studying big city school systems: in many cities, the public school «system» is actually a collection of systems: school districts (often more than one), charter schools, and even state agencies.
Not exact matches
In Brazil's
biggest city, São Paulo, this relationship is no different, as attested by a
study conducted by researchers at University of São Paulo's Public Health
School (FSP - USP).
As it was conceived, the
School of the Future was to be a study in contrast to the typical big - city high s
School of the Future was to be a
study in contrast to the typical
big -
city high
schoolschool.
This approach, which is used by Caroline Hoxby and Jonah Rockoff in their
study of charter
schools in Chicago (see «Findings from the
City of
Big Shoulders»), is useful for determining if a particular charter
school or the education program it offered is effective.
The prose in this volume will appeal more to the citation - enthralled political scientist than to the informed citizen, but the
study itself brings together the best available evidence on the consequences of mayoral efforts to reform
big -
city school systems.
In
School Breakfast in America's
Big Cities, a January 2011 report released by the Food Research and Action Center, 16 of the 29 urban districts examined in the
study «performed above the national average in reaching low - income students with breakfast.
A
study by the Fordham Institute in 2004 found that in
big cities many teachers send their own kids to private
schools.
And a 2004
study by the Fordham Institute showed that the percentage of
big city teachers who put their own kids in private
school was even greater.
Additionally, a revealing new
study conducted by Patrick Wolf, Corey De Angeles, et al shows that in eight
big American
cities, each dollar invested in a child's k - 12
schooling results in $ 6.44 in lifetime earnings in public charter
schools compared to just $ 4.67 in lifetime earnings in TPS.
Some
studies in both Massachusetts and New York
City have found that a «No Excuses» educational approach — characterized by mandated intensive tutoring, longer instruction times, frequent teacher feedback, strict disciplinary policies, and high expectations for students — is a common feature among charter
schools with the
biggest positive effects (however, the most effective of these
schools are located in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods, making it difficult to disentangle whether this is due to the No Excuses approach or sub-par public
school alternatives).