Western Michigan researchers have been
studying carbon capture technology since 2004.
Not exact matches
But even if the
carbon released during production were somehow
captured and sequestered — a
technology that remains unproven at any meaningful scale — some
studies indicate that liquid coal would still release 4 to 8 percent more global warming pollution than regular gasoline.
The
study's authors point to a future with greater reliance on nuclear and renewable energy, reducing emissions through new
technologies that
capture and store
carbon dioxide, and expanding forests to naturally absorb and store
carbon.
As our ongoing Energy Challenge series and plenty of independent
studies have made clear, the country and world are still not engaged seriously in advancing non-polluting energy
technologies, from solar cells to the elusive notion of
capturing carbon dioxide from power plants at a large scale and stashing it somewhere.
To reconcile China's need for more cheap energy with its climate goals, the plan calls for a major pilot project to
study carbon capture and sequestration, a
technology intended to
capture carbon dioxide from coal plants and either bury it underground or repackage it for use as an industrial chemical.
This
study examines the effect of patents on the worldwide transfer of clean energy
technologies (CETs), including solar photovoltaic, geothermal, wind, and
carbon capture.
In October 2010 it was announced that Tenaska will receive $ 7.7 million in grant money to be used for an engineering design
study of
carbon capture technology in its proposed Trailblazer Energy Center.
Four years of
study and talking to industry insiders and environmental organisations, some of which have backed CCS, show the arguments for
carbon capture differ from country to country, but in none of them is the
technology taking off, he reports.
A 2009
study on the negative effects of power generation by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (ATSE), «The hidden costs of electricity: externalities of power generation in Australia» calculated the greenhouse impacts and health damage costs of different power generation
technologies including coal, gas, wind, solar photovoltaic, solar thermal, geothermal,
carbon capture and storage, and nuclear energy, and determined that health costs of burning coal are equivalent to a national health burden of around $ A2.6 billion per annum.
In the face of mounting support for clean coal and the billions being invested in
carbon capture and storage, or C.C.S.,
technology, a new assessment from the University of Toronto's Munk Center for International
Studies has a stern warning for policy - makers: there could be dramatic unintended environmental consequences to sequestering huge amounts of
carbon dioxide in the earth's mantle.
Adding to the gloom, an allied
technology called
carbon capture and utilization (CCU)- which makes use of
captured CO2, rather than storing it underground - was reported yesterday to be many years from fruition, in a
study from the UK's Center for Low
Carbon Futures.
A new
study by Michael Wang and Jeongwoo Han at Argonne National Laboratory and Xiaomin Xie at Shanghai Jiao Tong University assesses the effects of
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technology and cellulosic biomass and... Read more →