Not exact matches
Homebirth and
midwifery advocates point with pride to a recent
study that showed that homebirth with a midwife in the Netherlands is as safe as hospital
birth with a midwife (Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 low - risk planned
home and hospital
births).
The
study was a prospective cohort
study with planned place of
birth at the start of care in labour as the exposure (
home, freestanding
midwifery unit, alongside
midwifery unit, or obstetric unit).12 Women were included in the group in which they planned to give
birth at the start of care in labour regardless of whether they were transferred during labour or immediately after
birth.
Outcomes of intended
home births in nurse -
midwifery practice: a prospective descriptive
study.
11 12 This contrasts with the Netherlands, for instance, where
home midwifery caseloads of more than 100
births a year are common.16 It is not known, however, if practitioners in our
study also practised in other settings.
of Vermont («Sisters on a Journey: Portraits of North American Midwives»); Jess Fallon, Women's
Studies, Wesleyan; Pamela Klassen, Religion, Drew University (spirituality in
home birth); Maureen May, Syracuse University (
midwifery politics and legislation in New York state); Christina Player (
midwifery politics in Massachusetts); Melissa Denmark, University of Florida (the development of direct - entry
midwifery legislation in Florida); Fern McGill, Antioch University (an investigation of feminist positions on childbirth), Kate Masley (the political economy of reproduction in Honduras and in Cleveland, Ohio), and others not listed here; and as an informal advisor to dozens more.
In this
study of the cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of
birth in England in women at low risk of complications before the onset of labour, we found that the cost of intrapartum and after
birth care, and associated related complications, was less for
births planned at
home, in a free standing
midwifery unit, or in an alongside
midwifery unit compared with planned
births in an obstetric unit.
Setting 142 of 147 trusts providing
home birth services, 53 of 56 freestanding
midwifery units, 43 of 51 alongside
midwifery units, and a random sample of 36 of 180 obstetric units, stratified by unit size and geographical region, in England, over varying periods of time within the
study period 1 April 2008 to 30 April 2010.
The cohort
study aimed to collect data in every NHS trust in England that provides
home birth services, every free standing
midwifery unit, every alongside
midwifery unit, and a random sample of obstetric units, stratified by unit size and geographical region, over varying periods of time within the
study period (1 April 2008 to 31 April 2010).
A secondary analysis of data from the prospective observational Birthplace in England
study found that immersion was associated with significant reductions in antepartum transfers to hospitals for planned
home births, freestanding
midwifery unit
births, and alongside
midwifery unit
births (2).
[8] Murphy PA, Fullerton J. Outcomes of intended
home births in nurse -
midwifery practices: a prospective descriptive
study.
In a
study reported in the January / February 1999 issue of the Journal of Nurse -
Midwifery, 2 in every 1,000
home births (with certified nurse midwives) resulted in the death of the baby, either during labor or within a month after
birth, compared with 2.2 deaths per 1,000 hospital
births.
The
study, published in the Journal of
Midwifery & Women's Health on Thursday, looked at the
home birth outcomes for roughly 17,000 women as recorded in the Midwives Alliance of North America data collection system between 2004 and 2009.
Jane Sandall was and is principal investigator for two
studies evaluating models of midwife - led continuity of care (Sandall 2001), and co-investigator on the «Birthplace in England Research Programme», an integrated programme of research designed to compare outcomes of
births for women planned at
home, in different types of
midwifery units, and in hospital units with obstetric services.
In today's peer - reviewed Journal of
Midwifery & Women's Health (JMWH), a landmark
study confirms that among low - risk women, planned
home births result in low rates of interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and babies.
In a
study of 1001
home births in the Toronto area before the regulation of
midwifery, the transport rate during labour and post partum was 16.5 %.8 In other national, population - based
studies of planned
home births, rates of intrapartum transport ranged from 14.5 % in Australia9 to 20.3 % in the Netherlands.3
Our
study has evaluated outcomes during the first 2 years of implementation of
midwifery, including
home birth, in BC.
Declan Devane is a co-author in one of the included trials in this review (Begley 2011) Jane Sandall was and is principal investigator for two
studies evaluating models of midwife - led continuity of care (Sandall 2001), and co-investigator on the «Birthplace in England Research Programme», an integrated programme of research designed to compare outcomes of
births for women planned at
home, in different types of
midwifery units, and in hospital units with obstetric services.
According to this
study by The Journal of
Midwifery and Women's Health, the success rate of VBACs at a planned
home birth was also 87 %.
She started attending
births in 2005 while
studying at Maternidad La Luz
Midwifery School on the U.S. / Mexico border and continued attending
home and
birth center
births during her training in Seattle.