Not exact matches
In any case, there are no
studies done on the relative
safety of UC, so it can not be unequivocally stated that UC is more dangerous than midwife - assisted
home birth.
Despite the publication of statements and commentaries querying the reliability of the findings, [2 - 6] this faulty
study now forms the evidentiary basis for an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion, [7] meaning that its results are being presented to expectant parents as the state - of - the - art in
home birth safety research.
That information was not available when I was evaluating
home birth safety, but this number has been coming up over and over in more recent
studies and I think it is very difficult to rationalize away.
Current research includes: co-leading organisational case
studies in Birthplace in England, a national
study of
birth outcomes in
home, midwife led, and obstetric led units; investigating the relationship between measures of
safety climate and health care quality in A and E and intrapartum care; and conducting nested process evaluations of two trials of obesity in pregnancy behavioural interventions.
However, they sometimes draw different conclusions about the
safety of
home,
birth center or hospital
birth, even when they read the same
studies.
As it has been shown that conducting a randomised controlled trial is not possible, the best evidence about the
safety of
home birth can only come from good quality, routine registrations such as the one we used in our
study.
The
study adds to the body of large cohort
studies of planned
home births that have reported on the relative
safety of
home versus hospital
births.
As far as we know, this is the largest
study into the
safety of
home birth.
This
study also provides further evidence to support the
safety of planned
home birth.
That book is full of misinformation, for example he cites the Johnson & Daviss
study saying «any remaing doubts about the
safety of
home birth were conclusively erased» by said
study — which isn't even remotely true (the
home birth data from that
study actually shows that neonatal mortality is 3 TIMES higher at
home):
And there have been many, many
studies that have shown the
safety of
home birth that it's safe or safer to have a low - risk
birth in your
home as it is in the hospital, and especially in the D.C. area.
Olsen: The third
study used by Leslie and Romano for perinatal mortality comparison is also the last
study in section I: Olsen from 1997, «Meta - analysis of the
safety of
home birth.»
MANA had provided me with the 24 best
studies to prove the
safety of
home birth.
The Royal College of Midwives said the
study was further evidence of the
safety and benefits of
home birth.
Johnson & Daviss: Letter C under section III of the list of
studies that the Midwives Alliance of North America deems the very best in proving
home birth safety is titled, «Outcomes of planned
home birth with certified professional midwives.»
While stressing the
study was the most comprehensive yet into the
safety of
home births, they also acknowledged some caveats.
The authors concluded that the findings of this
study provided the first national evaluation of a significant proportion of women choosing publicly funded
home birth in Australia; however, the sample size did not have sufficient power to draw a conclusion about
safety.
The
study did not compare the relative
safety of
home births against low - risk women who opted for doctor rather than midwife - led care.
I suggest that Warfield consult medical journals to read the many
studies that support the
safety of
home birth before accusing those who choose one of risking the health and
safety of their babies.
Other
studies have confirmed that the
home birth and hospital
safety rates are not statistically different.
A new
study tracking the
safety of
home birth in the United States has taken a major step in that direction, its authors believe, finding that outcomes among women who had planned, midwife - led
home births were «excellent,» and that the women experienced relatively low rates of intervention.
The relative
safety of planned
home births is a topic of continuous debate, but
studies have so far been too small to compare severe maternal complications between planned
home and planned hospital
birth among low risk women.
Therefore, this
study makes a novel and valuable contribution to what was previously known about the
safety of
home birth.
Home birth advocates have cited several studies supporting the safety of home births among low - risk wo
Home birth advocates have cited several
studies supporting the
safety of
home births among low - risk wo
home births among low - risk women.
The results of this
study, and those of its companion article about the development of the MANA Stats registry, confirm the
safety and overwhelmingly positive health benefits for low - risk mothers and babies who choose to
birth at
home with a midwife.
International research on
safety of homebirths [1]: «In 2014, a comprehensive review in the Journal of Medical Ethics of 12 previously published
studies encompassing 500,000 planned
home births in low - risk women found that perinatal mortality rates for
home births were triple that of hospital
births.
New
Studies Published by Oregon State University Professor Confirm
Safety of
Home Birth With Midwives in the U.S.
This
study provides women with the information needed to make decisions regarding the
safety of
home birth.
The continued use of
studies using higher mean or high cut - off 5 min Apgar scores, and a bias of high Apgar score, to advocate the
safety of
home births is inappropriate.
Our
study adds to the body of large cohort
studies of planned
home births that have reported on the relative
safety of
home versus hospital
birth.
Yet, when I analyzed all of the
studies that the Midwives» Alliance of North America (MANA) says comprise the best evidence for the
safety of
home birth, I found that every
study that looked at nonhospital
birth in the United States (and many of the
studies that looked at other countries, as well) reported much higher death rates for babies when compared to similar hospital
births.
Includes
studies comparing the
safety of
home and hospital
births and the
safety of care given by midwives.
This means very fundamental things can happen:
safety when you're walking at night, which many indigenous people do, the ability to cook a healthy meal and to have light to see that, the ability to
study or work at
home, to provide medical care if there's been an accident or if a woman is giving
birth.