Scientists
studying leaf fossils found greatly increased signs of insect damage during the last great global warming event around 56 million years ago.
Not exact matches
And their geologically abrupt disappearance makes them the perfect
fossil to mark the end of the Ordovician, or so think geologists like Jan Zalasiewicz of the University of Leicester who has spent much of his professional life
studying the beautiful shapes
left behind by these long - gone animals.
Getting the details right «required many hours of staring,» Nicholls says, as he and Vinther
studied how to untangle the overlapping pigmentation patterns
left in the various folds of the flattened
fossil.
David Frayer, KU professor emeritus of anthropology, is lead author on a recent
study published in the Journal of Evolution that found striations on teeth of a Homo habilis
fossil 1.8 million years old moved from
left to right, indicating the earliest evidence in the
fossil record for right - handedness.
But genetic
studies of modern animals had suggested that all of these creatures evolved from a single - celled ancestor that lived at least 100 million years before that,
leaving a huge gap between the estimated origin of animals and the appearance of the earliest known animal
fossils.
What's more, according to a new
study, the large number of lumps discovered within a very small area hints that these
fossils may be all that's
left of a mysterious mass die - off of the giant creatures.
Studies of
fossil teeth, for instance, suggest that Diplodocus stripped
leaves from trees (New Scientist, Science, 25 March 1995, p 18).
The new
fossils described in the
studies were found in the Jebel Irhoud sediments in front of where the two excavators on the
left of this image are working.
As a paleoanthropologist, Berger
studies fossils and cultural clues
left behind by ancient humans and their relatives.
Paleoanthropologists like Haile - Selassie
study ancient humans and their ancestors, based on
fossils and cultural artifacts or symbols that they
left behind.
According to this
study, we have «used up» around 15 % of all the
fossil fuels that were ever on our planet
leaving 85 % to go.
There have been several
studies of this strategy, and the ones I've seen show the world blowing well past 2 - or 3 - degree - C temperature increases, unless the major energy companies
leave most of their currently known
fossil fuel reserves in the ground along with any new discoveries.
In fact, a 2015
study in the journal Nature revealed that we need to
leave at least 80 percent of the world's known remaining
fossil fuel reserves in the ground to prevent runaway climate change.
A
study of stomatal frequency in
fossil leaves from Holocene lake deposits in Denmark, showing that 9400 years ago CO2 atmospheric level was 333 ppmv, and 9600 years ago 348 ppmv, falsify the concept of stabilized and low CO2 air concentration until the advent of industrial revolution [13].
Is it because they breed on ice, so do not
leave much of a
fossil record for the scientists to
study?
More than one
study has found that the Atlantic coast of the US could face harder and more frequent battering as global temperatures creep up in response to ever - increasing use of
fossil fuels that
leave ever - growing ratios of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
And during the Pliocene, atmospheric carbon dioxide was in the range of 360 - 400 ppm, according to
studies of
fossil leaves.
Earlier literature is reviewed in Royer et al. (2001); some key
studies were Berner (1991)(chemical and other measures of high Cretaceous CO2) and McElwain and Chaloner (1995)(using characteristics of
fossil leaves).
[Translate]
Leaving most of the world's remaining
fossil fuels in the ground could prevent worst - case warming,
study says...
Leaving most of the world's remaining
fossil fuels in the ground could prevent worst - case warming,
study says.
The
study took estimates for how much and what kinds of oil, gas, and coal supplies are
left among the different
fossil - fuel producing nations and geographic regions.