I can understand people making things up, calling the «made up»
stuff as philosophy and theology.
Not exact matches
Although unconscious feeling is the
stuff of nature for Whitehead, his theory of «appearance» is one of the things which brings home the splendor of his
philosophy — and that even
as this theory emphasizes the fusion of conceptual feeling with physical nature.
As Reilly shows, this is the
philosophy of Callicles, who, in Plato's Georgias, has no hesitation in asserting that «luxury and licentiousness and self - indulgence, if they have the support of force, are virtue and happiness...»
As for the «unnatural covenants of mankind,» the good Sophist in Callicles was categorical: they were all «mere
stuff and nonsense.»
As a contemporary commentator noted as early as 1865, Mill's anti-Hamiltonian view of feeling as a neutral stuff prior to the correlation of Ego and Non-Ego, and his confession that the continuity of feeling, though as real as the sequence, was a «final inexplicability» 4 — both positions impelled British philosophy in the direction of some kind of original unity.5 To this end, Bradley will conflate the «feeling» of Hegel and of Mill in order to transform it from a psychological into a metaphysical category that can accomplish the reconciliation of nature and spiri
As a contemporary commentator noted
as early as 1865, Mill's anti-Hamiltonian view of feeling as a neutral stuff prior to the correlation of Ego and Non-Ego, and his confession that the continuity of feeling, though as real as the sequence, was a «final inexplicability» 4 — both positions impelled British philosophy in the direction of some kind of original unity.5 To this end, Bradley will conflate the «feeling» of Hegel and of Mill in order to transform it from a psychological into a metaphysical category that can accomplish the reconciliation of nature and spiri
as early
as 1865, Mill's anti-Hamiltonian view of feeling as a neutral stuff prior to the correlation of Ego and Non-Ego, and his confession that the continuity of feeling, though as real as the sequence, was a «final inexplicability» 4 — both positions impelled British philosophy in the direction of some kind of original unity.5 To this end, Bradley will conflate the «feeling» of Hegel and of Mill in order to transform it from a psychological into a metaphysical category that can accomplish the reconciliation of nature and spiri
as 1865, Mill's anti-Hamiltonian view of feeling
as a neutral stuff prior to the correlation of Ego and Non-Ego, and his confession that the continuity of feeling, though as real as the sequence, was a «final inexplicability» 4 — both positions impelled British philosophy in the direction of some kind of original unity.5 To this end, Bradley will conflate the «feeling» of Hegel and of Mill in order to transform it from a psychological into a metaphysical category that can accomplish the reconciliation of nature and spiri
as a neutral
stuff prior to the correlation of Ego and Non-Ego, and his confession that the continuity of feeling, though
as real as the sequence, was a «final inexplicability» 4 — both positions impelled British philosophy in the direction of some kind of original unity.5 To this end, Bradley will conflate the «feeling» of Hegel and of Mill in order to transform it from a psychological into a metaphysical category that can accomplish the reconciliation of nature and spiri
as real
as the sequence, was a «final inexplicability» 4 — both positions impelled British philosophy in the direction of some kind of original unity.5 To this end, Bradley will conflate the «feeling» of Hegel and of Mill in order to transform it from a psychological into a metaphysical category that can accomplish the reconciliation of nature and spiri
as the sequence, was a «final inexplicability» 4 — both positions impelled British
philosophy in the direction of some kind of original unity.5 To this end, Bradley will conflate the «feeling» of Hegel and of Mill in order to transform it from a psychological into a metaphysical category that can accomplish the reconciliation of nature and spirit.
Perhaps one way to explain libertarian
philosophy is that «everyone is free to be an asshole
as long
as they don't physically hurt someone or steal their
stuff»
Their entire brand is built on an anti-bodybuilding sentiment, a
philosophy of anti-competitiveness and «no gymtimidation» and the chain is aggressively marketed
as a friendlier alternative to traditional gyms, the antithesis of both the old - school hardcore gym and the boutique fitness model: a judgement - free zone away from those sweaty, steroid - addicted meatheads obsessed with lifting heavy
stuff off the floor or gorgeous women with perfect bodies who'll fat shame you to death.
I love the seasonal shower gel sets
Philosophy (14) comes out with each year; they're great to give
as a package or to break up
as stocking
stuffers.
This one has some intuitively added
stuff that tells about the
philosophy behind the design and in the Compact Sedan segment, Aspire is going to stay out
as it has the best looking boot integration in my opinion.
The Sunday
Philosophy Club is very clever, but without ever being obvious or overstated and is
stuffed full of wonderful one - liners such
as «cooking in a temper requires caution with the pepper».
This «rewriting history»
stuff is partly a consequence of the
philosophy of the adjustments, which are designed to estimate what the historical observations would have been had they been taken with the same instruments and at the same locations with the same microclimate
as the current observations.
Concepts such
as accuracy versus precision are the
stuff of the
philosophy of science; i.e. how do you determine whether you are looking at science or pseudo-science?
The
philosophy of positive parenting is that the more you are the «good
stuff»
as a parent, the more you'll get it, too.